Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
KLRS logo
KLRS
KYMR logo
KYMR
IMVT logo
IMVT
ARQT logo
ARQT
RCUS logo
RCUS
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

KLRS vs KYMR vs IMVT vs ARQT vs RCUS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
KLRS
Kalaris Therapeutics Inc

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$81M
5Y Perf.-46.1%
KYMR
Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.04B
5Y Perf.+215.0%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.90B
5Y Perf.+96.7%
ARQT
Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.05B
5Y Perf.+55.9%
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.40B
5Y Perf.+203.2%

KLRS vs KYMR vs IMVT vs ARQT vs RCUS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
KLRS logoKLRS
KYMR logoKYMR
IMVT logoIMVT
ARQT logoARQT
RCUS logoRCUS
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$81M$7.04B$6.90B$3.05B$2.40B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$51M$0.00$416M$236M
Net Income (TTM)$-44M$-315M$-506M$-2M$-369M
Gross Margin33.2%90.9%90.7%
Operating Margin-7.0%0.8%-168.6%
Forward P/E122.5x
Total Debt$1M$82M$72K$6M$99M
Cash & Equiv.$98M$357M$902M$43M$222M

KLRS vs KYMR vs IMVT vs ARQT vs RCUSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

KLRS
KYMR
IMVT
ARQT
RCUS
StockMar 25Jun 26Return
Kalaris Therapeutic… (KLRS)10053.9-46.1%
Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR)100315.0+215.0%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)100196.7+96.7%
Arcutis Biotherapeu… (ARQT)100155.9+55.9%
Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS)100303.2+203.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: KLRS vs KYMR vs IMVT vs ARQT vs RCUS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KLRS leads in 2 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Immunovant, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality. ARQT and RCUS also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇KLRS emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
KLRS
Kalaris Therapeutics Inc
The Income Pick

KLRS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 0.81
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.81, Low D/E 1.8%, current ratio 12.23x
  • Beta 0.81, current ratio 12.23x
  • 100.0% revenue growth vs IMVT's -22.2%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
KYMR
Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, KYMR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

IMVT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 237.9% 10Y total return vs KYMR's 159.2%
  • 2.6% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
Best for: long-term compounding
ARQT
Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
The Growth Play

ARQT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 91.3%, EPS growth 88.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 367.3%
  • -0.6% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2%
Best for: growth exposure
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

RCUS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +154.5% vs KLRS's +56.9%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthKLRS logoKLRS100.0% revenue growth vs IMVT's -22.2%
Quality / MarginsIMVT logoIMVT2.6% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
Stability / SafetyKLRS logoKLRSBeta 0.81 vs RCUS's 2.00, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)RCUS logoRCUS+154.5% vs KLRS's +56.9%
Efficiency (ROA)ARQT logoARQT-0.6% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2%

KLRS vs KYMR vs IMVT vs ARQT vs RCUS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

KLRSKalaris Therapeutics Inc

Segment breakdown not available.

KYMRKymera Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ARQTArcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
FY 2023
Other Revenue
51.0%$30M
Product
49.0%$29M
RCUSArcus Biosciences, Inc.
FY 2025
License And Development Services
87.4%$221M
Development Services
6.7%$17M
R&D Services
3.2%$8M
License
2.8%$7M

KLRS vs KYMR vs IMVT vs ARQT vs RCUS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLARQTLAGGINGRCUS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ARQT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

ARQT and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $416M and $0 in trailing revenue. ARQT is the more profitable business, keeping -0.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KYMR's -6.1%. On growth, ARQT holds the edge at +60.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricKLRS logoKLRSKalaris Therapeut…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$51M$0$416M$236M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$46M-$352M-$532M$6M-$391M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$44M-$315M-$506M-$2M-$369M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$49M-$244M-$407M$27M-$489M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+33.2%+90.9%+90.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-7.0%+0.8%-168.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-6.1%-0.6%-156.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-4.7%+6.5%-2.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+55.5%+60.1%-39.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+81.7%+13.4%-14.1%+55.0%+10.5%
ARQT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ARQT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricKLRS logoKLRSKalaris Therapeut…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…
Market CapShares × price$81M$7.0B$6.9B$3.0B$2.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$16M$6.8B$6.0B$3.0B$2.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.52x-23.36x-12.14x-187.54x-7.23x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.122.45x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue179.54x8.11x9.70x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.84x4.61x7.19x16.37x4.05x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
ARQT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ARQT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

ARQT delivers a -1.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-1 in annual profit, vs $-73 for KLRS. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RCUS's 0.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KYMR scores 4/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting mixed financial health.

