Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
MAMA logo
MAMA
BRBS logo
BRBS
JPM logo
JPM
FIS logo
FIS
BAC logo
BAC
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MAMA vs BRBS vs JPM vs FIS vs BAC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MAMA
Mama's Creations, Inc.

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$607M
5Y Perf.+436.3%
BRBS
Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesAMEX • US
Market Cap$302M
5Y Perf.-80.7%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+111.3%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.26B
5Y Perf.-73.7%
BAC
Bank of America Corporation

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$422.78B
5Y Perf.+46.0%

MAMA vs BRBS vs JPM vs FIS vs BAC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MAMA logoMAMA
BRBS logoBRBS
JPM logoJPM
FIS logoFIS
BAC logoBAC
IndustryPackaged FoodsBanks - RegionalBanks - DiversifiedInformation Technology ServicesBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$607M$302M$896.00B$20.26B$422.78B
Revenue (TTM)$189M$151M$280.33B$11.66B$191.57B
Net Income (TTM)$6M$11M$57.05B$2.67B$30.51B
Gross Margin24.5%63.5%60.0%37.6%56.1%
Operating Margin4.3%9.1%25.9%17.9%19.7%
Forward P/E139.7x30.0x14.4x6.2x12.6x
Total Debt$14M$179M$942.38B$4.01B$365.90B
Cash & Equiv.$20M$116M$343.34B$599M$231.84B

MAMA vs BRBS vs JPM vs FIS vs BACLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MAMA
BRBS
JPM
FIS
BAC
StockJul 21Jun 26Return
Mama's Creations, I… (MAMA)100536.3+436.3%
Blue Ridge Bankshar… (BRBS)10019.3-80.7%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100211.3+111.3%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10026.3-73.7%
Bank of America Cor… (BAC)100146.0+46.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MAMA vs BRBS vs JPM vs FIS vs BAC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MAMA leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. FIS also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇MAMA emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
MAMA
Mama's Creations, Inc.
The Growth Play

MAMA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 39.2%, EPS growth 38.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.6%
  • 5.2% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 27.5%, current ratio 2.17x
  • 39.2% revenue growth vs BRBS's -13.4%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
BRBS
Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BRBS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and bank quality is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.48, yield 6.5%
  • NIM 3.2% vs BAC's 1.8%
  • Beta 0.48 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
  • 6.5% yield, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and bank quality
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Financial Play

JPM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Value Pick

FIS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency and defensive.

  • PEG 0.26 vs BAC's 0.82
  • Beta 0.61, yield 4.2%, current ratio 0.59x
  • Lower P/E (6.2x vs 12.6x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.82
  • 22.9% margin vs MAMA's 3.2%
Best for: valuation efficiency and defensive
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
The Financial Play

Among these 5 stocks, BAC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: financial services exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMAMA logoMAMA39.2% revenue growth vs BRBS's -13.4%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (6.2x vs 12.6x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.82
Quality / MarginsFIS logoFIS22.9% margin vs MAMA's 3.2%
Stability / SafetyBRBS logoBRBSBeta 0.48 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
DividendsBRBS logoBRBS6.5% yield, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)MAMA logoMAMA+87.3% vs FIS's -49.4%
Efficiency (ROA)MAMA logoMAMA7.9% ROA vs BRBS's 0.4%, ROIC 16.8% vs 2.0%

MAMA vs BRBS vs JPM vs FIS vs BAC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
MAMAMama's Creations, Inc.
FY 2026
Reportable Segment
100.0%$172M
BRBSBlue Ridge Bankshares, Inc.
FY 2020
Bank And Purchase Card Revenue
100.0%$1M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B
BACBank of America Corporation
FY 2024
Loans and Leases
32.2%$62.0B
other interest income
14.7%$28.3B
Debt securities
13.5%$26.0B
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell
10.3%$19.9B
Investment And Brokerage Services
9.2%$17.8B
Market making and similar activities
6.7%$13.0B
Trading account assets
5.4%$10.4B
Other (4)
7.8%$15.1B

