Regulated Electric
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
IMSR vs BWXT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
IMSR vs BWXT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Electric | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $625M | $17.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $3.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-46M | $345M |
| Gross Margin | — | 16.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | 11.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 41.3x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $2.02B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $97M | $503M |
Quick Verdict: IMSR vs BWXT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IMSR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 4.60, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 50.62x
BWXT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.88, yield 0.5%
- Rev growth 18.3%, EPS growth 16.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.7%
- 474.2% 10Y total return vs IMSR's -66.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.3% revenue growth vs IMSR's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.2% margin vs IMSR's -1.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.88 vs IMSR's 4.60 | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.6% vs IMSR's -66.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.6% ROA vs IMSR's -21.0%, ROIC 10.1% vs -18.8% |
IMSR vs BWXT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IMSR vs BWXT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BWXT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BWXT and IMSR operate at a comparable scale, with $3.4B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$38M | $458M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$46M | $345M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$242M | $328M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +16.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +11.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +10.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +26.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -60.3% | +20.7% |
Valuation Metrics
IMSR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $625M | $17.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $530M | $19.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -19.38x | 54.02x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 41.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 12.59x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 44.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 5.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.83x | 14.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 60.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BWXT leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BWXT delivers a 27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-23 for IMSR. IMSR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BWXT's 1.63x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -23.4% | +27.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -21.0% | +8.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -18.8% | +10.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.7% | +10.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 1.63x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$95M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $97M | $503M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $2.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.45x | 10.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BWXT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BWXT five years ago would be worth $31,211 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,332 for IMSR. Over the past 12 months, BWXT leads with a +39.6% total return vs IMSR's -66.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BWXT at 42.7% vs IMSR's -30.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.8% | +6.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -66.7% | +39.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.7% | +190.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.7% | +212.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.7% | +474.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -30.7% | +42.7% |
Risk & Volatility
BWXT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BWXT is the less volatile stock with a 1.88 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMSR's 4.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BWXT currently trades 80.2% from its 52-week high vs IMSR's 27.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 4.60x | 1.88x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.16 | $241.82 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.33 | $133.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.8% | +80.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.8 | 46.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.0M | 915K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Consensus price targets imply 78.6% upside for IMSR (target: $14) vs 16.0% for BWXT (target: $225). BWXT is the only dividend payer here at 0.52% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.50 | $225.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% |
BWXT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IMSR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
IMSR vs BWXT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IMSR or BWXT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BWX Technologies, Inc.
(BWXT) is the stronger pick with 18. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR). BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) offers the better valuation at 54. 0x trailing P/E (41. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — IMSR or BWXT?
Over the past 5 years, BWX Technologies, Inc.
(BWXT) delivered a total return of +212. 1%, compared to -66. 7% for Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BWXT returned +474. 2% versus IMSR's -66. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — IMSR or BWXT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BWX Technologies, Inc.
(BWXT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 88β versus Terrestrial Energy Inc. 's 4. 60β — meaning IMSR is approximately 144% more volatile than BWXT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 163% for BWX Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — IMSR or BWXT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BWX Technologies, Inc.
(BWXT) is pulling ahead at 18. 3% versus -100. 0% for Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BWX Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 16. 9% year-over-year, compared to -200. 0% for Terrestrial Energy Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — IMSR or BWXT?
BWX Technologies, Inc.
(BWXT) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 3% net margin versus 0. 0% for Terrestrial Energy Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BWXT leads at 10. 1% versus 0. 0% for IMSR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BWXT leads at 22. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is IMSR or BWXT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IMSR: 78.
6% to $13. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — IMSR or BWXT?
In this comparison, BWXT (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. IMSR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is IMSR or BWXT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BWX Technologies, Inc.
(BWXT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 5% yield, +474. 2% 10Y return). Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR) carries a higher beta of 4. 60 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BWXT: +474. 2%, IMSR: -66. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between IMSR and BWXT?
These companies operate in different sectors (IMSR (Energy) and BWXT (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IMSR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BWXT is a mid-cap high-growth stock. BWXT pays a dividend while IMSR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.