Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
NAKA logo
NAKA
TALK logo
TALK
OPRX logo
OPRX
DOCS logo
DOCS
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NAKA vs TALK vs OPRX vs DOCS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NAKA
Nakamoto Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$79M
5Y Perf.-96.3%
TALK
Talkspace, Inc.

Medical - Care Facilities

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$871M
5Y Perf.+98.5%
OPRX
OptimizeRx Corporation

Medical - Healthcare Information Services

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$100M
5Y Perf.-55.9%
DOCS
Doximity, Inc.

Medical - Healthcare Information Services

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.87B
5Y Perf.-25.4%

NAKA vs TALK vs OPRX vs DOCS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NAKA logoNAKA
TALK logoTALK
OPRX logoOPRX
DOCS logoDOCS
IndustryFinancial - Capital MarketsMedical - Care FacilitiesMedical - Healthcare Information ServicesMedical - Healthcare Information Services
Market Cap$79M$871M$100M$3.87B
Revenue (TTM)$4M$238M$107M$645M
Net Income (TTM)$-290M$1M$7M$196M
Gross Margin-376.0%42.2%69.0%89.1%
Operating Margin-82.2%-1.2%13.6%33.3%
Forward P/E37.0x5.6x14.4x
Total Debt$210M$0.00$26M$10M
Cash & Equiv.$23M$37M$23M$219M

NAKA vs TALK vs OPRX vs DOCSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NAKA
TALK
OPRX
DOCS
StockMay 24Jun 26Return
Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA)1003.7-96.3%
Talkspace, Inc. (TALK)100198.5+98.5%
OptimizeRx Corporat… (OPRX)10044.1-55.9%
Doximity, Inc. (DOCS)10074.6-25.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NAKA vs TALK vs OPRX vs DOCS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TALK leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Doximity, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. OPRX also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇TALK emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
NAKA
Nakamoto Inc.
The Secondary Option

NAKA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
TALK
Talkspace, Inc.
The Growth Play

TALK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 22.0%, EPS growth -78.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.2%
  • -48.5% 10Y total return vs OPRX's 56.9%
  • Beta 0.73, current ratio 6.38x
  • 22.0% revenue growth vs NAKA's -33.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
OPRX
OptimizeRx Corporation
The Income Pick

OPRX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.18
  • Lower P/E (5.6x vs 14.4x)
Best for: income & stability
DOCS
Doximity, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

DOCS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.75, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 6.09x
  • 30.4% margin vs NAKA's -74.0%
  • 16.5% ROA vs NAKA's -56.5%, ROIC 19.8% vs -42.1%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTALK logoTALK22.0% revenue growth vs NAKA's -33.0%
ValueOPRX logoOPRXLower P/E (5.6x vs 14.4x)
Quality / MarginsDOCS logoDOCS30.4% margin vs NAKA's -74.0%
Stability / SafetyTALK logoTALKBeta 0.73 vs NAKA's 2.88
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)TALK logoTALK+85.1% vs NAKA's -99.3%
Efficiency (ROA)DOCS logoDOCS16.5% ROA vs NAKA's -56.5%, ROIC 19.8% vs -42.1%

NAKA vs TALK vs OPRX vs DOCS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NAKANakamoto Inc.
FY 2025
Product Retail Sales
100.0%$1,479
TALKTalkspace, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

OPRXOptimizeRx Corporation
FY 2025
Other Revenue
100.0%$215,000
DOCSDoximity, Inc.
FY 2026
Subscription
94.3%$608M
Service, Other
5.7%$36M

NAKA vs TALK vs OPRX vs DOCS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTALKLAGGINGNAKA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

DOCS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

DOCS is the larger business by revenue, generating $645M annually — 164.5x NAKA's $4M. DOCS is the more profitable business, keeping 30.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NAKA's -74.0%. On growth, NAKA holds the edge at +3.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNAKA logoNAKANakamoto Inc.TALK logoTALKTalkspace, Inc.OPRX logoOPRXOptimizeRx Corpor…DOCS logoDOCSDoximity, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$4M$238M$107M$645M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$320M$2M$19M$227M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$290M$1M$7M$196M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$46M-$6M$14M$215M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-3.8%+42.2%+69.0%+89.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-82.2%-1.2%+13.6%+33.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-74.0%+0.5%+6.4%+30.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-11.7%-2.7%+13.4%+33.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.6%+18.2%-9.5%+5.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-88.4%+78.0%-67.7%
DOCS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

OPRX leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 19.7x trailing earnings, OPRX trades at a 85% valuation discount to TALK's 130.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OPRX's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TALK's 138.3x.

