Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
KGEI vs VTLE vs MTDR vs CIVI vs SM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
KGEI vs VTLE vs MTDR vs CIVI vs SM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $190M | $693M | $6.72B | $2.34B | $3.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $64M | $1.90B | $3.36B | $4.71B | $3.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $-1.31B | $483M | $638M | $131M |
| Gross Margin | 58.3% | 44.2% | 102.0% | 43.9% | 45.1% |
| Operating Margin | 45.9% | -58.3% | 34.3% | 31.1% | 6.5% |
| Forward P/E | 7.3x | 4.0x | 6.9x | 6.8x | 4.1x |
| Total Debt | $50M | $2.55B | $3.55B | $4.49B | $2.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $40M | $79M | $76M | $368M |
KGEI vs VTLE vs MTDR vs CIVI vs SM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 23 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kolibri Global Ener… (KGEI) | 100 | 125.2 | +25.2% |
| Vital Energy, Inc. (VTLE) | 100 | 35.8 | -64.2% |
| Matador Resources C… (MTDR) | 100 | 87.6 | -12.4% |
| Civitas Resources, … (CIVI) | 100 | 35.9 | -64.1% |
| SM Energy Company (SM) | 100 | 77.3 | -22.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KGEI vs VTLE vs MTDR vs CIVI vs SM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KGEI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 21.7% margin vs VTLE's -69.3%
- 4.9% ROA vs VTLE's -27.9%, ROIC 7.5% vs -0.3%
VTLE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (4.0x vs 4.1x)
MTDR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 162.6% 10Y total return vs SM's 137.1%
CIVI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 18.2%
- Rev growth 49.8%, EPS growth -6.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 77.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.70, Low D/E 67.8%, current ratio 0.45x
- Beta 0.70, yield 18.2%, current ratio 0.45x
SM is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +18.7% vs KGEI's -23.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 49.8% revenue growth vs KGEI's -22.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.0x vs 4.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.7% margin vs VTLE's -69.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs VTLE's 0.97, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 18.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs MTDR's 2.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.7% vs KGEI's -23.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.9% ROA vs VTLE's -27.9%, ROIC 7.5% vs -0.3% |
KGEI vs VTLE vs MTDR vs CIVI vs SM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KGEI vs VTLE vs MTDR vs CIVI vs SM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KGEI leads in 2 of 6 categories
VTLE leads 1 • MTDR leads 0 • CIVI leads 0 • SM leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KGEI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIVI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 74.1x KGEI's $64M. KGEI is the more profitable business, keeping 21.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VTLE's -69.3%. On growth, SM holds the edge at +76.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $64M | $1.9B | $3.4B | $4.7B | $3.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $47M | -$334M | $2.4B | $3.4B | $1.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | -$1.3B | $483M | $638M | $131M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | $656M | $59M | $934M | -$226M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.3% | +44.2% | +102.0% | +43.9% | +45.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +45.9% | -58.3% | +34.3% | +31.1% | +6.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | -69.3% | +14.4% | +13.6% | +3.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -22.8% | +34.6% | +1.8% | +19.8% | -5.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.9% | -8.4% | -33.2% | -8.1% | +76.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.3% | -2.6% | -115.1% | -33.9% | -2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
VTLE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.2x trailing earnings, CIVI trades at a 74% valuation discount to KGEI's 12.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CIVI's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KGEI's 5.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $190M | $693M | $6.7B | $2.3B | $3.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $238M | $3.2B | $10.2B | $6.8B | $5.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.47x | -3.78x | 8.88x | 3.24x | 5.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.34x | 3.98x | 6.95x | 6.75x | 4.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.15x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.82x | 4.46x | 4.26x | 1.89x | 2.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.29x | 0.36x | 1.84x | 0.45x | 1.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.96x | 0.24x | 1.12x | 0.41x | 0.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 27.79x | 2.61x | 6.25x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KGEI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CIVI delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-75 for VTLE. KGEI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VTLE's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SM scores 7/9 vs MTDR's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.8% | -74.8% | +8.2% | +9.5% | +2.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.9% | -27.9% | +4.1% | +4.2% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.5% | -0.3% | +10.5% | +10.8% | +8.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.3% | -0.5% | +11.5% | +12.1% | +10.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | 0.95x | 0.59x | 0.68x | 0.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $48M | $2.5B | $3.5B | $4.4B | $1.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $40M | $79M | $76M | $368M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $50M | $2.6B | $3.5B | $4.5B | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.48x | -5.04x | 5.53x | 2.80x | 1.