PANL
Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd.
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$502M
5Y Perf.+206.0%
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisPANL
NMM
Try popular comparisons:
Stock Comparison
PANL vs NMM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
NMM
Navios Maritime Partners L.P.
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$2.15B
5Y Perf.+675.4%
PANL vs NMM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot |  PANL |  NMM |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $502M | $2.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $680M | $1.40B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $35M | $347M |
| Gross Margin | 11.7% | 65.8% |
| Operating Margin | 6.7% | 31.6% |
| Forward P/E | 6.3x | 4.4x |
| Total Debt | $372M | $2.37B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $103M | $403M |
PANL vs NMM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
PANL
NMM
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pangaea Logistics S… (PANL) | 100 | 306.0 | +206.0% |
| Navios Maritime Par… (NMM) | 100 | 775.4 | +675.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PANL vs NMM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: NMM leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇NMM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
PANL
Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd.
The Income Pick
PANL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.30, yield 3.3%
- Rev growth 17.8%, EPS growth -52.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -3.3%
- Beta 1.30, yield 3.3%, current ratio 1.69x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
NMM
Navios Maritime Partners L.P.
The Long-Run Compounder
NMM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 312.7% 10Y total return vs PANL's 250.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.58, Low D/E 71.1%, current ratio 1.13x
- Lower P/E (4.4x vs 6.3x)
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth |  PANL | 17.8% revenue growth vs NMM's 0.8% |
| Value |  NMM | Lower P/E (4.4x vs 6.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | NMM | 24.9% margin vs PANL's 5.1% |
| Stability / Safety | NMM | Beta 0.58 vs PANL's 1.30, lower leverage |
| Dividends | PANL | 3.3% yield, vs NMM's 0.3% |
| Momentum (1Y) | NMM | +93.4% vs PANL's +65.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | NMM | 5.9% ROA vs PANL's 3.7%, ROIC 6.1% vs 3.7% |
PANL vs NMM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
Segment breakdown not available.
PANL vs NMM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLNMMLAGGINGPANL
PANLPangaea Logistics Sol…
1leads
NMMNavios Maritime Partn…
5leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs PANLMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
NMM4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
NMM4/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
NMM6/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
NMM6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
NMM2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
PANL1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NMM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NMM is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 2.1x PANL's $680M. NMM is the more profitable business, keeping 24.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PANL's 5.1%. On growth, PANL holds the edge at +38.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | PANLPangaea Logistics… | NMMNavios Maritime P… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $680M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $90M | $708M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $35M | $347M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $56M | $213M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | +65.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.7% | +31.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | +24.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | +15.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.9% | +17.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.8% | +163.8% |
NMM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
NMM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.9x trailing earnings, NMM trades at a 69% valuation discount to PANL's 25.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NMM's 5.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PANL's 9.6x.
| Metric | PANLPangaea Logistics… | NMMNavios Maritime P… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $502M | $2.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $772M | $4.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.60x | 7.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.26x | 4.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 8.82x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.59x | 5.57x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.79x | 1.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.05x | 0.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.63x | — |
NMM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NMM leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NMM delivers a 10.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $7 for PANL. NMM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.71x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PANL's 0.78x.
| Metric | PANLPangaea Logistics… | NMMNavios Maritime P… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.3% | +10.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.7% | +5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.7% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.7% | +7.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.78x | 0.71x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $269M | $2.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $103M | $403M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $372M | $2.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.14x | 3.34x |
NMM leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NMM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NMM five years ago would be worth $27,505 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $21,101 for PANL. Over the past 12 months, NMM leads with a +93.4% total return vs PANL's +65.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NMM at 54.3% vs PANL's 11.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PANLPangaea Logistics… | NMMNavios Maritime P… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.5% | +46.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +65.5% | +93.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.5% | +267.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +111.0% | +175.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +250.6% | +312.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.5% | +54.3% |
NMM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NMM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NMM is the less volatile stock with a 0.58 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PANL's 1.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NMM currently trades 93.3% from its 52-week high vs PANL's 81.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | PANLPangaea Logistics… | NMMNavios Maritime P… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.30x | 0.58x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.39 | $80.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.46 | $36.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.8% | +93.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.3 | 55.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 553K | 125K |
NMM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
PANL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PANL as "Buy" and NMM as "Hold". For income investors, PANL offers the higher dividend yield at 3.28% vs NMM's 0.27%.
| Metric | PANLPangaea Logistics… | NMMNavios Maritime P… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $85.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.25 | $0.20 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +2.0% |
PANL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
NMM leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PANL leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook).
Best OverallNavios Maritime Partners L.… (NMM)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
PANL vs NMM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PANL or NMM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd.
(PANL) is the stronger pick with 17. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 8% for Navios Maritime Partners L. P. (NMM). Navios Maritime Partners L. P. (NMM) offers the better valuation at 7. 9x trailing P/E (4. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. (PANL) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PANL or NMM?
On trailing P/E, Navios Maritime Partners L.
P. (NMM) is the cheapest at 7. 9x versus Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. at 25. 6x. On forward P/E, Navios Maritime Partners L. P. is actually cheaper at 4. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PANL or NMM?
Over the past 5 years, Navios Maritime Partners L.
P. (NMM) delivered a total return of +175. 1%, compared to +111. 0% for Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. (PANL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NMM returned +312. 7% versus PANL's +250. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PANL or NMM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Navios Maritime Partners L.
P. (NMM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 58β versus Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. 's 1. 30β — meaning PANL is approximately 125% more volatile than NMM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Navios Maritime Partners L. P. (NMM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 71% versus 78% for Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PANL or NMM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd.
(PANL) is pulling ahead at 17. 8% versus 0. 8% for Navios Maritime Partners L. P. (NMM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Navios Maritime Partners L. P. grew EPS -19. 9% year-over-year, compared to -52. 4% for Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NMM leads at 3. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PANL or NMM?
Navios Maritime Partners L.
P. (NMM) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 2% net margin versus 3. 1% for Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. — meaning it keeps 21. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NMM leads at 29. 1% versus 6. 0% for PANL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NMM leads at 64. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PANL or NMM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Navios Maritime Partners L.
P. (NMM) trades at 4. 4x forward P/E versus 6. 3x for Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. — 1. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — PANL or NMM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. (PANL) offers the highest yield at 3. 3%, versus 0. 3% for Navios Maritime Partners L. P. (NMM).
09Is PANL or NMM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Navios Maritime Partners L.
P. (NMM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 58), +312. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NMM: +312. 7%, PANL: +250. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PANL and NMM?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PANL is a small-cap high-growth stock; NMM is a small-cap deep-value stock. PANL pays a dividend while NMM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.