Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) vs Apple Inc. (AAPL) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MNR | 27.2% revenue growth vs AAPL's 6.4% |
| Value | MNR | Lower P/E (12.9x vs 31.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | MNR | 28.5% net margin vs AAPL's 27.0% |
| Stability / Safety | MNR | Beta 0.68 vs AAPL's 1.28, lower leverage |
| Dividends | MNR | 24.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs AAPL's 0.4% |
| Momentum (1Y) | AAPL | +9.7% vs MNR's +0.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AAPL | 31.1% ROA vs MNR's 7.7%, ROIC 64.5% vs 11.7% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Mach Natural Resources is an independent oil and gas company that acquires, develops, and produces oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids reserves in the Anadarko Basin region. It makes money primarily from the sale of produced hydrocarbons — oil, natural gas, and NGLs — with revenue mix depending on commodity prices and production volumes. The company's competitive advantage lies in its strategic focus on the prolific Anadarko Basin and its operational expertise in developing these specific assets.
Apple is a technology giant that designs and sells premium consumer electronics — most famously the iPhone — along with related software and services. It generates revenue primarily from hardware sales (roughly 80% of total) and a fast-growing services segment (around 20%) that includes the App Store, subscriptions, and licensing. Its key competitive advantage is a powerful ecosystem that locks users into its hardware, software, and services through seamless integration and high switching costs.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
AAPL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). MNR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
AAPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $435.6B annually — 425.9x MNR's $1.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 28.5% (MNR) to 27.0% (AAPL). On growth, AAPL holds the edge at +15.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | MNRMach Natural Reso… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $435.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $559M | $152.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $292M | $117.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $220M | $123.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.2% | +47.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.8% | +32.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +28.5% | +27.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.5% | +28.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | +15.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -140.0% | +18.3% |
Valuation Metrics
At 6.9x trailing earnings, MNR trades at a 81% valuation discount to AAPL's 35.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MNR's 5.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AAPL's 27.5x.
| Metric | MNRMach Natural Reso… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $3.88T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.9B | $3.97T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.85x | 35.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.91x | 31.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.98x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.08x | 27.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.26x | 9.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.06x | 53.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.69x | 39.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL delivers a 133.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $134 in annual profit, vs $15 for MNR. MNR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.64x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAPL's 1.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 7/9 vs MNR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | MNRMach Natural Reso… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.8% | +133.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.7% | +31.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.7% | +64.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.5% | +69.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.64x | 1.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $660M | $89.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $106M | $33.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $766M | $123.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.60x | — |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in AAPL five years ago would be worth $21,049 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,191 for MNR. Over the past 12 months, AAPL leads with a +9.7% total return vs MNR's +0.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AAPL at 21.9% vs MNR's 0.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MNRMach Natural Reso… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.4% | -2.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.9% | +9.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.9% | +81.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.9% | +110.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.9% | +1027.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.6% | +21.9% |
Risk & Volatility
MNR is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AAPL's 1.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAPL currently trades 91.5% from its 52-week high vs MNR's 81.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | MNRMach Natural Reso… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.68x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.91 | $288.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.46 | $169.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.8% | +91.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.4 | 57.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 295K | 40.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MNR as "Buy" and AAPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.9% upside for MNR (target: $19) vs 14.7% for AAPL (target: $303). For income investors, MNR offers the higher dividend yield at 24.36% vs AAPL's 0.39%.
| Metric | MNRMach Natural Reso… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.00 | $303.11 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 109 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +24.4% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.17 | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.3% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Oct 23 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mach Natural Resour… (MNR) | 100 | 63.36 | -36.6% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 100 | 155.2 | +55.2% |
Apple Inc. (AAPL) returned +110% over 5 years vs Mach Natural Resour… (MNR)'s +2%. A $10,000 investment in AAPL 5 years ago would be worth $21,049 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mach Natural Resour… (MNR) | $392M | $970M | +147.0% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | $215.6B | $416.2B | +93.0% |
Apple Inc.'s revenue grew from $215.6B (2016) to $416.2B (2025) — a 7.6% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mach Natural Resour… (MNR) | 35.3% | 19.1% | -45.8% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 21.2% | 26.9% | +27.0% |
Apple Inc.'s net margin went from 21% (2016) to 27% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 18.4 | 36.4 | +97.8% |
Apple Inc. has traded in a 13x–41x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~35x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mach Natural Resour… (MNR) | 1.46 | 1.9 | +30.1% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 2.08 | 7.46 | +258.7% |
Apple Inc.'s EPS grew from $2.08 (2016) to $7.46 (2025) — a 15% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Mach Natural Resources LP generated $285M FCF in 2024 (+81% vs 2021). Apple Inc. generated $99B FCF in 2025 (+6% vs 2021).
MNR vs AAPL: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MNR or AAPL a better buy right now?
Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) offers the better valuation at 6.9x trailing P/E (12.9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MNR or AAPL?
On trailing P/E, Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) is the cheapest at 6.9x versus Apple Inc. at 35.4x. On forward P/E, Mach Natural Resources LP is actually cheaper at 12.9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MNR or AAPL?
Over the past 5 years, Apple Inc. (AAPL) delivered a total return of +110.5%, compared to +1.9% for Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR). A $10,000 investment in AAPL five years ago would be worth approximately $21K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1027% versus MNR's +1.9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MNR or AAPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.68β versus Apple Inc.'s 1.28β — meaning AAPL is approximately 89% more volatile than MNR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 64% versus 167% for Apple Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — MNR or AAPL?
Apple Inc. (AAPL) is the more profitable company, earning 26.9% net margin versus 19.1% for Mach Natural Resources LP — meaning it keeps 26.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AAPL leads at 32.0% versus 30.0% for MNR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AAPL leads at 46.9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is MNR or AAPL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) trades at 12.9x forward P/E versus 31.1x for Apple Inc. — 18.2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MNR: 45.9% to $19.00.
07Which pays a better dividend — MNR or AAPL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) offers the highest yield at 24.4%, versus 0.4% for Apple Inc. (AAPL).
08Is MNR or AAPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.68), 24.4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNR: +1.9%, AAPL: +1027%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MNR and AAPL?
These companies operate in different sectors (MNR (Energy) and AAPL (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced. In terms of investment character: MNR is a small-cap deep-value stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. MNR pays a dividend while AAPL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.