Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PKBK vs NFBK vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
PKBK vs NFBK vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $383M | $617M | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $146M | $266M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $38M | $796K | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 53.3% | 55.3% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 34.2% | 6.4% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 535.7x | 10.9x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $143M | $992M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $157M | $12M | $343.34B |
PKBK vs NFBK vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parke Bancorp, Inc. (PKBK) | 100 | 237.2 | +137.2% |
| Northfield Bancorp,… (NFBK) | 100 | 128.3 | +28.3% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PKBK vs NFBK vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PKBK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 2.2%
- Rev growth 12.9%, EPS growth 39.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.63, Low D/E 44.2%, current ratio 0.09x
NFBK is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.73, yield 3.6%, current ratio 0.36x
- Lower P/E (10.9x vs 535.7x)
- 3.6% yield, vs JPM's 1.9%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs PKBK's 286.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.9% NII/revenue growth vs NFBK's -26.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.9x vs 535.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs JPM's 0.3% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, vs JPM's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +67.1% vs JPM's +21.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs JPM's 0.3% |
PKBK vs NFBK vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PKBK vs NFBK vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PKBK and JPM each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 1919.0x PKBK's $146M. PKBK is the more profitable business, keeping 25.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NFBK's 0.3%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $146M | $266M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $50M | $25M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $38M | $796,000 | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $39M | $52M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.3% | +55.3% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +34.2% | +6.4% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.9% | +0.3% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.7% | +19.6% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +52.5% | +68.8% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PKBK leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.2x trailing earnings, PKBK trades at a 99% valuation discount to NFBK's 746.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs PKBK's 1.72x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $383M | $617M | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $370M | $1.6B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.17x | 746.46x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 535.67x | 10.95x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.72x | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.34x | 63.83x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.62x | 3.35x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.18x | 0.86x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.84x | 11.83x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PKBK leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $0 for NFBK. PKBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PKBK scores 8/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.0% | +0.1% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +0.0% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.8% | +0.8% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.6% | +1.0% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | 1.44x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$13M | $979M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $157M | $12M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $143M | $992M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.75x | 0.15x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,413 for NFBK. Over the past 12 months, PKBK leads with a +67.1% total return vs JPM's +21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs NFBK's 12.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.0% | +32.7% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +67.1% | +25.3% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +104.0% | +43.7% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.1% | +4.1% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +286.6% | +29.9% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.8% | +12.8% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PKBK and NFBK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PKBK is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NFBK currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs JPM's 95.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 0.73x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.24 | $14.80 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.78 | $9.90 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.7% | +99.9% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.0 | 67.0 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 90K | 245K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NFBK and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NFBK as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.9% upside for JPM (target: $340) vs -1.9% for NFBK (target: $15). For income investors, NFBK offers the higher dividend yield at 3.56% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.50 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +3.6% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.71 | $0.53 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +2.5% | +3.9% |
PKBK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
PKBK vs NFBK vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PKBK or NFBK or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Parke Bancorp, Inc.
(PKBK) is the stronger pick with 12. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -26. 7% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK). Parke Bancorp, Inc. (PKBK) offers the better valuation at 10. 2x trailing P/E (535. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PKBK or NFBK or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Parke Bancorp, Inc.
(PKBK) is the cheapest at 10. 2x versus Northfield Bancorp, Inc. at 746. 5x. On forward P/E, Northfield Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus Parke Bancorp, Inc. 's 90. 45x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PKBK or NFBK or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +4. 1% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus NFBK's +29. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PKBK or NFBK or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Parke Bancorp, Inc.
(PKBK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 51% more volatile than PKBK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Parke Bancorp, Inc. (PKBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PKBK or NFBK or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Parke Bancorp, Inc.
(PKBK) is pulling ahead at 12. 9% versus -26. 7% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Parke Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 39. 2% year-over-year, compared to -97. 3% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PKBK or NFBK or JPM?
Parke Bancorp, Inc.
(PKBK) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 9% net margin versus 0. 4% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PKBK leads at 34. 2% versus 9. 3% for NFBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PKBK or NFBK or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Parke Bancorp, Inc. 's 90. 45x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 535. 7x for Parke Bancorp, Inc. — 524. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JPM: 5. 9% to $339. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — PKBK or NFBK or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 1. 9% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
09Is PKBK or NFBK or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Parke Bancorp, Inc.
(PKBK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), 2. 2% yield, +286. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PKBK: +286. 6%, NFBK: +29. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PKBK and NFBK and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PKBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; NFBK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.