Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
IMA logo
IMA
KYMR logo
KYMR
IMVT logo
IMVT
ARQT logo
ARQT
CRL logo
CRL
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

IMA vs KYMR vs IMVT vs ARQT vs CRL vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
IMA
ImageneBio Inc

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$61M
5Y Perf.-98.4%
KYMR
Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.04B
5Y Perf.+121.8%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.90B
5Y Perf.+109.6%
ARQT
Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.05B
5Y Perf.-15.7%
CRL
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$9.03B
5Y Perf.-35.3%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+110.7%

IMA vs KYMR vs IMVT vs ARQT vs CRL vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
IMA logoIMA
KYMR logoKYMR
IMVT logoIMVT
ARQT logoARQT
CRL logoCRL
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$61M$7.04B$6.90B$3.05B$9.03B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$51M$0.00$416M$4.03B$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$-45M$-315M$-506M$-2M$-185M$57.05B
Gross Margin-29.1%33.2%90.9%31.9%60.0%
Operating Margin-60.6%-7.0%0.8%11.8%25.9%
Forward P/E122.5x16.9x14.4x
Total Debt$10M$82M$72K$6M$3.07B$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$35M$357M$902M$43M$214M$343.34B

IMA vs KYMR vs IMVT vs ARQT vs CRL vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

IMA
KYMR
IMVT
ARQT
CRL
JPM
StockMar 21Jun 26Return
ImageneBio Inc (IMA)1001.6-98.4%
Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR)100221.8+121.8%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)100209.6+109.6%
Arcutis Biotherapeu… (ARQT)10084.3-15.7%
Charles River Labor… (CRL)10064.7-35.3%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100210.7+110.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: IMA vs KYMR vs IMVT vs ARQT vs CRL vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 4 of 7 categories (6-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. ImageneBio Inc is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. IMVT and ARQT also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
IMA
ImageneBio Inc
The Defensive Pick

IMA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 7.5%, current ratio 12.49x
  • Beta 0.83, current ratio 12.49x
  • Beta 0.83 vs IMVT's 1.66
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
KYMR
Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 6 stocks, KYMR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

IMVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +110.9% vs IMA's -67.0%
Best for: momentum
ARQT
Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
The Growth Play

ARQT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 91.3%, EPS growth 88.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 367.3%
  • 91.3% revenue growth vs IMA's -77.1%
Best for: growth exposure
CRL
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

CRL doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 237.9%
  • Lower P/E (14.4x vs 16.9x)
  • 20.4% margin vs IMA's -56.7%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthARQT logoARQT91.3% revenue growth vs IMA's -77.1%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.4x vs 16.9x)
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs IMA's -56.7%
Stability / SafetyIMA logoIMABeta 0.83 vs IMVT's 1.66
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 5 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)IMVT logoIMVT+110.9% vs IMA's -67.0%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPM1.3% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2%

IMA vs KYMR vs IMVT vs ARQT vs CRL vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

IMAImageneBio Inc

Segment breakdown not available.

KYMRKymera Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ARQTArcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
FY 2023
Other Revenue
51.0%$30M
Product
49.0%$29M
CRLCharles River Laboratories International, Inc.
FY 2025
Discovery and Safety Assessment
59.8%$2.4B
Research Models and Services
21.1%$846M
Manufacturing Support
19.1%$766M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

IMA vs KYMR vs IMVT vs ARQT vs CRL vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGCRL

Who Leads Where

JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories

IMVT leads 1 • IMA leads 0 • KYMR leads 0 • ARQT leads 0 • CRL leads 0 • 3 tied

Explore the data ↓
CRLCharles River Laborat…
0leads
ARQTArcutis Biotherapeuti…
0leads
KYMRKymera Therapeutics, …
0leads
IMAImageneBio Inc
0leads
IMVTImmunovant, Inc.
1leads
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
2leads
6 Total Categories

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — ARQT and JPM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IMA's -56.7%. On growth, ARQT holds the edge at +60.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricIMA logoIMAImageneBio IncKYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$51M$0$416M$4.0B$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$53M-$352M-$532M$6M$824M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$45M-$315M-$506M-$2M-$185M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$52M-$244M-$407M$27M$391M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-29.1%+33.2%+90.9%+31.9%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-60.6%-7.0%+0.8%+11.8%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-56.7%-6.1%-0.6%-4.6%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-59.8%-4.7%+6.5%+9.7%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+55.5%+60.1%+1.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-4.3%+13.4%-14.1%+55.0%-160.0%+16.0%
Evenly matched — ARQT and JPM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — CRL and JPM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, CRL's 13.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JPM's 18.4x.

