Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
MRT logo
MRT
DKNG logo
DKNG
JPM logo
JPM
BAC logo
BAC
FLUT logo
FLUT
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MRT vs DKNG vs JPM vs BAC vs FLUT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MRT
Marti Technologies, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyAMEX • TR
Market Cap$146M
5Y Perf.-82.5%
DKNG
DraftKings Inc.

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$14.38B
5Y Perf.-51.1%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+100.5%
BAC
Bank of America Corporation

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$422.78B
5Y Perf.+34.2%
FLUT
Flutter Entertainment plc

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • IE
Market Cap$19.25B
5Y Perf.-43.1%

MRT vs DKNG vs JPM vs BAC vs FLUT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MRT logoMRT
DKNG logoDKNG
JPM logoJPM
BAC logoBAC
FLUT logoFLUT
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationGambling, Resorts & CasinosBanks - DiversifiedBanks - DiversifiedGambling, Resorts & Casinos
Market Cap$146M$14.38B$896.00B$422.78B$19.25B
Revenue (TTM)$35M$6.29B$280.33B$191.57B$17.02B
Net Income (TTM)$-53M$59M$57.05B$30.51B$-457M
Gross Margin47.5%41.8%60.0%56.1%44.2%
Operating Margin-101.9%0.6%25.9%19.7%4.4%
Forward P/E122.9x14.4x12.6x19.5x
Total Debt$87M$1.93B$942.38B$365.90B$13.35B
Cash & Equiv.$8M$1.60B$343.34B$231.84B$3.83B

MRT vs DKNG vs JPM vs BAC vs FLUTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MRT
DKNG
JPM
BAC
FLUT
StockAug 21Jun 26Return
Marti Technologies,… (MRT)10017.5-82.5%
DraftKings Inc. (DKNG)10048.9-51.1%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100200.5+100.5%
Bank of America Cor… (BAC)100134.2+34.2%
Flutter Entertainme… (FLUT)10056.9-43.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MRT vs DKNG vs JPM vs BAC vs FLUT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Marti Technologies, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. DKNG and BAC also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
MRT
Marti Technologies, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

MRT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.62, current ratio 0.97x
  • 110.3% revenue growth vs BAC's -0.5%
  • Beta 0.62 vs FLUT's 0.94
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
DKNG
DraftKings Inc.
The Growth Play

DKNG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 99.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.3%
  • 1.3% ROA vs MRT's -264.1%, ROIC -0.9% vs -147.7%
Best for: growth exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs BAC's 368.2%
  • PEG 0.81 vs BAC's 0.82
  • NIM 2.2% vs BAC's 1.8%
  • Lower P/E (14.4x vs 19.5x)
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
The Banking Pick

BAC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 2.3%
  • Beta 0.86, yield 2.3%, current ratio 0.42x
  • +28.1% vs FLUT's -59.2%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
FLUT
Flutter Entertainment plc
The Consumer Cyclical Pick

Among these 5 stocks, FLUT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMRT logoMRT110.3% revenue growth vs BAC's -0.5%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.4x vs 19.5x)
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs MRT's -151.1%
Stability / SafetyMRT logoMRTBeta 0.62 vs FLUT's 0.94
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs BAC's 2.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)BAC logoBAC+28.1% vs FLUT's -59.2%
Efficiency (ROA)DKNG logoDKNG1.3% ROA vs MRT's -264.1%, ROIC -0.9% vs -147.7%

MRT vs DKNG vs JPM vs BAC vs FLUT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
MRTMarti Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Other Member
50.3%$298,798
Fuel
32.5%$192,849
Electricity
17.2%$102,030
DKNGDraftKings Inc.
FY 2025
Product and Service, Other
100.0%$423M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
BACBank of America Corporation
FY 2024
Loans and Leases
32.2%$62.0B
other interest income
14.7%$28.3B
Debt securities
13.5%$26.0B
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell
10.3%$19.9B
Investment And Brokerage Services
9.2%$17.8B
Market making and similar activities
6.7%$13.0B
Trading account assets
5.4%$10.4B
Other (4)
7.8%$15.1B
FLUTFlutter Entertainment plc
FY 2025
International Segment
57.5%$9.4B
United States Segment
42.5%$7.0B

