REIT - Diversified
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MKZR vs WELL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
MKZR vs WELL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Healthcare Facilities |
| Market Cap | $5M | $143.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15M | $11.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-17M | $1.43B |
| Gross Margin | -35.4% | 39.1% |
| Operating Margin | -89.3% | 4.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 71.5x |
| Total Debt | $135M | $21.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $5.03B |
MKZR vs WELL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MacKenzie Realty Ca… (MKZR) | 100 | 8.1 | -91.9% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 184.6 | +84.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MKZR vs WELL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MKZR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 40.2%, EPS growth -86.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.6%
- 40.2% FFO/revenue growth vs WELL's 35.8%
- 100.0% yield, vs WELL's 1.3%
WELL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.15, yield 1.3%
- 240.1% 10Y total return vs MKZR's -45.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.15, Low D/E 49.5%, current ratio 5.34x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.2% FFO/revenue growth vs WELL's 35.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.3% margin vs MKZR's -118.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.15 vs MKZR's 0.32, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, vs WELL's 1.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.1% vs MKZR's -74.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.3% ROA vs MKZR's -7.3%, ROIC 0.5% vs -1.9% |
MKZR vs WELL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MKZR vs WELL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 786.8x MKZR's $15M. WELL is the more profitable business, keeping 12.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MKZR's -118.3%. On growth, WELL holds the edge at +40.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15M | $11.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $2.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$17M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -35.4% | +39.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -89.3% | +4.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -118.3% | +12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -29.7% | +21.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.8% | +40.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +79.1% | +22.5% |
Valuation Metrics
MKZR leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MKZR's 22.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WELL's 64.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5M | $143.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $137M | $160.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.13x | 147.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 71.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.84x | 64.24x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.24x | 13.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.04x | 3.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 50.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WELL leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WELL delivers a 3.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-20 for MKZR. WELL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKZR's 1.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs MKZR's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -19.7% | +3.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.3% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.9% | +0.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.4% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.45x | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $132M | $16.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $5.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $135M | $21.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.81x | 0.26x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $28,460 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,469 for MKZR. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +36.1% total return vs MKZR's -74.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 42.9% vs MKZR's -18.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -46.1% | +10.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -74.3% | +36.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.3% | +191.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.3% | +184.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.3% | +240.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.2% | +42.9% |
Risk & Volatility
WELL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WELL is the less volatile stock with a 0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MKZR's 0.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WELL currently trades 92.6% from its 52-week high vs MKZR's 14.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.32x | 0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.90 | $221.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.24 | $148.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +14.0% | +92.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.2 | 44.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 19K | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MKZR and WELL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, MKZR offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs WELL's 1.35%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $239.11 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.28 | $2.76 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% |
WELL leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MKZR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
MKZR vs WELL: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MKZR or WELL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc.
(MKZR) is the stronger pick with 40. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 35. 8% for Welltower Inc. (WELL). Welltower Inc. (WELL) offers the better valuation at 147. 7x trailing P/E (71. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Welltower Inc. (WELL) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MKZR or WELL?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +184. 6%, compared to -45. 3% for MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. (MKZR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +240. 1% versus MKZR's -45. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MKZR or WELL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 15β versus MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. 's 0. 32β — meaning MKZR is approximately 104% more volatile than WELL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Welltower Inc. (WELL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 145% for MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MKZR or WELL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc.
(MKZR) is pulling ahead at 40. 2% versus 35. 8% for Welltower Inc. (WELL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Welltower Inc. grew EPS -11. 5% year-over-year, compared to -86. 6% for MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MKZR leads at 28. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MKZR or WELL?
Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 8% net margin versus -117. 5% for MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WELL leads at 3. 3% versus -24. 6% for MKZR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MKZR leads at 50. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MKZR or WELL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. (MKZR) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 1. 3% for Welltower Inc. (WELL).
07Is MKZR or WELL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 15), 1. 3% yield, +240. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WELL: +240. 1%, MKZR: -45. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MKZR and WELL?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.