Packaged Foods
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
NCRA vs WMT vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Discount Stores
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
NCRA vs WMT vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Discount Stores | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $2M | $947.59B | $342.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11M | $725.30B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $23.06B | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 1.4% | 25.0% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | -25.2% | 4.2% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 40.9x | 24.3x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $67.09B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $10.73B | $10.27B |
NCRA vs WMT vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nocera, Inc. (NCRA) | 100 | 3.7 | -96.3% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 253.9 | +153.9% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 165.1 | +65.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NCRA vs WMT vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NCRA plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
WMT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 434.3% 10Y total return vs KO's 112.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.01, Low D/E 63.2%, current ratio 0.79x
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.15, yield 2.6%
- PEG 2.18 vs WMT's 3.72
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.7% revenue growth vs NCRA's -35.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs NCRA's -34.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs NCRA's 1.68, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +22.3% vs NCRA's -83.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs NCRA's -52.5%, ROIC 15.8% vs -70.0% |
NCRA vs WMT vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NCRA vs WMT vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $725.3B annually — 63782.1x NCRA's $11M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NCRA's -34.0%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11M | $725.3B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $41.4B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $23.1B | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $12.6B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +25.0% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -25.2% | +4.2% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -34.0% | +3.2% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -26.9% | +1.7% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -49.8% | +7.3% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.9% | +19.6% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
NCRA leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.1x trailing earnings, KO trades at a 40% valuation discount to WMT's 43.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), KO offers better value at 2.34x vs WMT's 3.96x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $947.6B | $342.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2M | $1.00T | $377.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.84x | 43.55x | 26.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 40.95x | 24.31x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.96x | 2.34x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 22.80x | 25.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.22x | 1.33x | 7.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.09x | 8.98x | 10.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 63.50x | 64.59x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-132 for NCRA. WMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.63x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NCRA's 3.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs NCRA's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -132.0% | +22.7% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -52.5% | +8.1% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -70.0% | +14.4% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -35.9% | +17.5% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.31x | 0.63x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$697,307 | $56.4B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $10.7B | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $67.1B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 11.70x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $26,191 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $343 for NCRA. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +22.3% total return vs NCRA's -83.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 34.5% vs NCRA's -51.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -80.3% | +5.9% | +15.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -83.7% | +22.3% | +15.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.7% | +143.4% | +40.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.6% | +161.9% | +58.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.4% | +434.3% | +112.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -51.6% | +34.5% | +12.0% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NCRA's 1.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs NCRA's 7.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.68x | 0.01x | -0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.40 | $135.16 | $82.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.16 | $93.43 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +7.0% | +88.0% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.8 | 38.5 | 37.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.2M | 18.0M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WMT as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 17.3% upside for WMT (target: $139) vs 8.6% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.56% vs WMT's 0.79%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $139.44 | $86.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 66 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 52 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.94 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NCRA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
NCRA vs WMT vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NCRA or WMT or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Nocera, Inc. (NCRA). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 26. 1x trailing P/E (24. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Walmart Inc. (WMT) a "Buy" — based on 66 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NCRA or WMT or KO?
On trailing P/E, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the cheapest at 26.
1x versus Walmart Inc. at 43. 5x. On forward P/E, The Coca-Cola Company is actually cheaper at 24. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Coca-Cola Company wins at 2. 18x versus Walmart Inc. 's 3. 72x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NCRA or WMT or KO?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +161. 9%, compared to -96. 6% for Nocera, Inc. (NCRA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +434. 3% versus NCRA's -97. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NCRA or WMT or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus Nocera, Inc. 's 1. 68β — meaning NCRA is approximately -1234% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Walmart Inc. (WMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 63% versus 3% for Nocera, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NCRA or WMT or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus -35. 2% for Nocera, Inc. (NCRA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -11. 1% for Nocera, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMT leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NCRA or WMT or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -25. 7% for Nocera, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -22. 3% for NCRA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NCRA or WMT or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 18x versus Walmart Inc. 's 3. 72x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) trades at 24. 3x forward P/E versus 40. 9x for Walmart Inc. — 16. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WMT: 17. 3% to $139. 44.
08Which pays a better dividend — NCRA or WMT or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
6% yield), WMT (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. NCRA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NCRA or WMT or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01), 0. 8% yield, +434. 3% 10Y return). Nocera, Inc. (NCRA) carries a higher beta of 1. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +434. 3%, NCRA: -97. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NCRA and WMT and KO?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
WMT, KO pay a dividend while NCRA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.