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — KGEI and MTDR and SM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MTDR five years ago would be worth $17,498 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,804 for VTLE. Over the past 12 months, SM leads with a +18.7% total return vs KGEI's -23.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KGEI at 12.4% vs VTLE's -25.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +36.7% | — | +26.4% | -1.5% | +65.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -23.8% | -11.1% | +12.1% | -7.8% | +18.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.2% | -58.0% | +15.0% | -43.2% | +19.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.2% | -72.0% | +75.0% | +3.1% | +59.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.2% | -91.9% | +162.6% | -81.2% | +137.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.4% | -25.1% | +4.8% | -17.2% | +6.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KGEI and SM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KGEI is the less volatile stock with a -0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VTLE's 0.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SM currently trades 86.8% from its 52-week high vs KGEI's 64.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.38x | 0.97x | -0.29x | 0.70x | -0.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.27 | $22.10 | $66.84 | $37.45 | $35.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.35 | $13.79 | $37.14 | $25.38 | $17.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.8% | +81.1% | +80.9% | +73.1% | +86.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.3 | 53.2 | 42.6 | 54.8 | 48.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 221K | 17 | 1.5M | 22.4M | 4.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MTDR and CIVI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KGEI as "Buy", VTLE as "Hold", MTDR as "Buy", CIVI as "Hold", SM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 155.1% upside for VTLE (target: $46) vs 13.0% for SM (target: $35). For income investors, CIVI offers the higher dividend yield at 18.19% vs MTDR's 2.42%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $45.71 | $72.00 | $33.00 | $35.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 36 | 42 | 16 | 54 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.4% | +18.2% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 5 | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.31 | $4.98 | $0.80 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +0.5% | +0.8% | +18.3% | +0.4% |
KGEI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VTLE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
KGEI vs VTLE vs MTDR vs CIVI vs SM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KGEI or VTLE or MTDR or CIVI or SM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the stronger pick with 49. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 4% for Kolibri Global Energy Inc. (KGEI). Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kolibri Global Energy Inc. (KGEI) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KGEI or VTLE or MTDR or CIVI or SM?
On trailing P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus Kolibri Global Energy Inc. at 12. 5x. On forward P/E, Vital Energy, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KGEI or VTLE or MTDR or CIVI or SM?
Over the past 5 years, Matador Resources Company (MTDR) delivered a total return of +75.
0%, compared to -72. 0% for Vital Energy, Inc. (VTLE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTDR returned +162. 6% versus VTLE's -91. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KGEI or VTLE or MTDR or CIVI or SM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kolibri Global Energy Inc.
(KGEI) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 38β versus Vital Energy, Inc. 's 0. 97β — meaning VTLE is approximately -353% more volatile than KGEI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kolibri Global Energy Inc. (KGEI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 95% for Vital Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KGEI or VTLE or MTDR or CIVI or SM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is pulling ahead at 49. 8% versus -22. 4% for Kolibri Global Energy Inc. (KGEI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Civitas Resources, Inc. grew EPS -6. 2% year-over-year, compared to -114. 2% for Vital Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIVI leads at 77. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KGEI or VTLE or MTDR or CIVI or SM?
Kolibri Global Energy Inc.
(KGEI) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 2% net margin versus -8. 9% for Vital Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KGEI leads at 40. 5% versus -1. 2% for VTLE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KGEI leads at 53. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KGEI or VTLE or MTDR or CIVI or SM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Vital Energy, Inc.
(VTLE) trades at 4. 0x forward P/E versus 7. 3x for Kolibri Global Energy Inc. — 3. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VTLE: 155. 1% to $45. 71.
08Which pays a better dividend — KGEI or VTLE or MTDR or CIVI or SM?
In this comparison, CIVI (18.
2% yield), SM (2. 6% yield), MTDR (2. 4% yield) pay a dividend. KGEI, VTLE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KGEI or VTLE or MTDR or CIVI or SM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Matador Resources Company (MTDR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
29), 2. 4% yield, +162. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTDR: +162. 6%, VTLE: -91. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KGEI and VTLE and MTDR and CIVI and SM?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KGEI is a small-cap deep-value stock; VTLE is a small-cap high-growth stock; MTDR is a small-cap deep-value stock; CIVI is a small-cap high-growth stock; SM is a small-cap high-growth stock. MTDR, CIVI, SM pay a dividend while KGEI, VTLE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.