MKZR vs TPVG

For growth investors, MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc.

(MKZR) is the stronger pick with 40. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 36. 6% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 5x trailing P/E (5. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) a "Hold" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) delivered a total return of -20. 0%, compared to -45. 3% for MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. (MKZR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TPVG returned +80. 9% versus MKZR's -45. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc.

(MKZR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 32β versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 0. 67β — meaning TPVG is approximately 114% more volatile than MKZR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 133% versus 145% for MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc.

(MKZR) is pulling ahead at 40. 2% versus 36. 6% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. grew EPS 48. 8% year-over-year, compared to -86. 6% for MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus -117. 5% for MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus -24. 6% for MKZR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TPVG leads at 83. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. (MKZR) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 18. 6% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG).

For long-horizon retirement investors, MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc.

(MKZR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 32), 100. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MKZR: -45. 3%, TPVG: +80. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (MKZR (Real Estate) and TPVG (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.