MetricNAKA logoNAKANakamoto Inc.TALK logoTALKTalkspace, Inc.OPRX logoOPRXOptimizeRx Corpor…DOCS logoDOCSDoximity, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$79M$871M$100M$3.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$266M$834M$103M$3.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.43x130.00x19.70x21.10x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.36.96x5.65x14.43x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.40x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple138.33x6.26x17.02x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue43.19x3.81x0.91x6.00x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.10x7.72x0.79x4.33x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF5.35x
OPRX leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

DOCS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

DOCS delivers a 19.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-85 for NAKA. DOCS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NAKA's 0.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OPRX scores 7/9 vs NAKA's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricNAKA logoNAKANakamoto Inc.TALK logoTALKTalkspace, Inc.OPRX logoOPRXOptimizeRx Corpor…DOCS logoDOCSDoximity, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-84.8%+1.0%+5.5%+19.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-56.5%+0.9%+4.0%+16.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-42.1%+3.9%+6.8%+19.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-76.2%+2.7%+7.8%+20.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92676
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.41x0.20x0.01x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$187M-$37M$3M-$209M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$23M$37M$23M$219M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$210M$0$26M$10M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-24.72x1.89x2.84x
DOCS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TALK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TALK five years ago would be worth $5,268 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $374 for NAKA. Over the past 12 months, TALK leads with a +85.1% total return vs NAKA's -99.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TALK at 62.1% vs NAKA's -66.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNAKA logoNAKANakamoto Inc.TALK logoTALKTalkspace, Inc.OPRX logoOPRXOptimizeRx Corpor…DOCS logoDOCSDoximity, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-72.3%+48.1%-57.2%-52.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-99.3%+85.1%-61.4%-63.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.3%+326.2%-64.6%-36.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.3%-47.3%-89.8%-61.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.3%-48.5%+56.9%-61.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-66.6%+62.1%-29.2%-13.9%
TALK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

TALK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

TALK is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NAKA's 2.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TALK currently trades 99.4% from its 52-week high vs NAKA's 0.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNAKA logoNAKANakamoto Inc.TALK logoTALKTalkspace, Inc.OPRX logoOPRXOptimizeRx Corpor…DOCS logoDOCSDoximity, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.88x0.73x2.18x0.75x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$679.20$5.23$22.25$76.51
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.38$2.22$4.57$17.16
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+0.7%+99.4%+23.9%+27.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10035.456.846.140.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded274K1.5M442K3.9M
TALK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

OPRX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: NAKA as "Buy", TALK as "Hold", OPRX as "Buy", DOCS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 219.5% upside for OPRX (target: $17) vs 1.0% for TALK (target: $5).

MetricNAKA logoNAKANakamoto Inc.TALK logoTALKTalkspace, Inc.OPRX logoOPRXOptimizeRx Corpor…DOCS logoDOCSDoximity, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$8.00$5.25$17.00$29.47
# AnalystsCovering analysts2101523
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.4%+2.0%0.0%+11.2%
OPRX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

DOCS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OPRX leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).

Best OverallTalkspace, Inc. (TALK)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NAKA vs TALK vs OPRX vs DOCS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NAKA or TALK or OPRX or DOCS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Talkspace, Inc.

(TALK) is the stronger pick with 22. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -33. 0% for Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA). OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) offers the better valuation at 19. 7x trailing P/E (5. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NAKA or TALK or OPRX or DOCS?

On trailing P/E, OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) is the cheapest at 19.

7x versus Talkspace, Inc. at 130. 0x. On forward P/E, OptimizeRx Corporation is actually cheaper at 5. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NAKA or TALK or OPRX or DOCS?

Over the past 5 years, Talkspace, Inc.

(TALK) delivered a total return of -47. 3%, compared to -96. 3% for Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OPRX returned +56. 9% versus NAKA's -96. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NAKA or TALK or OPRX or DOCS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Talkspace, Inc.

(TALK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Nakamoto Inc. 's 2. 88β — meaning NAKA is approximately 292% more volatile than TALK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 41% for Nakamoto Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NAKA or TALK or OPRX or DOCS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Talkspace, Inc.

(TALK) is pulling ahead at 22. 0% versus -33. 0% for Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: OptimizeRx Corporation grew EPS 124. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1452. 2% for Nakamoto Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TALK leads at 24. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NAKA or TALK or OPRX or DOCS?

Doximity, Inc.

(DOCS) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 4% net margin versus -28. 7% for Nakamoto Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DOCS leads at 33. 3% versus -108. 2% for NAKA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DOCS leads at 89. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NAKA or TALK or OPRX or DOCS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) trades at 5.

6x forward P/E versus 37. 0x for Talkspace, Inc. — 31. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OPRX: 219. 5% to $17. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NAKA or TALK or OPRX or DOCS?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is NAKA or TALK or OPRX or DOCS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Talkspace, Inc.

(TALK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73)). Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA) carries a higher beta of 2. 88 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TALK: -48. 5%, NAKA: -96. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NAKA and TALK and OPRX and DOCS?

These companies operate in different sectors (NAKA (Financial Services) and TALK (Healthcare) and OPRX (Healthcare) and DOCS (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: NAKA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TALK is a small-cap high-growth stock; OPRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; DOCS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.