Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NRC vs DBVT vs SATS vs ALKS vs PRGO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NRC
National Research Corporation

Medical - Healthcare Information Services

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$440M
5Y Perf.-66.4%
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • FR
Market Cap$1636.12T
5Y Perf.-56.5%
SATS
EchoStar Corporation

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$37.23B
5Y Perf.+362.1%
ALKS
Alkermes plc

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • IE
Market Cap$7.03B
5Y Perf.+117.4%
PRGO
Perrigo Company plc

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic

HealthcareNYSE • IE
Market Cap$1.53B
5Y Perf.-80.0%

NRC vs DBVT vs SATS vs ALKS vs PRGO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NRC logoNRC
DBVT logoDBVT
SATS logoSATS
ALKS logoALKS
PRGO logoPRGO
IndustryMedical - Healthcare Information ServicesBiotechnologyCommunication EquipmentBiotechnologyDrug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Market Cap$440M$1636.12T$37.23B$7.03B$1.53B
Revenue (TTM)$139M$0.00$14.80B$1.56B$4.18B
Net Income (TTM)$9M$-168M$-23.27B$153M$-1.82B
Gross Margin55.9%39.1%65.4%34.2%
Operating Margin14.1%-116.5%12.3%-4.1%
Forward P/E22.2x29.5x5.2x
Total Debt$79M$22M$31.01B$70M$3.97B
Cash & Equiv.$4M$194M$1.88B$1.12B$532M

NRC vs DBVT vs SATS vs ALKS vs PRGOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NRC
DBVT
SATS
ALKS
PRGO
StockJun 20May 26Return
National Research C… (NRC)10033.6-66.4%
DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT)10043.5-56.5%
EchoStar Corporation (SATS)100462.1+362.1%
Alkermes plc (ALKS)100217.4+117.4%
Perrigo Company plc (PRGO)10020.0-80.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NRC vs DBVT vs SATS vs ALKS vs PRGO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PRGO leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. National Research Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and operational efficiency and capital deployment. SATS and ALKS also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
NRC
National Research Corporation
The Defensive Pick

NRC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.

  • Beta 0.80, yield 2.5%, current ratio 0.55x
  • Beta 0.80 vs SATS's 1.72
  • 6.6% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0%
Best for: defensive
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, DBVT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
SATS
EchoStar Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

SATS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 222.7% 10Y total return vs NRC's 91.8%
  • +5.4% vs PRGO's -53.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
ALKS
Alkermes plc
The Defensive Pick

ALKS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.96, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 3.55x
  • 9.8% margin vs SATS's -157.2%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
PRGO
Perrigo Company plc
The Income Pick

PRGO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.30, yield 10.4%
  • Rev growth -2.8%, EPS growth -7.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.5%
  • -2.8% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
  • Lower P/E (5.2x vs 29.5x)
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPRGO logoPRGO-2.8% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
ValuePRGO logoPRGOLower P/E (5.2x vs 29.5x)
Quality / MarginsALKS logoALKS9.8% margin vs SATS's -157.2%
Stability / SafetyNRC logoNRCBeta 0.80 vs SATS's 1.72
DividendsPRGO logoPRGO10.4% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs NRC's 2.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)SATS logoSATS+5.4% vs PRGO's -53.9%
Efficiency (ROA)NRC logoNRC6.6% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0%

NRC vs DBVT vs SATS vs ALKS vs PRGO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NRCNational Research Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

DBVTDBV Technologies S.A.

Segment breakdown not available.

SATSEchoStar Corporation
FY 2024
Service revenue
94.5%$15.0B
Equipment sales and other revenue
5.5%$869M
ALKSAlkermes plc
FY 2025
Vivitrol
39.8%$468M
Aristada And Aristada Initio
31.5%$370M
Manufactured Product And Royalty
24.8%$291M
Manufacturing Revenue
3.9%$46M
PRGOPerrigo Company plc
FY 2025
Consumer Self-Care Americas
60.8%$2.6B
Consumer Self-Care International
39.2%$1.7B

NRC vs DBVT vs SATS vs ALKS vs PRGO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLALKSLAGGINGDBVT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ALKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

SATS and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $14.8B and $0 in trailing revenue. ALKS is the more profitable business, keeping 9.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SATS's -157.2%. On growth, ALKS holds the edge at +28.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNRC logoNRCNational Research…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …SATS logoSATSEchoStar Corporat…ALKS logoALKSAlkermes plcPRGO logoPRGOPerrigo Company p…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$139M$0$14.8B$1.6B$4.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$28M-$112M-$16.0B$212M$58M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$9M-$168M-$23.3B$153M-$1.8B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$17M-$151M-$909M$392M$108M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+55.9%+39.1%+65.4%+34.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+14.1%-116.5%+12.3%-4.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+6.5%-157.2%+9.8%-43.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+12.6%-6.1%+25.1%+2.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.7%-5.2%+28.2%-7.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-44.0%+91.5%+28.2%-4.1%-56.4%
ALKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PRGO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 29.5x trailing earnings, ALKS trades at a 21% valuation discount to NRC's 37.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRGO's 7.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALKS's 21.3x.

