Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
LSBK vs KRNY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
LSBK vs KRNY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $137M | $533M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $40M | $344M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $32M |
| Gross Margin | 70.9% | 47.7% |
| Operating Margin | 22.1% | 11.6% |
| Forward P/E | 18.1x | 13.6x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $1.26B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $64M | $167M |
LSBK vs KRNY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lake Shore Bancorp,… (LSBK) | 100 | 192.3 | +92.3% |
| Kearny Financial Co… (KRNY) | 100 | 103.5 | +3.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LSBK vs KRNY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LSBK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 0.8%
- 111.6% 10Y total return vs KRNY's -7.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 0.9%, current ratio 200.88x
KRNY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.1%, EPS growth 130.2%
- 5.1% NII/revenue growth vs LSBK's 3.8%
- Lower P/E (13.6x vs 18.1x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.1% NII/revenue growth vs LSBK's 3.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.6x vs 18.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs LSBK's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs KRNY's 0.67, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.2% yield, vs LSBK's 0.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.1% vs KRNY's +47.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs LSBK's 0.5% |
LSBK vs KRNY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LSBK vs KRNY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LSBK leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KRNY is the larger business by revenue, generating $344M annually — 8.7x LSBK's $40M. LSBK is the more profitable business, keeping 18.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KRNY's 9.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $40M | $344M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9M | $43M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $32M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | $40M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.9% | +47.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.1% | +11.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +9.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.8% | +11.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.8% | +50.0% |
Valuation Metrics
LSBK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.1x trailing earnings, LSBK trades at a 10% valuation discount to KRNY's 20.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LSBK's 8.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KRNY's 45.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $137M | $533M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $74M | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.13x | 20.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.55x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.59x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.02x | 45.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.46x | 1.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.91x | 0.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.40x | 24.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LSBK leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LSBK delivers a 6.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $4 for KRNY. LSBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KRNY's 1.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LSBK scores 8/9 vs KRNY's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.3% | +4.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.4% | +1.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 1.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$63M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $64M | $167M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.75x | 0.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LSBK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LSBK five years ago would be worth $16,711 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,943 for KRNY. Over the past 12 months, LSBK leads with a +53.1% total return vs KRNY's +47.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LSBK at 30.7% vs KRNY's 9.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.7% | +18.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +53.1% | +47.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +123.3% | +32.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.1% | -10.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +111.6% | -7.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.7% | +9.9% |
Risk & Volatility
LSBK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LSBK is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KRNY's 0.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LSBK currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs KRNY's 95.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.27x | 0.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.40 | $8.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.63 | $5.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +95.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.1 | 52.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9K | 318K |
Analyst Outlook
KRNY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, KRNY offers the higher dividend yield at 5.20% vs LSBK's 0.79%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $9.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +5.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.14 | $0.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.1% |
LSBK leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). KRNY leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook).
LSBK vs KRNY: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LSBK or KRNY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kearny Financial Corp.
(KRNY) is the stronger pick with 5. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 8% for Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. (LSBK). Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. (LSBK) offers the better valuation at 18. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY) a "Hold" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LSBK or KRNY?
On trailing P/E, Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc.
(LSBK) is the cheapest at 18. 1x versus Kearny Financial Corp. at 20. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LSBK or KRNY?
Over the past 5 years, Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc.
(LSBK) delivered a total return of +67. 1%, compared to -10. 6% for Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LSBK returned +111. 6% versus KRNY's -7. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LSBK or KRNY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc.
(LSBK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus Kearny Financial Corp. 's 0. 67β — meaning KRNY is approximately 149% more volatile than LSBK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. (LSBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 168% for Kearny Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LSBK or KRNY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kearny Financial Corp.
(KRNY) is pulling ahead at 5. 1% versus 3. 8% for Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. (LSBK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kearny Financial Corp. grew EPS 130. 2% year-over-year, compared to 47. 7% for Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LSBK or KRNY?
Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc.
(LSBK) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 4% net margin versus 7. 6% for Kearny Financial Corp. — meaning it keeps 18. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LSBK leads at 22. 1% versus 9. 0% for KRNY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LSBK leads at 70. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — LSBK or KRNY?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY) offers the highest yield at 5. 2%, versus 0. 8% for Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. (LSBK).
08Is LSBK or KRNY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc.
(LSBK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 27), 0. 8% yield, +111. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LSBK: +111. 6%, KRNY: -7. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between LSBK and KRNY?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LSBK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KRNY is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.