Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
IMUX vs ABBV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
IMUX vs ABBV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $129M | $397.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $61.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-104M | $4.23B |
| Gross Margin | — | 70.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 26.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.8x |
| Total Debt | $684K | $69.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $5.23B |
IMUX vs ABBV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immunic, Inc. (IMUX) | 100 | 10.8 | -89.2% |
| AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) | 100 | 228.9 | +128.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IMUX vs ABBV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IMUX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- EPS growth 37.6%
- +50.2% vs ABBV's +20.9%
ABBV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 43 yrs, beta 0.15, yield 2.9%
- 357.3% 10Y total return vs IMUX's -99.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.15, current ratio 0.67x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.6% revenue growth vs IMUX's -8.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.9% margin vs IMUX's 4.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.15 vs IMUX's 1.68 | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield; 43-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +50.2% vs ABBV's +20.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.1% ROA vs IMUX's -132.0% |
IMUX vs ABBV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IMUX vs ABBV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV and IMUX operate at a comparable scale, with $61.2B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $61.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$109M | $24.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$104M | $4.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$81M | $18.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +70.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +26.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +30.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +56.8% | +57.4% |
Valuation Metrics
IMUX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $129M | $397.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $114M | $461.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.09x | 94.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 16.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 6.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 22.32x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-2 for IMUX. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABBV scores 6/9 vs IMUX's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.2% | +62.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -132.0% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +23.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -17.0% | +21.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$15M | $63.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $5.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $684,000 | $69.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ABBV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ABBV five years ago would be worth $22,106 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $920 for IMUX. Over the past 12 months, IMUX leads with a +50.2% total return vs ABBV's +20.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ABBV at 21.0% vs IMUX's -8.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +124.2% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +50.2% | +20.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.7% | +77.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.8% | +121.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +357.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.2% | +21.0% |
Risk & Volatility
ABBV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMUX's 1.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ABBV currently trades 91.8% from its 52-week high vs IMUX's 82.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.68x | 0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.77 | $244.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.67 | $181.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.9% | +91.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.3 | 63.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 289K | 4.6M |
Analyst Outlook
ABBV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates IMUX as "Buy" and ABBV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.6% upside for ABBV (target: $258) vs 10.9% for IMUX (target: $15). ABBV is the only dividend payer here at 2.92% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.50 | $257.54 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 43 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.57 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% |
ABBV leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IMUX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
IMUX vs ABBV: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IMUX or ABBV a better buy right now?
AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) offers the better valuation at 94. 8x trailing P/E (15. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Immunic, Inc. (IMUX) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — IMUX or ABBV?
Over the past 5 years, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) delivered a total return of +121. 1%, compared to -90. 8% for Immunic, Inc. (IMUX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABBV returned +357. 3% versus IMUX's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — IMUX or ABBV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 15β versus Immunic, Inc. 's 1. 68β — meaning IMUX is approximately 1055% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — IMUX or ABBV?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Immunic, Inc.
grew EPS 37. 6% year-over-year, compared to -0. 8% for AbbVie Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — IMUX or ABBV?
AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 9% net margin versus 0. 0% for Immunic, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABBV leads at 32. 8% versus 0. 0% for IMUX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ABBV leads at 70. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is IMUX or ABBV more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ABBV: 14.
6% to $257. 54.
07Which pays a better dividend — IMUX or ABBV?
In this comparison, ABBV (2.
9% yield) pays a dividend. IMUX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is IMUX or ABBV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 15), 2. 9% yield, +357. 3% 10Y return). Immunic, Inc. (IMUX) carries a higher beta of 1. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +357. 3%, IMUX: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between IMUX and ABBV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
ABBV pays a dividend while IMUX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.