MetricNRC logoNRCNational Research…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …SATS logoSATSEchoStar Corporat…ALKS logoALKSAlkermes plcPRGO logoPRGOPerrigo Company p…
Market CapShares × price$440M$1636.12T$37.2B$7.0B$1.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$515M$1636.12T$66.4B$6.0B$5.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS37.56x-0.72x-2.56x29.50x-1.07x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.19x5.22x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple17.05x21.28x7.29x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.20x2.48x4.76x0.36x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share31.26x0.63x6.39x3.91x0.52x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF27.96x14.64x10.54x
PRGO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ALKS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

NRC delivers a 57.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $57 in annual profit, vs $-2 for SATS. ALKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NRC's 5.65x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALKS scores 7/9 vs SATS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricNRC logoNRCNational Research…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …SATS logoSATSEchoStar Corporat…ALKS logoALKSAlkermes plcPRGO logoPRGOPerrigo Company p…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+57.2%-130.2%-2.4%+8.8%-50.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+6.6%-89.0%-49.1%+5.4%-19.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+18.8%-32.9%+18.9%+3.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+23.2%-145.7%-41.3%+14.2%+4.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–954374
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage5.65x0.13x5.33x0.04x1.35x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$75M-$172M$29.1B-$1.0B$3.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$4M$194M$1.9B$1.1B$532M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$79M$22M$31.0B$70M$4.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.82x-189.82x-9.93x32.30x-7.20x
ALKS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SATS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SATS five years ago would be worth $47,479 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,310 for DBVT. Over the past 12 months, SATS leads with a +540.5% total return vs PRGO's -53.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SATS at 99.7% vs PRGO's -22.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNRC logoNRCNational Research…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …SATS logoSATSEchoStar Corporat…ALKS logoALKSAlkermes plcPRGO logoPRGOPerrigo Company p…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+9.2%+0.3%+15.2%+49.3%-16.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+45.9%+116.8%+540.5%+39.5%-53.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-49.7%+3.2%+696.0%+44.6%-53.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-52.0%-66.9%+374.8%+82.2%-64.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+91.8%-88.6%+222.7%-9.1%-78.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-20.5%+1.1%+99.7%+13.1%-22.5%
SATS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NRC and ALKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SATS's 1.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKS currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs PRGO's 38.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNRC logoNRCNational Research…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …SATS logoSATSEchoStar Corporat…ALKS logoALKSAlkermes plcPRGO logoPRGOPerrigo Company p…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.80x1.11x1.72x0.96x1.30x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$22.79$26.18$147.25$42.83$28.44
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$11.01$7.53$14.90$25.17$9.23
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+85.7%+72.9%+87.7%+98.5%+38.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10065.045.653.771.753.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded89K231K6.6M2.2M2.6M
Evenly matched — NRC and ALKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

PRGO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: DBVT as "Buy", SATS as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy", PRGO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 227.6% upside for PRGO (target: $36) vs 5.6% for SATS (target: $136). For income investors, PRGO offers the higher dividend yield at 10.41% vs NRC's 2.51%.

MetricNRC logoNRCNational Research…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …SATS logoSATSEchoStar Corporat…ALKS logoALKSAlkermes plcPRGO logoPRGOPerrigo Company p…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$46.33$136.40$46.00$36.20
# AnalystsCovering analysts15112836
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.5%+10.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises100010
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.49$1.15
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+4.6%0.0%+0.1%+0.4%0.0%
PRGO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

ALKS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRGO leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallAlkermes plc (ALKS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NRC vs DBVT vs SATS vs ALKS vs PRGO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NRC or DBVT or SATS or ALKS or PRGO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) is the stronger pick with -2.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). Alkermes plc (ALKS) offers the better valuation at 29. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NRC or DBVT or SATS or ALKS or PRGO?

On trailing P/E, Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the cheapest at 29.

5x versus National Research Corporation at 37. 6x. On forward P/E, Perrigo Company plc is actually cheaper at 5. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NRC or DBVT or SATS or ALKS or PRGO?

Over the past 5 years, EchoStar Corporation (SATS) delivered a total return of +374.

8%, compared to -66. 9% for DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SATS returned +222. 7% versus DBVT's -88. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NRC or DBVT or SATS or ALKS or PRGO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), National Research Corporation (NRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

80β versus EchoStar Corporation's 1. 72β — meaning SATS is approximately 114% more volatile than NRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alkermes plc (ALKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 6% for National Research Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NRC or DBVT or SATS or ALKS or PRGO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) is pulling ahead at -2.

8% versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alkermes plc grew EPS -34. 1% year-over-year, compared to -113. 6% for EchoStar Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALKS leads at 9. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NRC or DBVT or SATS or ALKS or PRGO?

Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the more profitable company, earning 16.

4% net margin versus -155. 1% for EchoStar Corporation — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALKS leads at 17. 2% versus -118. 1% for SATS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALKS leads at 86. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NRC or DBVT or SATS or ALKS or PRGO more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) trades at 5.

2x forward P/E versus 22. 2x for National Research Corporation — 17. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRGO: 227. 6% to $36. 20.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NRC or DBVT or SATS or ALKS or PRGO?

In this comparison, PRGO (10.

4% yield), NRC (2. 5% yield) pay a dividend. DBVT, SATS, ALKS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is NRC or DBVT or SATS or ALKS or PRGO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, National Research Corporation (NRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

80), 2. 5% yield). EchoStar Corporation (SATS) carries a higher beta of 1. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NRC: +91. 8%, SATS: +222. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NRC and DBVT and SATS and ALKS and PRGO?

These companies operate in different sectors (NRC (Healthcare) and DBVT (Healthcare) and SATS (Technology) and ALKS (Healthcare) and PRGO (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: NRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; SATS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock. NRC, PRGO pay a dividend while DBVT, SATS, ALKS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

NRC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DBVT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SATS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ALKS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PRGO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 20%
  • Dividend Yield > 4.1%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.