Software - Application
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MRT vs DKNG vs JPM vs BAC vs FLUT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Diversified
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
MRT vs DKNG vs JPM vs BAC vs FLUT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Diversified | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $146M | $14.38B | $896.00B | $422.78B | $19.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $35M | $6.29B | $280.33B | $191.57B | $17.02B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-53M | $59M | $57.05B | $30.51B | $-457M |
| Gross Margin | 47.5% | 41.8% | 60.0% | 56.1% | 44.2% |
| Operating Margin | -101.9% | 0.6% | 25.9% | 19.7% | 4.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 122.9x | 14.4x | 12.6x | 19.5x |
| Total Debt | $87M | $1.93B | $942.38B | $365.90B | $13.35B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $1.60B | $343.34B | $231.84B | $3.83B |
MRT vs DKNG vs JPM vs BAC vs FLUT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marti Technologies,… (MRT) | 100 | 17.5 | -82.5% |
| DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) | 100 | 48.9 | -51.1% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 200.5 | +100.5% |
| Bank of America Cor… (BAC) | 100 | 134.2 | +34.2% |
| Flutter Entertainme… (FLUT) | 100 | 56.9 | -43.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MRT vs DKNG vs JPM vs BAC vs FLUT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MRT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.62, current ratio 0.97x
- 110.3% revenue growth vs BAC's -0.5%
- Beta 0.62 vs FLUT's 0.94
DKNG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 99.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.3%
- 1.3% ROA vs MRT's -264.1%, ROIC -0.9% vs -147.7%
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs BAC's 368.2%
- PEG 0.81 vs BAC's 0.82
- NIM 2.2% vs BAC's 1.8%
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 19.5x)
BAC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 2.3%
- Beta 0.86, yield 2.3%, current ratio 0.42x
- +28.1% vs FLUT's -59.2%
Among these 5 stocks, FLUT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 110.3% revenue growth vs BAC's -0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 19.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs MRT's -151.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.62 vs FLUT's 0.94 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs BAC's 2.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.1% vs FLUT's -59.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.3% ROA vs MRT's -264.1%, ROIC -0.9% vs -147.7% |
MRT vs DKNG vs JPM vs BAC vs FLUT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MRT vs DKNG vs JPM vs BAC vs FLUT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories
MRT leads 0 • DKNG leads 0 • BAC leads 0 • FLUT leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 8037.2x MRT's $35M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MRT's -151.1%. On growth, MRT holds the edge at +115.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $35M | $6.3B | $280.3B | $191.6B | $17.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$31M | $313M | $81.4B | $40.0B | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$53M | $59M | $57.0B | $30.5B | -$457M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$18M | $679M | $100.9B | $12.6B | $728M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.5% | +41.8% | +60.0% | +56.1% | +44.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -101.9% | +0.6% | +25.9% | +19.7% | +4.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -151.1% | +0.9% | +20.4% | +15.9% | -2.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -53.0% | +10.8% | +36.0% | +6.6% | +4.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +115.4% | +16.8% | — | — | +17.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.6% | +157.7% | +16.0% | +18.3% | -22.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — JPM and BAC and FLUT each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, BAC trades at a 8% valuation discount to JPM's 16.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs BAC's 0.95x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $146M | $14.4B | $896.0B | $422.8B | $19.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $225M | $14.7B | $1.50T | $556.8B | $28.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.21x | -3580.25x | 16.00x | 14.66x | -63.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 122.88x | 14.40x | 12.56x | 19.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.90x | 0.95x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 56.63x | 18.36x | 13.92x | 11.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.73x | 2.37x | 3.20x | 2.21x | 1.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 22.77x | 2.47x | 1.39x | 2.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 22.20x | 8.88x | 33.52x | 17.84x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — DKNG and JPM each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-4 for FLUT. BAC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DKNG's 3.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DKNG scores 7/9 vs FLUT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +7.9% | +15.9% | +10.1% | -4.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.6% | +1.3% | +1.3% | +0.9% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -147.7% | -0.9% | +4.5% | +3.5% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -138.0% | -0.6% | +8.9% | +4.5% | +4.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 3.06x | 2.60x | 1.21x | 1.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $79M | $330M | $599.0B | $134.1B | $9.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $1.6B | $343.3B | $231.8B | $3.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $87M | $1.9B | $942.4B | $365.9B | $13.