Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PLBC vs BANR vs COLB vs WAFD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
PLBC vs BANR vs COLB vs WAFD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $398M | $2.28B | $7.45B | $2.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $112M | $819M | $3.21B | $1.39B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $30M | $195M | $550M | $243M |
| Gross Margin | 81.5% | 79.0% | 67.7% | 52.8% |
| Operating Margin | 35.4% | 29.5% | 23.4% | 22.4% |
| Forward P/E | 10.1x | 10.9x | 10.2x | 11.4x |
| Total Debt | $148M | $373M | $4.01B | $1.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $81M | $183M | $511M | $657M |
PLBC vs BANR vs COLB vs WAFD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) | 100 | 255.9 | +155.9% |
| Banner Corporation (BANR) | 100 | 176.9 | +76.9% |
| Columbia Banking Sy… (COLB) | 100 | 110.4 | +10.4% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 138.1 | +38.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PLBC vs BANR vs COLB vs WAFD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PLBC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 48.6%, EPS growth -5.4%
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs BANR's 101.5%
- NIM 4.0% vs WAFD's 2.5%
- 48.6% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6%
BANR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.67, Low D/E 19.1%, current ratio 0.02x
- PEG 0.94 vs WAFD's 3.69
- Better valuation composite
COLB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends and momentum is your priority.
- 3.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs WAFD's 2.8%
- +40.2% vs BANR's +11.1%
WAFD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.8%
- Beta 0.66, yield 2.8%, current ratio 0.15x
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANR's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 0.66 vs COLB's 1.18
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 48.6% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANR's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs COLB's 1.18 | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs WAFD's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.2% vs BANR's +11.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANR's 0.5% |
PLBC vs BANR vs COLB vs WAFD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PLBC vs BANR vs COLB vs WAFD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PLBC leads in 3 of 6 categories
BANR leads 1 • WAFD leads 1 • COLB leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLBC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COLB is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 28.7x PLBC's $112M. PLBC is the more profitable business, keeping 26.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COLB's 17.1%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $112M | $819M | $3.2B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $41M | $253M | $895M | $277M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $30M | $195M | $550M | $243M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $20M | $248M | $724M | $215M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +81.5% | +79.0% | +67.7% | +52.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +35.4% | +29.5% | +23.4% | +22.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.4% | +23.8% | +17.1% | +17.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +30.3% | +22.5% | +15.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.9% | +11.2% | +5.9% | +46.3% |
Valuation Metrics
BANR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.9x trailing earnings, BANR trades at a 15% valuation discount to WAFD's 14.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BANR offers better value at 1.03x vs WAFD's 4.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $398M | $2.3B | $7.5B | $2.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $466M | $2.5B | $10.9B | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.47x | 11.92x | 13.61x | 14.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.06x | 10.92x | 10.24x | 11.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.20x | 1.03x | — | 4.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.76x | 9.77x | 12.23x | 13.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.68x | 2.78x | 2.32x | 2.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.41x | 1.19x | 1.19x | 0.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.64x | 9.19x | 10.56x | 13.71x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PLBC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PLBC delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $8 for WAFD. BANR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WAFD's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BANR scores 7/9 vs PLBC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.3% | +10.3% | +8.4% | +8.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | +1.2% | +0.9% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.2% | +7.7% | +5.4% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.1% | +10.1% | +2.0% | +5.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.57x | 0.19x | 0.51x | 0.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $67M | $190M | $3.5B | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $81M | $183M | $511M | $657M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $148M | $373M | $4.0B | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.85x | 1.11x | 0.82x | 0.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PLBC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PLBC five years ago would be worth $21,015 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,336 for COLB. Over the past 12 months, COLB leads with a +40.2% total return vs BANR's +11.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PLBC at 17.5% vs WAFD's 11.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.3% | +9.3% | +13.7% | +17.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +31.1% | +11.1% | +40.2% | +32.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.0% | +59.7% | +55.0% | +37.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.2% | +35.1% | -6.6% | +29.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +574.9% | +101.5% | +54.0% | +91.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.5% | +16.9% | +15.7% | +11.2% |
Risk & Volatility
WAFD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WAFD is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COLB's 1.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs COLB's 95.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | 0.67x | 1.18x | 0.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $57.00 | $69.83 | $32.70 | $37.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $39.70 | $57.05 | $21.91 | $26.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.3% | +96.3% | +95.7% | +99.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.4 | 60.0 | 63.4 | 63.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 56K | 218K | 2.5M | 525K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — COLB and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PLBC as "Buy", BANR as "Hold", COLB as "Buy", WAFD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 8.6% upside for PLBC (target: $62) vs -5.6% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, COLB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.61% vs PLBC's 2.09%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $61.50 | $64.25 | $32.90 | $35.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 13 | 19 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +2.9% | +3.6% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 1 | 5 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.18 | $1.96 | $1.13 | $1.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.5% | +1.5% | +3.6% |
PLBC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BANR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
PLBC vs BANR vs COLB vs WAFD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PLBC or BANR or COLB or WAFD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is the stronger pick with 48.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). Banner Corporation (BANR) offers the better valuation at 11. 9x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PLBC or BANR or COLB or WAFD?
On trailing P/E, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the cheapest at 11.
9x versus WaFd, Inc. at 14. 1x. On forward P/E, Plumas Bancorp is actually cheaper at 10. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Banner Corporation wins at 0. 94x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 69x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PLBC or BANR or COLB or WAFD?
Over the past 5 years, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) delivered a total return of +110.
2%, compared to -6. 6% for Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLBC returned +574. 9% versus COLB's +54. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PLBC or BANR or COLB or WAFD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus Columbia Banking System, Inc. 's 1. 18β — meaning COLB is approximately 78% more volatile than WAFD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Banner Corporation (BANR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 60% for WaFd, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PLBC or BANR or COLB or WAFD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is pulling ahead at 48.
6% versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Banner Corporation grew EPS 15. 6% year-over-year, compared to -9. 8% for Columbia Banking System, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PLBC or BANR or COLB or WAFD?
Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
4% net margin versus 16. 0% for WaFd, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLBC leads at 36. 6% versus 20. 5% for WAFD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLBC leads at 80. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PLBC or BANR or COLB or WAFD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 94x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 69x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) trades at 10. 1x forward P/E versus 11. 4x for WaFd, Inc. — 1. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLBC: 8. 6% to $61. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PLBC or BANR or COLB or WAFD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 2. 1% for Plumas Bancorp (PLBC).
09Is PLBC or BANR or COLB or WAFD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
71), 2. 1% yield, +574. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PLBC: +574. 9%, COLB: +54. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PLBC and BANR and COLB and WAFD?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PLBC is a small-cap high-growth stock; BANR is a small-cap deep-value stock; COLB is a small-cap deep-value stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.