Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
KZR vs TGTX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
KZR vs TGTX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $54M | $7.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $700M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-45M | $462M |
| Gross Margin | — | 83.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 21.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 35.9x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $261M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $72M | $79M |
KZR vs TGTX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kezar Life Sciences… (KZR) | 100 | 1.4 | -98.6% |
| TG Therapeutics, In… (TGTX) | 100 | 173.4 | +73.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KZR vs TGTX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KZR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 3.3%, current ratio 11.52x
- +52.2% vs TGTX's +32.5%
TGTX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.65
- Rev growth 87.3%, EPS growth 17.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- 6.1% 10Y total return vs KZR's -99.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 87.3% revenue growth vs KZR's 42.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 66.0% margin vs KZR's 5.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs KZR's 0.72 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.2% vs TGTX's +32.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 42.8% ROA vs KZR's -51.5%, ROIC 16.4% vs -85.3% |
KZR vs TGTX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KZR vs TGTX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGTX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGTX and KZR operate at a comparable scale, with $700M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $700M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$41M | $150M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$45M | $462M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$42M | -$14M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +83.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +21.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +66.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -2.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +69.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +65.6% | +2.9% |
Valuation Metrics
KZR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $54M | $7.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$16M | $7.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.95x | 17.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 35.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 62.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 12.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.76x | 12.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TGTX leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TGTX delivers a 87.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $87 in annual profit, vs $-58 for KZR. KZR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TGTX's 0.40x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -58.4% | +87.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -51.5% | +42.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -85.3% | +16.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -53.8% | +17.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.40x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$70M | $182M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $72M | $79M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $261M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -38.59x | 5.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TGTX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TGTX five years ago would be worth $12,929 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $126 for KZR. Over the past 12 months, KZR leads with a +52.2% total return vs TGTX's +32.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TGTX at 23.6% vs KZR's -69.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.9% | +69.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +52.2% | +32.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.0% | +89.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | +29.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +605.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -69.0% | +23.6% |
Risk & Volatility
TGTX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TGTX is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KZR's 0.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.55 | $50.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.53 | $25.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.6% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.4 | 76.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 111K | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates KZR as "Hold" and TGTX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.1% upside for TGTX (target: $55) vs -17.7% for KZR (target: $6).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.00 | $54.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% |
TGTX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KZR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
KZR vs TGTX: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KZR or TGTX a better buy right now?
TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) offers the better valuation at 17. 9x trailing P/E (35. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TG Therapeutics, Inc. (TGTX) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — KZR or TGTX?
Over the past 5 years, TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) delivered a total return of +29. 3%, compared to -98. 7% for Kezar Life Sciences, Inc. (KZR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TGTX returned +605. 4% versus KZR's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — KZR or TGTX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus Kezar Life Sciences, Inc. 's 0. 72β — meaning KZR is approximately 10% more volatile than TGTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kezar Life Sciences, Inc. (KZR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 40% for TG Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — KZR or TGTX?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TG Therapeutics, Inc.
grew EPS 1747% year-over-year, compared to -566. 1% for Kezar Life Sciences, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — KZR or TGTX?
TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) is the more profitable company, earning 72. 6% net margin versus 0. 0% for Kezar Life Sciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 72. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TGTX leads at 20. 0% versus 0. 0% for KZR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TGTX leads at 83. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is KZR or TGTX more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TGTX: 10.
1% to $54. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — KZR or TGTX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is KZR or TGTX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), +605. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TGTX: +605. 4%, KZR: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between KZR and TGTX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KZR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TGTX is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.