MRT vs DKNG vs JPM vs BAC vs FLUT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGFLUT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 8037.2x MRT's $35M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MRT's -151.1%. On growth, MRT holds the edge at +115.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMRT logoMRTMarti Technologie…DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…FLUT logoFLUTFlutter Entertain…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$35M$6.3B$280.3B$191.6B$17.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$31M$313M$81.4B$40.0B$2.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$53M$59M$57.0B$30.5B-$457M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$18M$679M$100.9B$12.6B$728M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+47.5%+41.8%+60.0%+56.1%+44.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-101.9%+0.6%+25.9%+19.7%+4.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-151.1%+0.9%+20.4%+15.9%-2.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-53.0%+10.8%+36.0%+6.6%+4.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+115.4%+16.8%+17.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+33.6%+157.7%+16.0%+18.3%-22.3%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — JPM and BAC and FLUT each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 14.7x trailing earnings, BAC trades at a 8% valuation discount to JPM's 16.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs BAC's 0.95x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricMRT logoMRTMarti Technologie…DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…FLUT logoFLUTFlutter Entertain…
Market CapShares × price$146M$14.4B$896.0B$422.8B$19.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$225M$14.7B$1.50T$556.8B$28.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-3.21x-3580.25x16.00x14.66x-63.96x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.122.88x14.40x12.56x19.53x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x0.95x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple56.63x18.36x13.92x11.32x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.73x2.37x3.20x2.21x1.18x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share22.77x2.47x1.39x2.04x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF22.20x8.88x33.52x17.84x
Evenly matched — JPM and BAC and FLUT each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — DKNG and JPM each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-4 for FLUT. BAC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DKNG's 3.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DKNG scores 7/9 vs FLUT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMRT logoMRTMarti Technologie…DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…FLUT logoFLUTFlutter Entertain…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.9%+15.9%+10.1%-4.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-2.6%+1.3%+1.3%+0.9%-1.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-147.7%-0.9%+4.5%+3.5%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-138.0%-0.6%+8.9%+4.5%+4.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–957574
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage3.06x2.60x1.21x1.38x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$79M$330M$599.0B$134.1B$9.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$8M$1.6B$343.3B$231.8B$3.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$87M$1.9B$942.4B$365.9B$13.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-2.71x4.48x0.74x0.48x0.63x
Evenly matched — DKNG and JPM each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,753 for MRT. Over the past 12 months, BAC leads with a +28.1% total return vs FLUT's -59.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs MRT's -45.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMRT logoMRTMarti Technologie…DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…FLUT logoFLUTFlutter Entertain…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-26.7%-18.7%-0.5%+1.1%-49.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-37.5%-23.6%+21.8%+28.1%-59.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-83.9%+13.9%+138.2%+103.0%-42.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-82.5%-42.7%+118.2%+47.1%-42.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-63.0%+195.9%+465.8%+368.2%-8.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-45.5%+4.4%+33.6%+26.6%-16.7%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MRT and BAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MRT is the less volatile stock with a 0.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLUT's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BAC currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs FLUT's 35.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMRT logoMRTMarti Technologie…DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…FLUT logoFLUTFlutter Entertain…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.62x0.87x0.94x0.86x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.15$48.78$337.25$57.55$313.69
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.55$20.46$262.71$43.66$91.52
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+54.0%+59.5%+95.1%+97.3%+35.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10038.172.159.168.363.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded25K12.1M7.0M31.7M2.7M
Evenly matched — MRT and BAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — JPM and BAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MRT as "Hold", DKNG as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", BAC as "Buy", FLUT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 88.2% upside for MRT (target: $3) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, BAC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.26% vs JPM's 1.86%.

MetricMRT logoMRTMarti Technologie…DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…FLUT logoFLUTFlutter Entertain…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$3.20$35.75$339.75$61.13$192.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts148615424
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%+2.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises015121
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95$1.27
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.3%+5.8%+3.9%+5.1%+5.8%
Evenly matched — JPM and BAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Total Returns. 4 categories are tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MRT vs DKNG vs JPM vs BAC vs FLUT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MRT or DKNG or JPM or BAC or FLUT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Marti Technologies, Inc.

(MRT) is the stronger pick with 110. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Bank of America Corporation (BAC) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (12. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MRT or DKNG or JPM or BAC or FLUT?

On trailing P/E, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the cheapest at 14.

7x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 16. 0x. On forward P/E, Bank of America Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus Bank of America Corporation's 0. 82x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MRT or DKNG or JPM or BAC or FLUT?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -82. 5% for Marti Technologies, Inc. (MRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus MRT's -63. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MRT or DKNG or JPM or BAC or FLUT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Marti Technologies, Inc.

(MRT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 62β versus Flutter Entertainment plc's 0. 94β — meaning FLUT is approximately 52% more volatile than MRT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 121% versus 3% for DraftKings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MRT or DKNG or JPM or BAC or FLUT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marti Technologies, Inc.

(MRT) is pulling ahead at 110. 3% versus -0. 5% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DraftKings Inc. grew EPS 99. 2% year-over-year, compared to -820. 8% for Flutter Entertainment plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKNG leads at 39. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MRT or DKNG or JPM or BAC or FLUT?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -105. 6% for Marti Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -51. 0% for MRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MRT or DKNG or JPM or BAC or FLUT more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Bank of America Corporation's 0. 82x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) trades at 12. 6x forward P/E versus 122. 9x for DraftKings Inc. — 110. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MRT: 88. 2% to $3. 20.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MRT or DKNG or JPM or BAC or FLUT?

In this comparison, BAC (2.

3% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. MRT, DKNG, FLUT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MRT or DKNG or JPM or BAC or FLUT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

86), 2. 3% yield, +368. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BAC: +368. 2%, FLUT: -8. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MRT and DKNG and JPM and BAC and FLUT?

These companies operate in different sectors (MRT (Technology) and DKNG (Consumer Cyclical) and JPM (Financial Services) and BAC (Financial Services) and FLUT (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MRT is a small-cap high-growth stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; BAC is a large-cap deep-value stock; FLUT is a mid-cap high-growth stock. JPM, BAC pay a dividend while MRT, DKNG, FLUT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.