Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
KLRS logo
KLRS
TGTX logo
TGTX
RCUS logo
RCUS
IMVT logo
IMVT
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

KLRS vs TGTX vs RCUS vs IMVT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
KLRS
Kalaris Therapeutics Inc

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$81M
5Y Perf.-46.1%
TGTX
TG Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.58B
5Y Perf.+25.6%
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.40B
5Y Perf.+203.2%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.90B
5Y Perf.+96.7%

KLRS vs TGTX vs RCUS vs IMVT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
KLRS logoKLRS
TGTX logoTGTX
RCUS logoRCUS
IMVT logoIMVT
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$81M$7.58B$2.40B$6.90B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$700M$236M$0.00
Net Income (TTM)$-44M$462M$-369M$-506M
Gross Margin83.0%90.7%
Operating Margin21.3%-168.6%
Forward P/E35.9x
Total Debt$1M$261M$99M$72K
Cash & Equiv.$98M$79M$222M$902M

KLRS vs TGTX vs RCUS vs IMVTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

KLRS
TGTX
RCUS
IMVT
StockMar 25Jun 26Return
Kalaris Therapeutic… (KLRS)10053.9-46.1%
TG Therapeutics, In… (TGTX)100125.6+25.6%
Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS)100303.2+203.2%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)100196.7+96.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: KLRS vs TGTX vs RCUS vs IMVT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TGTX leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Kalaris Therapeutics Inc is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. RCUS also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇TGTX emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
KLRS
Kalaris Therapeutics Inc
The Defensive Pick

KLRS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.81, Low D/E 1.8%, current ratio 12.23x
  • Beta 0.81, current ratio 12.23x
  • 100.0% revenue growth vs IMVT's -22.2%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
TGTX
TG Therapeutics, Inc.
The Income Pick

TGTX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.65
  • Rev growth 87.3%, EPS growth 17.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
  • 6.1% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 237.9%
  • 66.0% margin vs RCUS's -156.4%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

RCUS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +154.5% vs TGTX's +32.5%
Best for: momentum
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Secondary Option

IMVT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthKLRS logoKLRS100.0% revenue growth vs IMVT's -22.2%
Quality / MarginsTGTX logoTGTX66.0% margin vs RCUS's -156.4%
Stability / SafetyTGTX logoTGTXBeta 0.65 vs RCUS's 2.00
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)RCUS logoRCUS+154.5% vs TGTX's +32.5%
Efficiency (ROA)TGTX logoTGTX42.8% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2%

KLRS vs TGTX vs RCUS vs IMVT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

KLRSKalaris Therapeutics Inc

Segment breakdown not available.

TGTXTG Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
98.5%$607M
Royalty
0.9%$6M
Other Revenue
0.6%$4M
License Revenue
0.0%$152,000
RCUSArcus Biosciences, Inc.
FY 2025
License And Development Services
87.4%$221M
Development Services
6.7%$17M
R&D Services
3.2%$8M
License
2.8%$7M
IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

KLRS vs TGTX vs RCUS vs IMVT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTGTXLAGGINGIMVT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TGTX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

TGTX and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $700M and $0 in trailing revenue. TGTX is the more profitable business, keeping 66.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RCUS's -156.4%. On growth, TGTX holds the edge at +69.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricKLRS logoKLRSKalaris Therapeut…TGTX logoTGTXTG Therapeutics, …RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$700M$236M$0
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$46M$150M-$391M-$532M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$44M$462M-$369M-$506M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$49M-$14M-$489M-$407M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+83.0%+90.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+21.3%-168.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+66.0%-156.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.0%-2.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+69.6%-39.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+81.7%+2.9%+10.5%-14.1%
TGTX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — KLRS and RCUS and IMVT each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricKLRS logoKLRSKalaris Therapeut…TGTX logoTGTXTG Therapeutics, …RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$81M$7.6B$2.4B$6.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$16M$7.8B$2.3B$6.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.52x17.88x-7.23x-12.14x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.35.88x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple62.82x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue12.30x9.70x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.84x12.33x4.05x7.19x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
Evenly matched — KLRS and RCUS and IMVT each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TGTX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

TGTX delivers a 87.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $87 in annual profit, vs $-73 for KLRS. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TGTX's 0.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TGTX scores 4/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting mixed financial health.