MetricIMA logoIMAImageneBio IncKYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$61M$7.0B$6.9B$3.0B$9.0B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$36M$6.8B$6.0B$3.0B$11.9B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.50x-23.36x-12.14x-187.54x-64.44x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.122.45x16.90x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.04x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue76.54x179.54x8.11x2.25x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.20x4.61x7.19x16.37x2.89x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF17.42x8.88x
Evenly matched — CRL and JPM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-68 for IMVT. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricIMA logoIMAImageneBio IncKYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-35.2%-25.0%-68.2%-1.4%-5.7%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-31.3%-22.3%-62.2%-0.6%-2.5%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-35.9%-24.9%-5.2%+6.3%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-35.6%-27.2%-68.3%-4.3%+8.1%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9242445
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.08x0.05x0.00x0.03x0.95x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$25M-$275M-$902M-$37M$2.9B$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$35M$357M$902M$43M$214M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$10M$82M$72,000$6M$3.1B$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-560.22x-2119.53x2.08x4.29x0.74x
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

IMVT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $31,304 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $330 for IMA. Over the past 12 months, IMVT leads with a +110.9% total return vs IMA's -67.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KYMR at 50.8% vs IMA's -59.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricIMA logoIMAImageneBio IncKYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-19.7%+18.5%+29.8%-15.9%-7.4%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-67.0%+82.3%+110.9%+80.6%+23.5%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-93.3%+242.9%+55.0%+138.8%-8.7%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.7%+70.4%+213.0%-16.2%-47.2%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.6%+159.2%+237.9%+11.8%+122.4%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-59.4%+50.8%+15.7%+33.7%-3.0%+33.6%
IMVT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — IMA and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

IMA is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMVT's 1.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs IMA's 30.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricIMA logoIMAImageneBio IncKYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.83x0.91x1.66x1.45x1.39x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$18.00$103.00$36.27$31.77$228.88$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.36$36.65$14.32$12.72$143.06$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+30.2%+83.7%+92.7%+76.7%+81.9%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.856.857.966.460.859.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded432K492K1.9M1.5M767K7.0M
Evenly matched — IMA and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: KYMR as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", ARQT as "Buy", CRL as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.5% upside for ARQT (target: $34) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricIMA logoIMAImageneBio IncKYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$112.60$43.67$34.00$213.17$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts2623123761
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises115
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+4.0%+3.9%
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). IMVT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

IMA vs KYMR vs IMVT vs ARQT vs CRL vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is IMA or KYMR or IMVT or ARQT or CRL or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.

(ARQT) is the stronger pick with 91. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -77. 1% for ImageneBio Inc (IMA). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — IMA or KYMR or IMVT or ARQT or CRL or JPM?

On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

is actually cheaper at 14. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — IMA or KYMR or IMVT or ARQT or CRL or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.

(IMVT) delivered a total return of +213. 0%, compared to -96. 7% for ImageneBio Inc (IMA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus IMA's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — IMA or KYMR or IMVT or ARQT or CRL or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ImageneBio Inc (IMA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

83β versus Immunovant, Inc. 's 1. 66β — meaning IMVT is approximately 99% more volatile than IMA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — IMA or KYMR or IMVT or ARQT or CRL or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.

(ARQT) is pulling ahead at 91. 3% versus -77. 1% for ImageneBio Inc (IMA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 88. 8% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARQT leads at 367. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — IMA or KYMR or IMVT or ARQT or CRL or JPM?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -56. 7% for ImageneBio Inc — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -60. 6% for IMA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is IMA or KYMR or IMVT or ARQT or CRL or JPM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 122. 5x for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — 108. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ARQT: 39. 5% to $34. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — IMA or KYMR or IMVT or ARQT or CRL or JPM?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. IMA, KYMR, IMVT, ARQT, CRL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is IMA or KYMR or IMVT or ARQT or CRL or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a higher beta of 1. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, IMVT: +237. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between IMA and KYMR and IMVT and ARQT and CRL and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (IMA (Healthcare) and KYMR (Healthcare) and IMVT (Healthcare) and ARQT (Healthcare) and CRL (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: IMA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARQT is a small-cap high-growth stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while IMA, KYMR, IMVT, ARQT, CRL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.