Marine Shipping
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PANL vs DSX vs KO vs SBLK vs GNK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Marine Shipping
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Marine Shipping
Marine Shipping
PANL vs DSX vs KO vs SBLK vs GNK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $502M | $295M | $355.61B | $3.09B | $1.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $680M | $214M | $49.28B | $1.09B | $114.70B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $35M | $18M | $13.70B | $142M | $9.32B |
| Gross Margin | 11.7% | 40.5% | 61.7% | 34.5% | 62.9% |
| Operating Margin | 6.7% | 18.9% | 29.3% | 18.3% | 0.0% |
| Forward P/E | 6.3x | 6.1x | 25.3x | 6.8x | 10.9x |
| Total Debt | $372M | $636M | $45.49B | $1.07B | $200M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $103M | $122M | $10.27B | $500M | $56M |
PANL vs DSX vs KO vs SBLK vs GNK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pangaea Logistics S… (PANL) | 100 | 306.0 | +206.0% |
| Diana Shipping Inc. (DSX) | 100 | 159.3 | +59.3% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
| Star Bulk Carriers … (SBLK) | 100 | 411.4 | +311.4% |
| Genco Shipping & Tr… (GNK) | 100 | 383.1 | +283.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PANL vs DSX vs KO vs SBLK vs GNK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PANL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.30, yield 3.3%
- Rev growth 17.8%, EPS growth -52.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -3.3%
- 17.8% revenue growth vs GNK's -19.1%
- 3.3% yield, vs KO's 2.5%
DSX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (6.1x vs 10.9x)
KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 27.8% margin vs PANL's 5.1%
- 13.1% ROA vs DSX's 1.5%, ROIC 15.8% vs 3.1%
SBLK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 10.8% 10Y total return vs PANL's 250.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 43.8%, current ratio 1.78x
- PEG 0.14 vs KO's 2.26
- Beta 0.72 vs DSX's 1.44, lower leverage
GNK is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.92, yield 3.1%, current ratio 2.34x
- +80.3% vs KO's +17.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.8% revenue growth vs GNK's -19.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.1x vs 10.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs PANL's 5.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.72 vs DSX's 1.44, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.3% yield, vs KO's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.3% vs KO's +17.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs DSX's 1.5%, ROIC 15.8% vs 3.1% |
PANL vs DSX vs KO vs SBLK vs GNK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PANL vs DSX vs KO vs SBLK vs GNK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories
DSX leads 1 • GNK leads 1 • PANL leads 0 • SBLK leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GNK is the larger business by revenue, generating $114.7B annually — 537.1x DSX's $214M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PANL's 5.1%. On growth, GNK holds the edge at +1604.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $680M | $214M | $49.3B | $1.1B | $114.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $90M | $82M | $15.5B | $365M | $112M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $35M | $18M | $13.7B | $142M | $9.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $56M | $0 | $12.6B | $260M | -$173M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | +40.5% | +61.7% | +34.5% | +62.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.7% | +18.9% | +29.3% | +18.3% | +0.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | +8.3% | +27.8% | +13.0% | +8.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | +20.8% | +25.5% | +23.8% | -0.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.9% | -8.8% | +12.1% | +21.9% | +1604.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.8% | -78.2% | +18.2% | — | +175.0% |
Valuation Metrics
DSX leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.7x trailing earnings, DSX trades at a 42% valuation discount to SBLK's 37.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SBLK offers better value at 0.76x vs PANL's 8.82x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $502M | $295M | $355.6B | $3.1B | $1.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $772M | $809M | $390.8B | $3.7B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.60x | 21.73x | 27.18x | 37.19x | -240.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.26x | 6.05x | 25.27x | 6.85x | 10.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 8.82x | — | 2.43x | 0.76x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.59x | 9.92x | 26.39x | 11.86x | 13.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.79x | 1.38x | 7.42x | 2.96x | 3.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.05x | 0.53x | 10.40x | 1.28x | 1.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.63x | 6.66x | 67.15x | 14.72x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $4 for DSX. GNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs GNK's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.3% | +3.6% | +41.1% | +5.9% | +4.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.7% | +1.5% | +13.1% | +3.8% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.7% | +3.1% | +15.8% | +3.2% | +0.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.7% | +3.6% | +17.3% | +4.0% | +0.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.78x | 1.27x | 1.33x | 0.44x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $269M | $514M | $35.2B | $572M | $145M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $103M | $122M | $10.3B | $500M | $56M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $372M | $636M | $45.5B | $1.1B | $200M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.14x | 1.42x | 10.70x | 3.26x | 0.