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.71x | 4.48x | 0.74x | 0.48x | 0.63x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,753 for MRT. Over the past 12 months, BAC leads with a +28.1% total return vs FLUT's -59.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs MRT's -45.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -26.7% | -18.7% | -0.5% | +1.1% | -49.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -37.5% | -23.6% | +21.8% | +28.1% | -59.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.9% | +13.9% | +138.2% | +103.0% | -42.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.5% | -42.7% | +118.2% | +47.1% | -42.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.0% | +195.9% | +465.8% | +368.2% | -8.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -45.5% | +4.4% | +33.6% | +26.6% | -16.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MRT and BAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MRT is the less volatile stock with a 0.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLUT's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BAC currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs FLUT's 35.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.62x | 0.87x | 0.94x | 0.86x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.15 | $48.78 | $337.25 | $57.55 | $313.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.55 | $20.46 | $262.71 | $43.66 | $91.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.0% | +59.5% | +95.1% | +97.3% | +35.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.1 | 72.1 | 59.1 | 68.3 | 63.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 25K | 12.1M | 7.0M | 31.7M | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — JPM and BAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MRT as "Hold", DKNG as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", BAC as "Buy", FLUT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 88.2% upside for MRT (target: $3) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, BAC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.26% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.20 | $35.75 | $339.75 | $61.13 | $192.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 48 | 61 | 54 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.9% | +2.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 15 | 12 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $5.95 | $1.27 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +5.8% | +3.9% | +5.1% | +5.8% |
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Total Returns. 4 categories are tied.
MRT vs DKNG vs JPM vs BAC vs FLUT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MRT or DKNG or JPM or BAC or FLUT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Marti Technologies, Inc.
(MRT) is the stronger pick with 110. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Bank of America Corporation (BAC) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (12. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MRT or DKNG or JPM or BAC or FLUT?
On trailing P/E, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the cheapest at 14.
7x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 16. 0x. On forward P/E, Bank of America Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus Bank of America Corporation's 0. 82x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MRT or DKNG or JPM or BAC or FLUT?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -82. 5% for Marti Technologies, Inc. (MRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus MRT's -63. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MRT or DKNG or JPM or BAC or FLUT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Marti Technologies, Inc.
(MRT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 62β versus Flutter Entertainment plc's 0. 94β — meaning FLUT is approximately 52% more volatile than MRT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 121% versus 3% for DraftKings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MRT or DKNG or JPM or BAC or FLUT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marti Technologies, Inc.
(MRT) is pulling ahead at 110. 3% versus -0. 5% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DraftKings Inc. grew EPS 99. 2% year-over-year, compared to -820. 8% for Flutter Entertainment plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKNG leads at 39. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MRT or DKNG or JPM or BAC or FLUT?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -105. 6% for Marti Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -51. 0% for MRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MRT or DKNG or JPM or BAC or FLUT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Bank of America Corporation's 0. 82x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) trades at 12. 6x forward P/E versus 122. 9x for DraftKings Inc. — 110. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MRT: 88. 2% to $3. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — MRT or DKNG or JPM or BAC or FLUT?
In this comparison, BAC (2.
3% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. MRT, DKNG, FLUT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MRT or DKNG or JPM or BAC or FLUT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
86), 2. 3% yield, +368. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BAC: +368. 2%, FLUT: -8. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MRT and DKNG and JPM and BAC and FLUT?
These companies operate in different sectors (MRT (Technology) and DKNG (Consumer Cyclical) and JPM (Financial Services) and BAC (Financial Services) and FLUT (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MRT is a small-cap high-growth stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; BAC is a large-cap deep-value stock; FLUT is a mid-cap high-growth stock. JPM, BAC pay a dividend while MRT, DKNG, FLUT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.