Comprehensive Stock Comparison

Compare Realty Income Corporation (O) vs Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) Stock

Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.

Tickers 2 / 10100+ Metrics

Selected Stocks

Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.

2 / 10
O
O
Try these comparisons:

Quick Verdict

CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthKIM14.2% revenue growth vs O's 9.1%
ValueKIMLower P/E (30.4x vs 41.8x)
Quality / MarginsKIM27.3% net margin vs O's 18.4%
Stability / SafetyOBeta 0.19 vs KIM's 0.70
DividendsKIM4.3% yield; O pays no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)O+23.6% vs KIM's +11.1%
Efficiency (ROA)KIM3.0% ROA vs O's 1.5%, ROIC 2.7% vs 2.3%
Bottom line: KIM leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the stronger pick for investors who prioritize growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Realty Income Corporation is the better choice for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. As direct sector peers, they can serve as alternatives in the same portfolio allocation.

Who Each Stock Is For

Income & stability

Growth exposure

Long-term compounding (10Y)

Sleep-well-at-night portfolio

Defensive / Recession hedge

Business Model

What each company does and how it makes money

ORealty Income Corporation
Real Estate

Realty Income is a real estate investment trust that owns and leases single-tenant commercial properties to retail and service-oriented businesses. It generates revenue primarily through long-term triple-net leases—where tenants pay rent plus property expenses—with retail clients like convenience stores and drugstores accounting for roughly 80% of its portfolio. The company's moat lies in its massive scale, diversified tenant base, and long-term lease structure that provides predictable monthly cash flow supporting its famous monthly dividend payments.

KIMKimco Realty Corporation
Real Estate

Kimco Realty is a real estate investment trust that owns and operates open-air, grocery-anchored shopping centers and mixed-use properties across the United States. It generates revenue primarily through collecting rent from retail tenants—with grocery stores serving as anchor tenants that drive consistent foot traffic—and earns additional income from property management and development services. The company's competitive advantage lies in its strategic focus on grocery-anchored centers in high-density metropolitan markets, which provides recession-resistant cash flow due to the essential nature of grocery retail.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ORealty Income Corporation
FY 2025
Product And Service, Retail
100.0%$4.3B
KIMKimco Realty Corporation
FY 2018
Revenues from Rental Properties
75.8%$882M
Reimbursement Income
21.2%$246M
Other Rental Property Income
1.8%$21M
Management and Other Fee Incomes
1.3%$15M

Financial Metrics Comparison

Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging

Financial Scorecard

O 3KIM 2
Financial MetricsO4/6 metrics
Valuation MetricsKIM4/6 metrics
Profitability & EfficiencyKIM4/6 metrics
Total ReturnsTie3/6 metrics
Risk & VolatilityO2/2 metrics
Analyst OutlookO1/1 metrics

O leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Risk & Volatility). KIM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Financial Metrics (TTM)

O is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.7B annually — 2.7x KIM's $2.1B. KIM is the more profitable business, keeping 27.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to O's 18.4%. On growth, O holds the edge at +11.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricORealty Income Cor…KIMKimco Realty Corp…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$5.7B$2.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$4.1B$1.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1.1B$584M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$2.8B$630M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+89.8%+69.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+28.3%+36.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+18.4%+27.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+48.5%+29.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.0%+3.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+39.1%-4.3%
O leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

At 42.8x trailing earnings, KIM trades at a 25% valuation discount to O's 57.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, O's 15.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KIM's 19.4x.

MetricORealty Income Cor…KIMKimco Realty Corp…
Market CapShares × price$62.6B$16.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$62.1B$23.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS57.27x42.82x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.41.80x30.43x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate80.25x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple15.16x19.38x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue10.88x7.86x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.51x1.46x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF15.66x23.49x
KIM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KIM delivers a 5.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $3 for O.

