Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PLBC vs BANR vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
PLBC vs BANR vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $398M | $2.28B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $112M | $819M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $30M | $195M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 81.5% | 79.0% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 35.4% | 29.5% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 10.1x | 10.9x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $148M | $373M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $81M | $183M | $343.34B |
PLBC vs BANR vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) | 100 | 255.9 | +155.9% |
| Banner Corporation (BANR) | 100 | 176.9 | +76.9% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PLBC vs BANR vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PLBC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 48.6%, EPS growth -5.4%
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
- NIM 4.0% vs JPM's 2.2%
BANR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 2.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.67, Low D/E 19.1%, current ratio 0.02x
- Beta 0.67, yield 2.9%, current ratio 0.02x
JPM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.81 vs PLBC's 0.97
- PEG 0.81 vs 0.94
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANR's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 48.6% NII/revenue growth vs BANR's -0.9% | |
| Value | PEG 0.81 vs 0.94 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANR's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.1% vs BANR's +11.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANR's 0.5% |
PLBC vs BANR vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PLBC vs BANR vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLBC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 2503.2x PLBC's $112M. PLBC is the more profitable business, keeping 26.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JPM's 20.4%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $112M | $819M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $41M | $253M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $30M | $195M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $20M | $248M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +81.5% | +79.0% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +35.4% | +29.5% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.4% | +23.8% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +30.3% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.9% | +11.2% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BANR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.9x trailing earnings, BANR trades at a 25% valuation discount to JPM's 16.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs PLBC's 1.20x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $398M | $2.3B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $466M | $2.5B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.47x | 11.92x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.06x | 10.92x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.20x | 1.03x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.76x | 9.77x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.68x | 2.78x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.41x | 1.19x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.64x | 9.19x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PLBC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $10 for BANR. BANR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BANR scores 7/9 vs PLBC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.3% | +10.3% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | +1.2% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.2% | +7.7% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.1% | +10.1% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.57x | 0.19x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $67M | $190M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $81M | $183M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $148M | $373M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.85x | 1.11x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — PLBC and JPM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,506 for BANR. Over the past 12 months, PLBC leads with a +31.1% total return vs BANR's +11.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs BANR's 16.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.3% | +9.3% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +31.1% | +11.1% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.0% | +59.7% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.2% | +35.1% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +574.9% | +101.5% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.5% | +16.9% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PLBC and BANR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BANR is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PLBC currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs JPM's 95.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | 0.67x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $57.00 | $69.83 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $39.70 | $57.05 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.3% | +96.3% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.4 | 60.0 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 56K | 218K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BANR and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PLBC as "Buy", BANR as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.6% upside for PLBC (target: $62) vs -4.4% for BANR (target: $64). For income investors, BANR offers the higher dividend yield at 2.92% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $61.50 | $64.25 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 13 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +2.9% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 1 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.18 | $1.96 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.5% | +3.9% |
PLBC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BANR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
PLBC vs BANR vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PLBC or BANR or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is the stronger pick with 48.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Banner Corporation (BANR). Banner Corporation (BANR) offers the better valuation at 11. 9x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PLBC or BANR or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the cheapest at 11.
9x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 16. 0x. On forward P/E, Plumas Bancorp is actually cheaper at 10. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus Plumas Bancorp's 0. 97x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PLBC or BANR or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +35. 1% for Banner Corporation (BANR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLBC returned +574. 9% versus BANR's +101. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PLBC or BANR or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Banner Corporation (BANR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
67β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 41% more volatile than BANR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Banner Corporation (BANR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PLBC or BANR or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is pulling ahead at 48.
6% versus -0. 9% for Banner Corporation (BANR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Banner Corporation grew EPS 15. 6% year-over-year, compared to -5. 4% for Plumas Bancorp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PLBC or BANR or JPM?
Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
4% net margin versus 20. 4% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — meaning it keeps 27. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLBC leads at 36. 6% versus 26. 0% for JPM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLBC leads at 80. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PLBC or BANR or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Plumas Bancorp's 0. 97x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) trades at 10. 1x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 4. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLBC: 8. 6% to $61. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PLBC or BANR or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Banner Corporation (BANR) offers the highest yield at 2. 9%, versus 1. 9% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
09Is PLBC or BANR or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
71), 2. 1% yield, +574. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PLBC: +574. 9%, JPM: +465. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PLBC and BANR and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PLBC is a small-cap high-growth stock; BANR is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.