MetricKLRS logoKLRSKalaris Therapeut…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-72.8%-25.0%-68.2%-1.4%-69.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-43.5%-22.3%-62.2%-0.6%-35.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-24.9%-5.2%-64.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-41.0%-27.2%-68.3%-4.3%-42.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–934240
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.02x0.05x0.00x0.03x0.16x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$97M-$275M-$902M-$37M-$123M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$98M$357M$902M$43M$222M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1M$82M$72,000$6M$99M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-31.98x-2119.53x2.08x-13.38x
ARQT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

IMVT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $31,304 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,748 for KLRS. Over the past 12 months, RCUS leads with a +154.5% total return vs KLRS's +56.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KYMR at 50.8% vs KLRS's -22.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricKLRS logoKLRSKalaris Therapeut…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-47.8%+18.5%+29.8%-15.9%+2.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+56.9%+82.3%+110.9%+80.6%+154.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-52.5%+242.9%+55.0%+138.8%+18.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-52.5%+70.4%+213.0%-16.2%-3.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-52.5%+159.2%+237.9%+11.8%+40.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-22.0%+50.8%+15.7%+33.7%+5.8%
IMVT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — KLRS and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KLRS is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 2.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 92.7% from its 52-week high vs KLRS's 36.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricKLRS logoKLRSKalaris Therapeut…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.81x0.91x1.66x1.45x2.00x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$11.88$103.00$36.27$31.77$28.72
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.14$36.65$14.32$12.72$7.91
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+36.4%+83.7%+92.7%+76.7%+82.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10039.756.857.966.446.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded86K492K1.9M1.5M1.1M
Evenly matched — KLRS and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: KYMR as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", ARQT as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 331.2% upside for KLRS (target: $19) vs 29.9% for IMVT (target: $44).

MetricKLRS logoKLRSKalaris Therapeut…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$18.67$112.60$43.67$34.00$31.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts26231218
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ARQT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IMVT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallArcutis Biotherapeutics, In… (ARQT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

KLRS vs KYMR vs IMVT vs ARQT vs RCUS: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is KLRS or KYMR or IMVT or ARQT or RCUS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.

(ARQT) is the stronger pick with 91. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). Analysts rate Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — KLRS or KYMR or IMVT or ARQT or RCUS?

Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.

(IMVT) delivered a total return of +213. 0%, compared to -52. 5% for Kalaris Therapeutics Inc (KLRS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +237. 9% versus KLRS's -52. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — KLRS or KYMR or IMVT or ARQT or RCUS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kalaris Therapeutics Inc (KLRS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

81β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 2. 00β — meaning RCUS is approximately 146% more volatile than KLRS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 16% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — KLRS or KYMR or IMVT or ARQT or RCUS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.

(ARQT) is pulling ahead at 91. 3% versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 88. 8% year-over-year, compared to -23. 8% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARQT leads at 367. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — KLRS or KYMR or IMVT or ARQT or RCUS?

Kalaris Therapeutics Inc (KLRS) is the more profitable company, earning 0.

0% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KLRS leads at 0. 0% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is KLRS or KYMR or IMVT or ARQT or RCUS more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KLRS: 331.

2% to $18. 67.

07

Which pays a better dividend — KLRS or KYMR or IMVT or ARQT or RCUS?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is KLRS or KYMR or IMVT or ARQT or RCUS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.

(KYMR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 91), +159. 2% 10Y return). Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a higher beta of 2. 00 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KYMR: +159. 2%, RCUS: +40. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between KLRS and KYMR and IMVT and ARQT and RCUS?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: KLRS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARQT is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.