MetricKLRS logoKLRSKalaris Therapeut…TGTX logoTGTXTG Therapeutics, …RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-72.8%+87.4%-69.0%-68.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-43.5%+42.8%-35.3%-62.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+16.4%-64.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-41.0%+17.7%-42.1%-68.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93402
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.02x0.40x0.16x0.00x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$97M$182M-$123M-$902M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$98M$79M$222M$902M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1M$261M$99M$72,000
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-31.98x5.67x-13.38x
TGTX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TGTX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $31,304 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,748 for KLRS. Over the past 12 months, RCUS leads with a +154.5% total return vs TGTX's +32.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TGTX at 23.6% vs KLRS's -22.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricKLRS logoKLRSKalaris Therapeut…TGTX logoTGTXTG Therapeutics, …RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-47.8%+69.1%+2.2%+29.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+56.9%+32.5%+154.5%+110.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-52.5%+89.0%+18.3%+55.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-52.5%+29.3%-3.1%+213.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-52.5%+605.4%+40.0%+237.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-22.0%+23.6%+5.8%+15.7%
TGTX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

TGTX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

TGTX is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 2.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TGTX currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs KLRS's 36.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricKLRS logoKLRSKalaris Therapeut…TGTX logoTGTXTG Therapeutics, …RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.81x0.65x2.00x1.66x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$11.88$50.41$28.72$36.27
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.14$25.28$7.91$14.32
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+36.4%+98.2%+82.9%+92.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10039.776.146.557.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded86K2.0M1.1M1.9M
TGTX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: TGTX as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 331.2% upside for KLRS (target: $19) vs 10.1% for TGTX (target: $55).

MetricKLRS logoKLRSKalaris Therapeut…TGTX logoTGTXTG Therapeutics, …RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$18.67$54.50$31.00$43.67
# AnalystsCovering analysts131823
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.2%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

TGTX leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.

Best OverallTG Therapeutics, Inc. (TGTX)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

KLRS vs TGTX vs RCUS vs IMVT: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is KLRS or TGTX or RCUS or IMVT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, TG Therapeutics, Inc.

(TGTX) is the stronger pick with 87. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). TG Therapeutics, Inc. (TGTX) offers the better valuation at 17. 9x trailing P/E (35. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TG Therapeutics, Inc. (TGTX) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — KLRS or TGTX or RCUS or IMVT?

Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.

(IMVT) delivered a total return of +213. 0%, compared to -52. 5% for Kalaris Therapeutics Inc (KLRS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TGTX returned +605. 4% versus KLRS's -52. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — KLRS or TGTX or RCUS or IMVT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TG Therapeutics, Inc.

(TGTX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 2. 00β — meaning RCUS is approximately 207% more volatile than TGTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 40% for TG Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — KLRS or TGTX or RCUS or IMVT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TG Therapeutics, Inc.

(TGTX) is pulling ahead at 87. 3% versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TG Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 1747% year-over-year, compared to -4. 8% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TGTX leads at 504. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — KLRS or TGTX or RCUS or IMVT?

TG Therapeutics, Inc.

(TGTX) is the more profitable company, earning 72. 6% net margin versus -142. 9% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 72. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TGTX leads at 20. 0% versus -156. 3% for RCUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCUS leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is KLRS or TGTX or RCUS or IMVT more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KLRS: 331.

2% to $18. 67.

07

Which pays a better dividend — KLRS or TGTX or RCUS or IMVT?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is KLRS or TGTX or RCUS or IMVT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, TG Therapeutics, Inc.

(TGTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), +605. 4% 10Y return). Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a higher beta of 2. 00 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TGTX: +605. 4%, RCUS: +40. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between KLRS and TGTX and RCUS and IMVT?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: KLRS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TGTX is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.