Shell Companies
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
GRAF vs KKR vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Banks - Diversified
GRAF vs KKR vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Asset Management | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $312M | $85.80B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $19.04B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $2.37B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | — | 22.5% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 12.3% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 38.8x | 16.0x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $54.77B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $699.00 | $6M | $343.34B |
GRAF vs KKR vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Graf Global Corp. (GRAF) | 100 | 78.1 | -21.9% |
| KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) | 100 | 311.7 | +211.7% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GRAF vs KKR vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GRAF is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 4.0% vs KKR's 0.0%
KKR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 6.8% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
- Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 1.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.94, current ratio 0.52x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs KKR's -11.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 38.8x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.34 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs KKR's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs KKR's 1.58 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs KKR's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.8% vs KKR's -22.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs KKR's 0.4% |
GRAF vs KKR vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GRAF vs KKR vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and GRAF operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KKR's 12.4%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $19.0B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $9.0B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $2.4B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$393,929 | $7.5B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +22.5% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +12.3% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +12.4% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +39.5% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -70.1% | -1.7% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 61% valuation discount to KKR's 41.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs GRAF's 2.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $312M | $85.8B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $312M | $140.6B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 38.79x | 41.13x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.97x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.34x | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 19.73x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 4.45x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.33x | 1.13x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.01x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — GRAF and KKR and JPM each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $3 for KKR. KKR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KKR scores 6/9 vs GRAF's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.5% | +3.2% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.3% | +0.6% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.6% | +0.3% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.8% | +0.1% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.67x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$699 | $54.8B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $699 | $6M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $54.8B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.29x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,012 for KKR. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +21.8% total return vs KKR's -22.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs KKR's 20.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.9% | -25.0% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.9% | -22.6% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +76.7% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +80.1% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.1% | +682.0% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +20.9% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GRAF and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GRAF is the less volatile stock with a -0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KKR's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs KKR's 62.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.03x | 1.58x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.85 | $153.87 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.26 | $82.67 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.6% | +62.5% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.7 | 48.8 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 59K | 4.2M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KKR as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.7% upside for KKR (target: $141) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, JPM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.86% vs KKR's 0.84%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $141.14 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 27 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 6 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.80 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | +3.9% |
JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
GRAF vs KKR vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GRAF or KKR or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 0% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GRAF or KKR or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus KKR & Co. Inc. at 41. 1x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GRAF or KKR or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +80. 1% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KKR returned +682. 0% versus GRAF's +14. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GRAF or KKR or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Graf Global Corp.
(GRAF) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 03β versus KKR & Co. Inc. 's 1. 58β — meaning KKR is approximately -5560% more volatile than GRAF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GRAF or KKR or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -11. 0% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: JPMorgan Chase & Co. grew EPS 1. 5% year-over-year, compared to -36. 4% for Graf Global Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GRAF or KKR or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 0. 0% for Graf Global Corp. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 0. 0% for GRAF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GRAF or KKR or JPM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for KKR & Co. Inc. — 1. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KKR: 46. 7% to $141. 14.
08Which pays a better dividend — GRAF or KKR or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield), KKR (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. GRAF does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GRAF or KKR or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Graf Global Corp.
(GRAF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 03)). KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GRAF: +14. 1%, KKR: +682. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GRAF and KKR and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GRAF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. KKR, JPM pay a dividend while GRAF does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.