MAMA vs BRBS vs JPM vs FIS vs BAC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMAMALAGGINGBAC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — JPM and FIS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 1861.3x BRBS's $151M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MAMA's 3.2%. On growth, MAMA holds the edge at +49.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMAMA logoMAMAMama's Creations,…BRBS logoBRBSBlue Ridge Banksh…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…BAC logoBACBank of America C…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$189M$151M$280.3B$11.7B$191.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$14M$15M$81.4B$4.1B$40.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$6M$11M$57.0B$2.7B$30.5B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$9M$9M$100.9B$2.8B$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+24.5%+63.5%+60.0%+37.6%+56.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+4.3%+9.1%+25.9%+17.9%+19.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+3.2%+7.1%+20.4%+22.9%+15.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+4.8%+6.1%+36.0%+23.9%+6.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+49.7%+30.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+51.3%+2.6%+16.0%+30.6%+18.3%
Evenly matched — JPM and FIS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 14.7x trailing earnings, BAC trades at a 87% valuation discount to MAMA's 114.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs MAMA's 71.07x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricMAMA logoMAMAMama's Creations,…BRBS logoBRBSBlue Ridge Banksh…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…BAC logoBACBank of America C…
Market CapShares × price$607M$302M$896.0B$20.3B$422.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$601M$365M$1.50T$23.7B$556.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS114.69x30.00x16.00x52.27x14.66x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.139.74x14.40x6.24x12.56x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate71.07x0.90x2.14x0.95x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple40.90x24.32x18.36x6.50x13.92x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.53x2.00x3.20x1.90x2.21x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share11.73x1.08x2.47x1.46x1.39x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF62.14x80.64x8.88x7.21x33.52x
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MAMA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $3 for BRBS. MAMA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BAC scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMAMA logoMAMAMama's Creations,…BRBS logoBRBSBlue Ridge Banksh…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…BAC logoBACBank of America C…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+13.0%+3.1%+15.9%+18.4%+10.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+7.9%+0.4%+1.3%+7.5%+0.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+16.8%+2.0%+4.5%+6.0%+3.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+17.7%+0.5%+8.9%+6.6%+4.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965567
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.27x0.55x2.60x0.29x1.21x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$5M$63M$599.0B$3.4B$134.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$20M$116M$343.3B$599M$231.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$14M$179M$942.4B$4.0B$365.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense16.57x0.23x0.74x21.16x0.48x
MAMA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MAMA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MAMA five years ago would be worth $61,867 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,958 for BRBS. Over the past 12 months, MAMA leads with a +87.3% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MAMA at 76.8% vs BRBS's -23.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMAMA logoMAMAMama's Creations,…BRBS logoBRBSBlue Ridge Banksh…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…BAC logoBACBank of America C…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+15.3%-9.1%-0.5%-38.9%+1.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+87.3%+21.0%+21.8%-49.4%+28.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+452.2%-54.7%+138.2%-18.9%+103.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+518.7%-70.4%+118.2%-67.3%+47.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+518.7%-15.5%+465.8%-25.6%+368.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+76.8%-23.2%+33.6%-6.8%+26.6%
MAMA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BRBS and BAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BRBS is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BAC currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMAMA logoMAMAMama's Creations,…BRBS logoBRBSBlue Ridge Banksh…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…BAC logoBACBank of America C…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.74x0.48x0.94x0.61x0.86x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.85$4.79$337.25$82.74$57.55
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.75$3.23$262.71$37.91$43.66
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+83.5%+68.9%+95.1%+47.4%+97.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10052.645.759.130.868.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded427K335K7.0M5.6M31.7M
Evenly matched — BRBS and BAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — BRBS and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MAMA as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", BAC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, BRBS offers the higher dividend yield at 6.45% vs JPM's 1.86%.

MetricMAMA logoMAMAMama's Creations,…BRBS logoBRBSBlue Ridge Banksh…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…BAC logoBACBank of America C…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$23.00$339.75$62.88$61.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts7613754
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+6.5%+1.9%+4.2%+2.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0015112
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.21$5.95$1.63$1.27
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.1%+3.9%+7.0%+5.1%
Evenly matched — BRBS and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MAMA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). FIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallMama's Creations, Inc. (MAMA)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MAMA vs BRBS vs JPM vs FIS vs BAC: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MAMA or BRBS or JPM or FIS or BAC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Mama's Creations, Inc.

(MAMA) is the stronger pick with 39. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 4% for Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (BRBS). Bank of America Corporation (BAC) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (12. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mama's Creations, Inc. (MAMA) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MAMA or BRBS or JPM or FIS or BAC?

On trailing P/E, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the cheapest at 14.

7x versus Mama's Creations, Inc. at 114. 7x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus Mama's Creations, Inc. 's 86. 59x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MAMA or BRBS or JPM or FIS or BAC?

Over the past 5 years, Mama's Creations, Inc.

(MAMA) delivered a total return of +518. 7%, compared to -70. 4% for Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (BRBS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MAMA returned +518. 7% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MAMA or BRBS or JPM or FIS or BAC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc.

(BRBS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 48β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 97% more volatile than BRBS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mama's Creations, Inc. (MAMA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 27% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MAMA or BRBS or JPM or FIS or BAC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mama's Creations, Inc.

(MAMA) is pulling ahead at 39. 2% versus -13. 4% for Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (BRBS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 135. 5% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MAMA leads at 22. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MAMA or BRBS or JPM or FIS or BAC?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 3. 1% for Mama's Creations, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 4. 9% for MAMA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BRBS leads at 63. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MAMA or BRBS or JPM or FIS or BAC more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus Mama's Creations, Inc. 's 86. 59x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 139. 7x for Mama's Creations, Inc. — 133. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MAMA or BRBS or JPM or FIS or BAC?

In this comparison, BRBS (6.

5% yield), FIS (4. 2% yield), BAC (2. 3% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. MAMA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MAMA or BRBS or JPM or FIS or BAC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc.

(BRBS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 48), 6. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BRBS: -15. 5%, MAMA: +518. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MAMA and BRBS and JPM and FIS and BAC?

These companies operate in different sectors (MAMA (Consumer Defensive) and BRBS (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and BAC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MAMA is a small-cap high-growth stock; BRBS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; BAC is a large-cap deep-value stock. BRBS, JPM, FIS, BAC pay a dividend while MAMA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.