Auto - Manufacturers
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
NIU vs KNDI vs JPM vs WKHS vs NIO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
Banks - Diversified
Auto - Manufacturers
Auto - Manufacturers
NIU vs KNDI vs JPM vs WKHS vs NIO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Parts | Banks - Diversified | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $175M | $54M | $908.57B | $33M | $11.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.30B | $104M | $280.33B | $25M | $69.42B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-38M | $-51M | $57.05B | $-63M | $-24.31B |
| Gross Margin | 19.6% | 35.3% | 60.0% | -50.3% | 10.3% |
| Operating Margin | -2.0% | -63.8% | 25.9% | -223.7% | -32.6% |
| Forward P/E | 3.2x | — | 14.6x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $639M | $47M | $942.38B | $28M | $26.25B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.14B | $176M | $343.34B | $13M | $26.04B |
NIU vs KNDI vs JPM vs WKHS vs NIO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niu Technologies (NIU) | 100 | 13.5 | -86.5% |
| Kandi Technologies … (KNDI) | 100 | 15.5 | -84.5% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 345.8 | +245.8% |
| Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| NIO Inc. (NIO) | 100 | 65.0 | -35.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NIU vs KNDI vs JPM vs WKHS vs NIO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NIU ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Better valuation composite
KNDI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.30, Low D/E 17.5%, current ratio 2.34x
- Beta 1.30, current ratio 2.34x
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 1.8%
- 481.2% 10Y total return vs NIO's -23.9%
- 20.4% margin vs WKHS's -254.3%
- Beta 0.87 vs WKHS's 1.89
WKHS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 220.6%, EPS growth 86.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 61.6%
- 220.6% revenue growth vs KNDI's -31.5%
- +207.6% vs NIU's -44.3%
Among these 5 stocks, NIO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 220.6% revenue growth vs KNDI's -31.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs WKHS's -254.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs WKHS's 1.89 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +207.6% vs NIU's -44.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.3% ROA vs WKHS's -58.0%, ROIC 4.5% vs -62.2% |
NIU vs KNDI vs JPM vs WKHS vs NIO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NIU vs KNDI vs JPM vs WKHS vs NIO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 5 of 6 categories
NIU leads 1 • KNDI leads 0 • WKHS leads 0 • NIO leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 11258.8x WKHS's $25M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WKHS's -2.5%. On growth, WKHS holds the edge at +5.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.3B | $104M | $280.3B | $25M | $69.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$63M | -$55M | $81.4B | -$52M | -$23.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$38M | -$51M | $57.0B | -$63M | -$24.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $0 | $100.9B | -$45M | -$16.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.6% | +35.3% | +60.0% | -50.3% | +10.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | -63.8% | +25.9% | -2.2% | -32.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | -49.1% | +20.4% | -2.5% | -35.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +2.0% | +36.0% | -179.3% | -23.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.6% | -53.7% | — | +5.8% | +9.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.6% | -48.5% | +16.0% | +57.5% | +7.6% |
Valuation Metrics
NIU leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, JPM's 18.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NIU's 26.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $175M | $54M | $908.6B | $33M | $11.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $101M | -$75M | $1.51T | $48M | $11.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -30.43x | -0.58x | 16.22x | -0.45x | -5.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 3.16x | — | 14.60x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.92x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 26.68x | — | 18.52x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.28x | 0.62x | 3.25x | 1.56x | 0.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.29x | 0.20x | 2.51x | 0.67x | 6.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.73x | 0.31x | 9.01x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-3 for NIO. KNDI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NIO scores 6/9 vs WKHS's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.1% | -13.9% | +15.9% | -2.0% | -2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.3% | -10.7% | +1.3% | -58.0% | -23.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -14.4% | -11.6% | +4.5% | -62.2% | -52.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.1% | -13.3% | +8.9% | -74.3% | -31.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.71x | 0.17x | 2.60x | 0.65x | 2.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$498M | -$129M | $599.0B | $15M | $210M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $176M | $343.3B | $13M | $26.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $639M | $47M | $942.4B | $28M | $26.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.39x | -34.31x | 0.74x | -3.96x | -25.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $23,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8 for WKHS. Over the past 12 months, WKHS leads with a +207.6% total return vs NIU's -44.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.7% vs WKHS's -76.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -31.2% | -23.5% | +0.8% | -45.5% | -2.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -44.3% | -38.6% | +20.9% | +207.6% | +46.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.0% | -84.1% | +138.8% | -98.7% | -46.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.2% | -89.4% | +135.5% | -99.9% | -89.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.0% | -90.8% | +481.2% | -99.8% | -23.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -19.6% | -45.8% | +33.7% | -76.6% | -18.7% |
Risk & Volatility
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WKHS's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs WKHS's 25.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.61x | 1.30x | 0.87x | 1.89x | 1.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.67 | $1.77 | $338.09 | $11.80 | $8.02 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.08 | $0.61 | $269.72 | $0.53 | $3.34 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +38.1% | +36.8% | +96.2% | +25.7% | +62.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 31.5 | 41.1 | 72.1 | 40.7 | 36.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 392K | 108K | 7.4M | 214K | 33.7M |
Analyst Outlook
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NIU as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", NIO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.3% upside for NIO (target: $7) vs 4.5% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.83% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $339.75 | — | $6.54 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | — | 61 | — | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.8% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 15 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $5.95 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
JPM leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NIU leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
NIU vs KNDI vs JPM vs WKHS vs NIO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NIU or KNDI or JPM or WKHS or NIO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Workhorse Group Inc.
(WKHS) is the stronger pick with 220. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -31. 5% for Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. (KNDI). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 2x trailing P/E (14. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Niu Technologies (NIU) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NIU or KNDI or JPM or WKHS or NIO?
On forward P/E, Niu Technologies is actually cheaper at 3.
2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NIU or KNDI or JPM or WKHS or NIO?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +135. 5%, compared to -99. 9% for Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus WKHS's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NIU or KNDI or JPM or WKHS or NIO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Workhorse Group Inc. 's 1. 89β — meaning WKHS is approximately 118% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. (KNDI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NIU or KNDI or JPM or WKHS or NIO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Workhorse Group Inc.
(WKHS) is pulling ahead at 220. 6% versus -31. 5% for Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. (KNDI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Workhorse Group Inc. grew EPS 86. 9% year-over-year, compared to -89. 8% for Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WKHS leads at 61. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NIU or KNDI or JPM or WKHS or NIO?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -302. 1% for Workhorse Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -223. 7% for WKHS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NIU or KNDI or JPM or WKHS or NIO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Niu Technologies (NIU) trades at 3.
2x forward P/E versus 14. 6x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 11. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NIO: 30. 3% to $6. 54.
08Which pays a better dividend — NIU or KNDI or JPM or WKHS or NIO?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. NIU, KNDI, WKHS, NIO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NIU or KNDI or JPM or WKHS or NIO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 1. 8% yield, +481. 2% 10Y return). Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +481. 2%, WKHS: -99. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NIU and KNDI and JPM and WKHS and NIO?
These companies operate in different sectors (NIU (Consumer Cyclical) and KNDI (Consumer Cyclical) and JPM (Financial Services) and WKHS (Consumer Cyclical) and NIO (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NIU is a small-cap high-growth stock; KNDI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; WKHS is a small-cap high-growth stock; NIO is a mid-cap high-growth stock. JPM pays a dividend while NIU, KNDI, WKHS, NIO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.