Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
JBIO vs DAWN vs RCUS vs IMVT vs KYMR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
JBIO vs DAWN vs RCUS vs IMVT vs KYMR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $500M | $2.22B | $2.40B | $6.90B | $7.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $158M | $236M | $0.00 | $51M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-130M | $-107M | $-369M | $-506M | $-315M |
| Gross Margin | — | 89.1% | 90.7% | — | 33.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | -80.8% | -168.6% | — | -7.0% |
| Total Debt | $724K | $3M | $99M | $72K | $82M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $88M | $197M | $222M | $902M | $357M |
JBIO vs DAWN vs RCUS vs IMVT vs KYMR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jade Biosciences, I… (JBIO) | 100 | 1.9 | -98.1% |
| Day One Biopharmace… (DAWN) | 100 | 94.2 | -5.8% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 86.7 | -13.3% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 318.1 | +218.1% |
| Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR) | 100 | 177.7 | +77.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JBIO vs DAWN vs RCUS vs IMVT vs KYMR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JBIO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.60, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 20.33x
- 141.8% revenue growth vs IMVT's -22.2%
DAWN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.14
- Rev growth 20.6%, EPS growth -2.0%
- Beta 0.14 vs RCUS's 2.00, lower leverage
- +221.8% vs KYMR's +82.3%
RCUS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
IMVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 237.9% 10Y total return vs KYMR's 159.2%
- 2.6% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
KYMR is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.91, current ratio 10.47x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 141.8% revenue growth vs IMVT's -22.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.6% margin vs KYMR's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs RCUS's 2.00, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +221.8% vs KYMR's +82.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -20.7% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2% |
JBIO vs DAWN vs RCUS vs IMVT vs KYMR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
JBIO vs DAWN vs RCUS vs IMVT vs KYMR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DAWN leads in 3 of 6 categories
JBIO leads 0 • RCUS leads 0 • IMVT leads 0 • KYMR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DAWN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCUS and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $236M and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -67.8% (DAWN) to -6.1% (KYMR). On growth, DAWN holds the edge at +83.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $158M | $236M | $0 | $51M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$134M | -$124M | -$391M | -$532M | -$352M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$130M | -$107M | -$369M | -$506M | -$315M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$117M | -$108M | -$489M | -$407M | -$244M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +89.1% | +90.7% | — | +33.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -80.8% | -168.6% | — | -7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -67.8% | -156.4% | — | -6.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -68.0% | -2.1% | — | -4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +83.9% | -39.3% | — | +55.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +70.0% | +10.5% | -14.1% | +13.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — JBIO and RCUS and KYMR each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $500M | $2.2B | $2.4B | $6.9B | $7.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $413M | $2.0B | $2.3B | $6.0B | $6.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.78x | -20.70x | -7.23x | -12.14x | -23.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 14.06x | 9.70x | — | 179.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.45x | 5.05x | 4.05x | 7.19x | 4.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DAWN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DAWN delivers a -23.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-23 in annual profit, vs $-69 for RCUS. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RCUS's 0.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DAWN scores 4/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -51.3% | -23.4% | -69.0% | -68.2% | -25.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -47.3% | -20.7% | -35.3% | -62.2% | -22.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -59.2% | -30.5% | -64.1% | — | -24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -55.4% | -26.7% | -42.1% | -68.3% | -27.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.01x | 0.16x | 0.00x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$88M | -$194M | -$123M | -$902M | -$275M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $88M | $197M | $222M | $902M | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $724,000 | $3M | $99M | $72,000 | $82M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | -13.38x | — | -2119.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — DAWN and IMVT and KYMR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $31,304 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $222 for JBIO. Over the past 12 months, DAWN leads with a +221.8% total return vs KYMR's +82.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KYMR at 50.8% vs JBIO's -68.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.3% | +143.3% | +2.2% | +29.8% | +18.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +121.0% | +221.8% | +154.5% | +110.9% | +82.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.8% | +71.7% | +18.3% | +55.0% | +242.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | +5.0% | -3.1% | +213.0% | +70.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | -8.4% | +40.0% | +237.9% | +159.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -68.1% | +19.7% | +5.8% | +15.7% | +50.8% |
Risk & Volatility
DAWN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DAWN is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 2.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DAWN currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs JBIO's 54.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.60x | 0.14x | 2.00x | 1.66x | 0.91x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.96 | $21.53 | $28.72 | $36.27 | $103.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.57 | $5.64 | $7.91 | $14.32 | $36.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.9% | +100.0% | +82.9% | +92.7% | +83.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.5 | 80.3 | 46.5 | 57.9 | 56.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 826K | 1.4M | 1.1M | 1.9M | 492K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JBIO as "Buy", DAWN as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 188.1% upside for JBIO (target: $44) vs -0.1% for DAWN (target: $22).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $44.20 | $21.50 | $31.00 | $43.67 | $112.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 12 | 18 | 23 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
DAWN leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
JBIO vs DAWN vs RCUS vs IMVT vs KYMR: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JBIO or DAWN or RCUS or IMVT or KYMR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is the stronger pick with 20. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). Analysts rate Jade Biosciences, Inc. (JBIO) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — JBIO or DAWN or RCUS or IMVT or KYMR?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +213. 0%, compared to -97. 8% for Jade Biosciences, Inc. (JBIO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +237. 9% versus JBIO's -97. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — JBIO or DAWN or RCUS or IMVT or KYMR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 14β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 2. 00β — meaning RCUS is approximately 1302% more volatile than DAWN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 16% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — JBIO or DAWN or RCUS or IMVT or KYMR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is pulling ahead at 20. 6% versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Jade Biosciences, Inc. grew EPS 95. 2% year-over-year, compared to -23. 8% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCUS leads at 30. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — JBIO or DAWN or RCUS or IMVT or KYMR?
Jade Biosciences, Inc.
(JBIO) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JBIO leads at 0. 0% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — JBIO or DAWN or RCUS or IMVT or KYMR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is JBIO or DAWN or RCUS or IMVT or KYMR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 14)). Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a higher beta of 2. 00 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DAWN: -8. 4%, RCUS: +40. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between JBIO and DAWN and RCUS and IMVT and KYMR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: JBIO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DAWN is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.