Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
KLTO vs ATHA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
KLTO vs ATHA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $7M | $17M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $-129M |
| Total Debt | $272K | $803K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $64K | $69M |
KLTO vs ATHA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 24 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Klotho Neuroscience… (KLTO) | 100 | 40.9 | -59.1% |
| Athira Pharma, Inc. (ATHA) | 100 | 15.4 | -84.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KLTO vs ATHA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KLTO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -63.0% 10Y total return vs ATHA's -97.5%
- -112.1% ROA vs ATHA's -225.7%
ATHA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.37
- EPS growth 2.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 2.9%, current ratio 1.88x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -64.6% revenue growth vs KLTO's -49.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.37 vs KLTO's 1.91, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.0% vs KLTO's -81.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -112.1% ROA vs ATHA's -225.7% |
KLTO vs ATHA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KLTO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KLTO and ATHA operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | -$110M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | -$129M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | -$52M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +72.9% | +24.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — KLTO and ATHA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $17M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8M | -$30M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.19x | -0.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.19x | 0.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KLTO leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KLTO delivers a -113.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-114 in annual profit, vs $-4 for ATHA. ATHA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KLTO's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KLTO scores 4/9 vs ATHA's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -113.7% | -3.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -112.1% | -2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.4% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.2% | -2.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $208,012 | -$68M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $63,741 | $69M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $271,753 | $803,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.98x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KLTO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KLTO five years ago would be worth $3,699 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $224 for ATHA. Over the past 12 months, ATHA leads with a +40.0% total return vs KLTO's -81.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KLTO at -28.2% vs ATHA's -48.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.1% | -37.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -81.0% | +40.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.0% | -86.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.0% | -97.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.0% | -97.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -28.2% | -48.9% |
Risk & Volatility
ATHA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATHA is the less volatile stock with a 1.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KLTO's 1.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ATHA currently trades 51.9% from its 52-week high vs KLTO's 15.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.91x | 1.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.45 | $8.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.21 | $2.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +15.6% | +51.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.9 | 38.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 95K | 46K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | 0.0% |
KLTO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ATHA leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
KLTO vs ATHA: Frequently Asked Questions
6 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — KLTO or ATHA?
Over the past 5 years, Klotho Neurosciences, Inc.
(KLTO) delivered a total return of -63. 0%, compared to -97. 8% for Athira Pharma, Inc. (ATHA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KLTO returned -63. 0% versus ATHA's -97. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — KLTO or ATHA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Athira Pharma, Inc.
(ATHA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 37β versus Klotho Neurosciences, Inc. 's 1. 91β — meaning KLTO is approximately 40% more volatile than ATHA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Athira Pharma, Inc. (ATHA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 23% for Klotho Neurosciences, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
03Which has better profit margins — KLTO or ATHA?
Klotho Neurosciences, Inc.
(KLTO) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Athira Pharma, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KLTO leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for ATHA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KLTO leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
04Which pays a better dividend — KLTO or ATHA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
05Is KLTO or ATHA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Athira Pharma, Inc.
(ATHA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Klotho Neurosciences, Inc. (KLTO) carries a higher beta of 1. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ATHA: -97. 5%, KLTO: -63. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
06What are the main differences between KLTO and ATHA?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.