Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
JBIO vs DAWN vs KO vs RCUS vs IMVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
JBIO vs DAWN vs KO vs RCUS vs IMVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $500M | $2.22B | $355.61B | $2.40B | $6.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $158M | $49.28B | $236M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-130M | $-107M | $13.70B | $-369M | $-506M |
| Gross Margin | — | 89.1% | 61.7% | 90.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -80.8% | 29.3% | -168.6% | — |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 25.3x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $724K | $3M | $45.49B | $99M | $72K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $88M | $197M | $10.27B | $222M | $902M |
JBIO vs DAWN vs KO vs RCUS vs IMVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jade Biosciences, I… (JBIO) | 100 | 1.9 | -98.1% |
| Day One Biopharmace… (DAWN) | 100 | 94.2 | -5.8% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 152.7 | +52.7% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 86.7 | -13.3% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 318.1 | +218.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JBIO vs DAWN vs KO vs RCUS vs IMVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JBIO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.60
- Lower volatility, beta 1.60, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 20.33x
- Beta 1.60, current ratio 20.33x
- 141.8% revenue growth vs IMVT's -22.2%
DAWN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability and momentum is your priority.
- Beta 0.14 vs RCUS's 2.00, lower leverage
- +221.8% vs KO's +17.2%
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 1.9%, EPS growth 23.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
- 27.8% margin vs RCUS's -156.4%
- 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- 13.1% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2%
RCUS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 237.9% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 141.8% revenue growth vs IMVT's -22.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs RCUS's -156.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs RCUS's 2.00, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +221.8% vs KO's +17.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2% |
JBIO vs DAWN vs KO vs RCUS vs IMVT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
JBIO vs DAWN vs KO vs RCUS vs IMVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories
DAWN leads 1 • JBIO leads 0 • RCUS leads 0 • IMVT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $49.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RCUS's -156.4%. On growth, DAWN holds the edge at +83.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $158M | $49.3B | $236M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$134M | -$124M | $15.5B | -$391M | -$532M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$130M | -$107M | $13.7B | -$369M | -$506M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$117M | -$108M | $12.6B | -$489M | -$407M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +89.1% | +61.7% | +90.7% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -80.8% | +29.3% | -168.6% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -67.8% | +27.8% | -156.4% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -68.0% | +25.5% | -2.1% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +83.9% | +12.1% | -39.3% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +70.0% | +18.2% | +10.5% | -14.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — JBIO and DAWN and KO each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $500M | $2.2B | $355.6B | $2.4B | $6.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $413M | $2.0B | $390.8B | $2.3B | $6.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.78x | -20.70x | 27.18x | -7.23x | -12.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 25.27x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.43x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 26.39x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 14.06x | 7.42x | 9.70x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.45x | 5.05x | 10.40x | 4.05x | 7.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 67.15x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-69 for RCUS. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -51.3% | -23.4% | +41.1% | -69.0% | -68.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -47.3% | -20.7% | +13.1% | -35.3% | -62.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -59.2% | -30.5% | +15.8% | -64.1% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -55.4% | -26.7% | +17.3% | -42.1% | -68.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.01x | 1.33x | 0.16x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$88M | -$194M | $35.2B | -$123M | -$902M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $88M | $197M | $10.3B | $222M | $902M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $724,000 | $3M | $45.5B | $99M | $72,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 10.70x | -13.38x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DAWN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $31,304 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $222 for JBIO. Over the past 12 months, DAWN leads with a +221.8% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DAWN at 19.7% vs JBIO's -68.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.3% | +143.3% | +20.3% | +2.2% | +29.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +121.0% | +221.8% | +17.2% | +154.5% | +110.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.8% | +71.7% | +47.0% | +18.3% | +55.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | +5.0% | +65.6% | -3.1% | +213.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | -8.4% | +121.1% | +40.0% | +237.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -68.1% | +19.7% | +13.7% | +5.8% | +15.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DAWN and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 2.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DAWN currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs JBIO's 54.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.60x | 0.14x | -0.20x | 2.00x | 1.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.96 | $21.53 | $84.04 | $28.72 | $36.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.57 | $5.64 | $65.35 | $7.91 | $14.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.9% | +100.0% | +98.3% | +82.9% | +92.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.5 | 80.3 | 60.6 | 46.5 | 57.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 826K | 1.4M | 12.7M | 1.1M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JBIO as "Buy", DAWN as "Buy", KO as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 188.1% upside for JBIO (target: $44) vs -0.1% for DAWN (target: $22). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $44.20 | $21.50 | $86.13 | $31.00 | $43.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 12 | 48 | 18 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.5% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 56 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.04 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DAWN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
JBIO vs DAWN vs KO vs RCUS vs IMVT: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JBIO or DAWN or KO or RCUS or IMVT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is the stronger pick with 20. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 27. 2x trailing P/E (25. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Jade Biosciences, Inc. (JBIO) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — JBIO or DAWN or KO or RCUS or IMVT?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +213. 0%, compared to -97. 8% for Jade Biosciences, Inc. (JBIO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +237. 9% versus JBIO's -97. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — JBIO or DAWN or KO or RCUS or IMVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 2. 00β — meaning RCUS is approximately -1098% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — JBIO or DAWN or KO or RCUS or IMVT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is pulling ahead at 20. 6% versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Jade Biosciences, Inc. grew EPS 95. 2% year-over-year, compared to -4. 8% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCUS leads at 30. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — JBIO or DAWN or KO or RCUS or IMVT?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -142. 9% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -156. 3% for RCUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCUS leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is JBIO or DAWN or KO or RCUS or IMVT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JBIO: 188.
1% to $44. 20.
07Which pays a better dividend — JBIO or DAWN or KO or RCUS or IMVT?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. JBIO, DAWN, RCUS, IMVT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is JBIO or DAWN or KO or RCUS or IMVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a higher beta of 2. 00 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, RCUS: +40. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between JBIO and DAWN and KO and RCUS and IMVT?
These companies operate in different sectors (JBIO (Healthcare) and DAWN (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and RCUS (Healthcare) and IMVT (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: JBIO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DAWN is a small-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. KO pays a dividend while JBIO, DAWN, RCUS, IMVT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.