MetricORealty Income Cor…KIMKimco Realty Corp…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+2.6%+5.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.5%+3.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.3%+2.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.3%+3.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–955
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.79x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$435M$7.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$435M$689M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$8.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.04x
KIM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (with DRIP)

A $10,000 investment in KIM five years ago would be worth $15,116 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,035 for O. Over the past 12 months, O leads with a +23.6% total return vs KIM's +11.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KIM at 8.8% vs O's 6.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricORealty Income Cor…KIMKimco Realty Corp…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+17.9%+17.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+23.6%+11.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+19.9%+28.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+40.3%+51.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+67.6%+23.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+6.3%+8.8%
Evenly matched — O and KIM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

O is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KIM's 0.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricORealty Income Cor…KIMKimco Realty Corp…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.19x0.70x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$67.94$23.91
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$50.71$17.93
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.6%+98.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10070.776.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded5.4M4.4M
O leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Wall Street rates O as "Hold" and KIM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 2.5% upside for KIM (target: $24) vs -5.4% for O (target: $63). KIM is the only dividend payer here at 4.33% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricORealty Income Cor…KIMKimco Realty Corp…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$63.38$24.14
# AnalystsCovering analysts3336
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises270
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.02
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%
O leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Historical Charts

Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.

Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)

StockMar 20Feb 26Change
Realty Income Corpo… (O)10083.35-16.6%
Kimco Realty Corpor… (KIM)100116.89+16.9%

Kimco Realty Corpor… (KIM) returned +51% over 5 years vs Realty Income Corpo… (O)'s +40%. A $10,000 investment in KIM 5 years ago would be worth $15,116 today (including dividends reinvested).

Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years

Stock20162025Change
Realty Income Corpo… (O)$1.1B$5.7B+421.2%
Kimco Realty Corpor… (KIM)$1.2B$2.0B+74.0%

Realty Income Corporation's revenue grew from $1.1B (2016) to $5.7B (2025) — a 20.1% CAGR.

Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years

Stock20162025Change
Realty Income Corpo… (O)28.6%18.4%-35.6%
Kimco Realty Corpor… (KIM)32.4%20.2%-37.7%

Realty Income Corporation's net margin went from 29% (2016) to 18% (2025).

Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years

Stock20172025Change
Realty Income Corpo… (O)50.248.2-4.0%
Kimco Realty Corpor… (KIM)20.942.6+103.8%

Realty Income Corporation has traded in a 45x–82x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~57x. Kimco Realty Corporation has traded in a 7x–132x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~43x.

Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years

Stock20162025Change
Realty Income Corpo… (O)1.131.17+3.5%
Kimco Realty Corpor… (KIM)0.790.55-30.4%

Realty Income Corporation's EPS grew from $1.13 (2016) to $1.17 (2025) — a 0% CAGR.

Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years

2021
$1B
$619M
2022
$3B
$861M
2023
$3B
$807M
2024
$4B
$681M
2025
$4B
Realty Income Corpo… (O)Kimco Realty Corpor… (KIM)

Realty Income Corporation generated $4B FCF in 2025 (+207% vs 2021). Kimco Realty Corporation generated $681M FCF in 2024 (+10% vs 2021).

Loading custom metrics...

O vs KIM: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is O or KIM a better buy right now?

Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) offers the better valuation at 42.8x trailing P/E (30.4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Realty Income Corporation (O) a "Hold" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — O or KIM?

On trailing P/E, Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) is the cheapest at 42.8x versus Realty Income Corporation at 57.3x. On forward P/E, Kimco Realty Corporation is actually cheaper at 30.4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — O or KIM?

Over the past 5 years, Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) delivered a total return of +51.2%, compared to +40.3% for Realty Income Corporation (O). A $10,000 investment in KIM five years ago would be worth approximately $15K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: O returned +67.6% versus KIM's +23.3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — O or KIM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Realty Income Corporation (O) is the lower-risk stock at 0.19β versus Kimco Realty Corporation's 0.70β — meaning KIM is approximately 268% more volatile than O relative to the S&P 500.

05

Which has better profit margins — O or KIM?

Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) is the more profitable company, earning 20.2% net margin versus 18.4% for Realty Income Corporation — meaning it keeps 20.2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KIM leads at 30.9% versus 28.3% for O. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — O leads at 89.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is O or KIM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) trades at 30.4x forward P/E versus 41.8x for Realty Income Corporation — 11.4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KIM: 2.5% to $24.14.

07

Which pays a better dividend — O or KIM?

In this comparison, KIM (4.3% yield) pays a dividend. O does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is O or KIM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.70), 4.3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KIM: +23.3%, O: +67.6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between O and KIM?

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: O is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KIM is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. KIM pays a dividend while O does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.

📊
Stocks Like

O

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
🛡️
Stocks Like

KIM

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 16%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Better Than Both

Find stocks that beat O and KIM on the metrics you choose

Revenue Growth>
%
(O: 11.0% · KIM: 3.2%)
Net Margin>
%
(O: 18.4% · KIM: 27.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(O: 57.3x · KIM: 42.8x)