Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
HWBK vs CZWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
HWBK vs CZWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $260M | $207M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $112M | $90M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $24M | $14M |
| Gross Margin | 71.3% | 54.7% |
| Operating Margin | 26.0% | 7.0% |
| Forward P/E | 11.0x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $155M | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $105M | $119M |
HWBK vs CZWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hawthorn Bancshares… (HWBK) | 100 | 215.4 | +115.4% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 312.8 | +212.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HWBK vs CZWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HWBK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 2.1%
- Rev growth 2.2%, EPS growth 31.4%
- 301.1% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 149.0%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +52.1% vs HWBK's +35.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.2% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.0x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.93 vs 2.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs CZWI's 0.50 | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.1% vs HWBK's +35.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs CZWI's 0.5% |
HWBK vs CZWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HWBK vs CZWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HWBK leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HWBK and CZWI operate at a comparable scale, with $112M and $90M in trailing revenue. HWBK is the more profitable business, keeping 21.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZWI's 16.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $112M | $90M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $31M | $9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $24M | $14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $23M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.3% | +54.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.0% | +7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.2% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.4% | +12.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.4% | +63.0% |
Valuation Metrics
HWBK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.0x trailing earnings, HWBK trades at a 25% valuation discount to CZWI's 14.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HWBK offers better value at 0.93x vs CZWI's 2.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $260M | $207M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $310M | $140M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.99x | 14.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.93x | 2.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.89x | 15.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.32x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.51x | 1.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.37x | 19.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HWBK leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HWBK delivers a 14.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. CZWI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HWBK's 0.89x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.7% | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.1% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.2% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.89x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $50M | -$67M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $105M | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $155M | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.92x | 0.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HWBK five years ago would be worth $19,534 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,900 for CZWI. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +52.1% total return vs HWBK's +35.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs HWBK's 30.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.0% | +24.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.8% | +52.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +123.4% | +153.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.3% | +69.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +301.1% | +149.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.7% | +36.4% |
Risk & Volatility
HWBK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HWBK is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CZWI's 0.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HWBK currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs CZWI's 94.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.35x | 0.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.98 | $22.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.07 | $12.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.3% | +94.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.4 | 51.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 41K |
Analyst Outlook
HWBK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, HWBK offers the higher dividend yield at 2.06% vs CZWI's 1.73%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.78 | $0.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | +3.0% |
HWBK leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CZWI leads in 1 (Total Returns).
HWBK vs CZWI: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HWBK or CZWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
(HWBK) is the stronger pick with 2. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. (HWBK) offers the better valuation at 11. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HWBK or CZWI?
On trailing P/E, Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
(HWBK) is the cheapest at 11. 0x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. at 14. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HWBK or CZWI?
Over the past 5 years, Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
(HWBK) delivered a total return of +95. 3%, compared to +69. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HWBK returned +301. 1% versus CZWI's +149. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HWBK or CZWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
(HWBK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 50β — meaning CZWI is approximately 43% more volatile than HWBK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 89% for Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HWBK or CZWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
(HWBK) is pulling ahead at 2. 2% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 31. 4% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HWBK or CZWI?
Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
(HWBK) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 2% net margin versus 16. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HWBK leads at 26. 0% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HWBK leads at 71. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — HWBK or CZWI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. (HWBK) offers the highest yield at 2. 1%, versus 1. 7% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
08Is HWBK or CZWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
(HWBK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), 2. 1% yield, +301. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HWBK: +301. 1%, CZWI: +149. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between HWBK and CZWI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.