Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
NERV vs NRXP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
NERV vs NRXP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $32M | $66M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $2M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-415M | $-25M |
| Gross Margin | — | 37.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -7.5% |
| Total Debt | $65M | $631K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $82M | $8M |
NERV vs NRXP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minerva Neuroscienc… (NERV) | 100 | 15.6 | -84.4% |
| NRx Pharmaceuticals… (NRXP) | 100 | 3.7 | -96.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NERV vs NRXP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NERV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.28
- -94.4% 10Y total return vs NRXP's -96.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.28, current ratio 36.29x
NRXP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- EPS growth 43.9%
- -219.6% ROA vs NERV's -6.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 121.0% revenue growth vs NRXP's -7.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.28 vs NRXP's 2.05 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +152.0% vs NRXP's +11.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -219.6% ROA vs NERV's -6.6% |
NERV vs NRXP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NERV vs NRXP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NRXP and NERV operate at a comparable scale, with $2M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $2M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$28M | -$31M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$415M | -$25M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5.4B | -$15M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +37.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -7.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -10.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -6.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +87.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NRXP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $32M | $66M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14M | $59M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.13x | -2.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 54.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NRXP leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NRXP scores 6/9 vs NERV's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.6% | -2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -23.2% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$17M | -$7M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $82M | $8M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $65M | $631,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -34.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — NERV and NRXP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NERV five years ago would be worth $1,905 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $213 for NRXP. Over the past 12 months, NERV leads with a +152.0% total return vs NRXP's +11.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NRXP at -10.5% vs NERV's -12.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.1% | +46.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +152.0% | +11.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.2% | -28.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.0% | -97.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.4% | -96.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.1% | -10.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NERV and NRXP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NERV is the less volatile stock with a 1.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NRXP's 2.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NRXP currently trades 76.0% from its 52-week high vs NERV's 36.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.28x | 2.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.46 | $5.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.57 | $1.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.2% | +76.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.4 | 55.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 154K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NRXP leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
NERV vs NRXP: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NERV or NRXP a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Minerva Neurosciences, Inc.
(NERV) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NERV or NRXP?
Over the past 5 years, Minerva Neurosciences, Inc.
(NERV) delivered a total return of -81. 0%, compared to -97. 9% for NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NRXP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NERV returned -94. 4% versus NRXP's -96. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NERV or NRXP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Minerva Neurosciences, Inc.
(NERV) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 28β versus NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 2. 05β — meaning NRXP is approximately 60% more volatile than NERV relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — NERV or NRXP?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
grew EPS 43. 9% year-over-year, compared to -183. 5% for Minerva Neurosciences, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NERV or NRXP?
Minerva Neurosciences, Inc.
(NERV) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -23. 4% for NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NERV leads at 0. 0% versus -1324. 4% for NRXP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NRXP leads at 58. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — NERV or NRXP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is NERV or NRXP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Minerva Neurosciences, Inc.
(NERV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 28)). NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NRXP) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NERV: -94. 4%, NRXP: -96. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between NERV and NRXP?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.