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GNK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PANL five years ago would be worth $21,101 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,676 for DSX. Over the past 12 months, GNK leads with a +80.3% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GNK at 25.2% vs DSX's -6.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.5% | +43.5% | +20.3% | +44.7% | +35.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +65.5% | +51.6% | +17.2% | +65.7% | +80.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.5% | -17.3% | +47.0% | +75.1% | +96.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +111.0% | -13.2% | +65.6% | +89.5% | +72.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +250.6% | +90.0% | +121.1% | +1078.3% | +441.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.5% | -6.1% | +13.7% | +20.5% | +25.2% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DSX's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs PANL's 81.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.30x | 1.44x | -0.20x | 0.72x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.39 | $2.91 | $84.04 | $28.50 | $27.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.46 | $1.46 | $65.35 | $16.21 | $12.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.8% | +82.1% | +98.3% | +95.3% | +88.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.3 | 43.4 | 60.6 | 55.4 | 45.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 553K | 763K | 12.7M | 1.1M | 307K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PANL and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PANL as "Buy", DSX as "Hold", KO as "Buy", SBLK as "Buy", GNK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.5% upside for DSX (target: $3) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, PANL offers the higher dividend yield at 3.28% vs SBLK's 1.10%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.00 | $86.13 | $31.50 | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 27 | 48 | 24 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | +1.8% | +2.5% | +1.1% | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 56 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.25 | $0.04 | $2.04 | $0.30 | $0.76 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +7.8% | +0.2% | +3.2% | 0.0% |
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DSX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
PANL vs DSX vs KO vs SBLK vs GNK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PANL or DSX or KO or SBLK or GNK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd.
(PANL) is the stronger pick with 17. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 1% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK). Diana Shipping Inc. (DSX) offers the better valuation at 21. 7x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. (PANL) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PANL or DSX or KO or SBLK or GNK?
On trailing P/E, Diana Shipping Inc.
(DSX) is the cheapest at 21. 7x versus Star Bulk Carriers Corp. at 37. 2x. On forward P/E, Diana Shipping Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Star Bulk Carriers Corp. wins at 0. 14x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PANL or DSX or KO or SBLK or GNK?
Over the past 5 years, Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd.
(PANL) delivered a total return of +111. 0%, compared to -13. 2% for Diana Shipping Inc. (DSX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBLK returned +1078% versus DSX's +90. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PANL or DSX or KO or SBLK or GNK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Diana Shipping Inc. 's 1. 44β — meaning DSX is approximately -817% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PANL or DSX or KO or SBLK or GNK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd.
(PANL) is pulling ahead at 17. 8% versus -19. 1% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Diana Shipping Inc. grew EPS 87. 1% year-over-year, compared to -105. 7% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, KO leads at 3. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PANL or DSX or KO or SBLK or GNK?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -1. 3% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 2. 7% for GNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PANL or DSX or KO or SBLK or GNK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 14x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Diana Shipping Inc. (DSX) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 19. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DSX: 25. 5% to $3. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PANL or DSX or KO or SBLK or GNK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. (PANL) offers the highest yield at 3. 3%, versus 1. 1% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK).
09Is PANL or DSX or KO or SBLK or GNK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, DSX: +90. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PANL and DSX and KO and SBLK and GNK?
These companies operate in different sectors (PANL (Industrials) and DSX (Industrials) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and SBLK (Industrials) and GNK (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PANL is a small-cap high-growth stock; DSX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; SBLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GNK is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.