Packaged Foods
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
NCRA vs WMT vs TGT vs RELI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Discount Stores
Discount Stores
Insurance - Brokers
NCRA vs WMT vs TGT vs RELI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Discount Stores | Discount Stores | Insurance - Brokers |
| Market Cap | $2M | $947.59B | $55.67B | $554K |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11M | $725.30B | $105.47B | $13M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $23.06B | $3.61B | $-7M |
| Gross Margin | 1.4% | 25.0% | 25.7% | -14.5% |
| Operating Margin | -25.2% | 4.2% | 4.8% | -66.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 40.9x | 14.6x | — |
| Total Debt | $7M | $67.09B | $20.29B | $13M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $10.73B | $5.49B | $373K |
NCRA vs WMT vs TGT vs RELI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nocera, Inc. (NCRA) | 100 | 3.7 | -96.3% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 253.9 | +153.9% |
| Target Corporation (TGT) | 100 | 67.7 | -32.3% |
| Reliance Global Gro… (RELI) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NCRA vs WMT vs TGT vs RELI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NCRA plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
WMT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 434.3% 10Y total return vs TGT's 127.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.01, Low D/E 63.2%, current ratio 0.79x
- 4.7% revenue growth vs NCRA's -35.2%
TGT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 43 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 3.7%
- Beta 0.74, yield 3.7%, current ratio 0.94x
- Better valuation composite
- 3.4% margin vs RELI's -53.4%
RELI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.7% revenue growth vs NCRA's -35.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.4% margin vs RELI's -53.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs NCRA's 1.68, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield, 43-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.9% vs NCRA's -83.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.1% ROA vs NCRA's -52.5%, ROIC 14.4% vs -70.0% |
NCRA vs WMT vs TGT vs RELI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NCRA vs WMT vs TGT vs RELI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TGT leads in 2 of 6 categories
WMT leads 2 • NCRA leads 0 • RELI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $725.3B annually — 63782.1x NCRA's $11M. TGT is the more profitable business, keeping 3.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RELI's -53.4%. On growth, WMT holds the edge at +7.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11M | $725.3B | $105.5B | $13M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $41.4B | $8.2B | -$7M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $23.1B | $3.6B | -$7M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $12.6B | $4.2B | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +25.0% | +25.7% | -14.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -25.2% | +4.2% | +4.8% | -66.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -34.0% | +3.2% | +3.4% | -53.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -26.9% | +1.7% | +3.9% | -18.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -49.8% | +7.3% | +2.9% | -27.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.9% | +19.6% | -24.7% | +70.1% |
Valuation Metrics
TGT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.1x trailing earnings, TGT trades at a 65% valuation discount to WMT's 43.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TGT's 8.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WMT's 22.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $947.6B | $55.7B | $553,552 |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2M | $1.00T | $70.5B | $13M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.84x | 43.55x | 15.08x | -0.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 40.95x | 14.62x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.96x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 22.80x | 8.83x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.22x | 1.33x | 0.53x | 0.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.09x | 8.98x | 3.45x | 0.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 63.50x | 19.64x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TGT delivers a 22.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-181 for RELI. WMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.63x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RELI's 4.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMT scores 6/9 vs NCRA's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -132.0% | +22.7% | +22.8% | -181.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -52.5% | +8.1% | +6.1% | -41.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -70.0% | +14.4% | +12.0% | -32.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -35.9% | +17.5% | +12.9% | -45.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.31x | 0.63x | 1.26x | 4.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$697,307 | $56.4B | $14.8B | $13M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $10.7B | $5.5B | $372,695 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $67.1B | $20.3B | $13M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 11.70x | 11.19x | -4.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $26,191 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3 for RELI. Over the past 12 months, TGT leads with a +35.9% total return vs NCRA's -83.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 34.5% vs RELI's -84.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -80.3% | +5.9% | +24.2% | -54.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -83.7% | +22.3% | +35.9% | -81.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.7% | +143.4% | +4.1% | -99.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.6% | +161.9% | -37.7% | -100.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.4% | +434.3% | +127.8% | -100.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -51.6% | +34.5% | +1.4% | -84.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WMT and TGT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NCRA's 1.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TGT currently trades 92.1% from its 52-week high vs RELI's 6.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.68x | 0.01x | 0.74x | 1.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.40 | $135.16 | $133.07 | $3.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.16 | $93.43 | $83.44 | $0.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +7.0% | +88.0% | +92.1% | +6.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.8 | 38.5 | 47.8 | 42.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.2M | 18.0M | 4.2M | 2.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WMT and TGT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WMT as "Buy", TGT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 17.3% upside for WMT (target: $139) vs 6.2% for TGT (target: $130). For income investors, TGT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.68% vs WMT's 0.79%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $139.44 | $130.20 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 66 | 60 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% | +3.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 52 | 43 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.94 | $4.51 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% | +0.7% | 0.0% |
TGT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WMT leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
NCRA vs WMT vs TGT vs RELI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NCRA or WMT or TGT or RELI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Nocera, Inc. (NCRA). Target Corporation (TGT) offers the better valuation at 15. 1x trailing P/E (14. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Walmart Inc. (WMT) a "Buy" — based on 66 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NCRA or WMT or TGT or RELI?
On trailing P/E, Target Corporation (TGT) is the cheapest at 15.
1x versus Walmart Inc. at 43. 5x. On forward P/E, Target Corporation is actually cheaper at 14. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NCRA or WMT or TGT or RELI?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +161. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for Reliance Global Group, Inc. (RELI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +434. 3% versus RELI's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NCRA or WMT or TGT or RELI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Nocera, Inc. 's 1. 68β — meaning NCRA is approximately 26530% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Walmart Inc. (WMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 63% versus 4% for Reliance Global Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NCRA or WMT or TGT or RELI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus -35. 2% for Nocera, Inc. (NCRA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Walmart Inc. grew EPS 13. 3% year-over-year, compared to -11. 1% for Nocera, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RELI leads at 13. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NCRA or WMT or TGT or RELI?
Target Corporation (TGT) is the more profitable company, earning 3.
5% net margin versus -64. 5% for Reliance Global Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TGT leads at 4. 6% versus -54. 8% for RELI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TGT leads at 25. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NCRA or WMT or TGT or RELI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Target Corporation (TGT) trades at 14.
6x forward P/E versus 40. 9x for Walmart Inc. — 26. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WMT: 17. 3% to $139. 44.
08Which pays a better dividend — NCRA or WMT or TGT or RELI?
In this comparison, TGT (3.
7% yield), WMT (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. NCRA, RELI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NCRA or WMT or TGT or RELI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01), 0. 8% yield, +434. 3% 10Y return). Nocera, Inc. (NCRA) carries a higher beta of 1. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +434. 3%, NCRA: -97. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NCRA and WMT and TGT and RELI?
These companies operate in different sectors (NCRA (Consumer Defensive) and WMT (Consumer Defensive) and TGT (Consumer Defensive) and RELI (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NCRA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WMT is a large-cap quality compounder stock; TGT is a mid-cap deep-value stock; RELI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. WMT, TGT pay a dividend while NCRA, RELI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.