MXC vs FANG

For growth investors, Diamondback Energy, Inc.

(FANG) is the stronger pick with 36. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 4% for Mexco Energy Corporation (MXC). Mexco Energy Corporation (MXC) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) a "Buy" — based on 51 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Mexco Energy Corporation (MXC) is the cheapest at 9.

8x versus Diamondback Energy, Inc. at 32. 0x.

Over the past 5 years, Diamondback Energy, Inc.

(FANG) delivered a total return of +150. 5%, compared to +4. 8% for Mexco Energy Corporation (MXC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MXC returned +207. 8% versus FANG's +146. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mexco Energy Corporation (MXC) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

87β versus Diamondback Energy, Inc. 's -0. 13β — meaning FANG is approximately -85% more volatile than MXC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mexco Energy Corporation (MXC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 34% for Diamondback Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Diamondback Energy, Inc.

(FANG) is pulling ahead at 36. 3% versus 11. 4% for Mexco Energy Corporation (MXC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mexco Energy Corporation grew EPS 30. 6% year-over-year, compared to -63. 1% for Diamondback Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FANG leads at 16. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Mexco Energy Corporation (MXC) is the more profitable company, earning 23.

3% net margin versus 11. 1% for Diamondback Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FANG leads at 32. 7% versus 26. 5% for MXC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MXC leads at 44. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) offers the highest yield at 2. 2%, versus 1. 3% for Mexco Energy Corporation (MXC).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Mexco Energy Corporation (MXC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

87), 1. 3% yield, +207. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MXC: +207. 8%, FANG: +146. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MXC is a small-cap deep-value stock; FANG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.