REIT - Diversified
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MKZR vs HRZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
MKZR vs HRZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Diversified | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $5M | $194M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15M | $40M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-17M | $28M |
| Gross Margin | -35.4% | 18.0% |
| Operating Margin | -89.3% | -4.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.5x |
| Total Debt | $135M | $473M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $106M |
MKZR vs HRZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MacKenzie Realty Ca… (MKZR) | 100 | 8.1 | -91.9% |
| Horizon Technology … (HRZN) | 100 | 37.7 | -62.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MKZR vs HRZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MKZR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.32, yield 100.0%
- Rev growth 40.2%, EPS growth -86.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.32, current ratio 1.17x
HRZN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 41.7% 10Y total return vs MKZR's -45.3%
- -6.6% margin vs MKZR's -118.3%
- -26.0% vs MKZR's -74.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.2% FFO/revenue growth vs HRZN's 17.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | -6.6% margin vs MKZR's -118.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs HRZN's 0.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, vs HRZN's 28.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -26.0% vs MKZR's -74.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.6% ROA vs MKZR's -7.3%, ROIC -0.2% vs -1.9% |
MKZR vs HRZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HRZN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HRZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $40M annually — 2.7x MKZR's $15M. HRZN is the more profitable business, keeping -6.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MKZR's -118.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15M | $40M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $19M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$17M | $28M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $67M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -35.4% | +18.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -89.3% | -4.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -118.3% | -6.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -29.7% | +141.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +79.1% | -29.6% |
Valuation Metrics
MKZR leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5M | $194M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $137M | $561M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.13x | 4.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.55x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.18x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.84x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.24x | 4.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.04x | 0.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 3.42x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HRZN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HRZN delivers a 9.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-20 for MKZR. MKZR carries lower financial leverage with a 1.45x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HRZN's 1.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HRZN scores 5/9 vs MKZR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -19.7% | +9.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.3% | +3.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.9% | -0.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.4% | -0.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.45x | 1.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $132M | $368M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $106M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $135M | $473M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.81x | 0.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HRZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HRZN five years ago would be worth $6,523 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,469 for MKZR. Over the past 12 months, HRZN leads with a -26.0% total return vs MKZR's -74.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HRZN at -14.5% vs MKZR's -18.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -46.1% | -27.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -74.3% | -26.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.3% | -37.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.3% | -34.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.3% | +41.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.2% | -14.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MKZR and HRZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MKZR is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HRZN's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HRZN currently trades 51.9% from its 52-week high vs MKZR's 14.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.32x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.90 | $8.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.24 | $3.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +14.0% | +51.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.2 | 49.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 19K | 863K |
Analyst Outlook
MKZR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, MKZR offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs HRZN's 28.56%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $4.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +28.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.28 | $1.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% |
HRZN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MKZR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
MKZR vs HRZN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MKZR or HRZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc.
(MKZR) is the stronger pick with 40. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 17. 9% for Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN). Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) offers the better valuation at 4. 2x trailing P/E (6. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) a "Hold" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MKZR or HRZN?
Over the past 5 years, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) delivered a total return of -34.
8%, compared to -45. 3% for MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. (MKZR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HRZN returned +41. 7% versus MKZR's -45. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MKZR or HRZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc.
(MKZR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 32β versus Horizon Technology Finance Corporation's 0. 87β — meaning HRZN is approximately 177% more volatile than MKZR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. (MKZR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 145% versus 149% for Horizon Technology Finance Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MKZR or HRZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc.
(MKZR) is pulling ahead at 40. 2% versus 17. 9% for Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Horizon Technology Finance Corporation grew EPS 756. 3% year-over-year, compared to -86. 6% for MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MKZR or HRZN?
Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) is the more profitable company, earning -6.
6% net margin versus -117. 5% for MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. — meaning it keeps -6. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HRZN leads at -4. 0% versus -24. 6% for MKZR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MKZR leads at 50. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MKZR or HRZN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. (MKZR) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 28. 6% for Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN).
07Is MKZR or HRZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc.
(MKZR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 32), 100. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MKZR: -45. 3%, HRZN: +41. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MKZR and HRZN?
These companies operate in different sectors (MKZR (Real Estate) and HRZN (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Financial Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 8%
- Dividend Yield > 11.4%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.