Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PLBC vs CVBF vs JPM vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
PLBC vs CVBF vs JPM vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $398M | $2.88B | $896.00B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $112M | $644M | $280.33B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $30M | $209M | $57.05B | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 81.5% | 79.7% | 60.0% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 35.4% | 43.7% | 25.9% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 10.1x | 14.7x | 14.4x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $148M | $991M | $942.38B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $81M | $108M | $343.34B | $10.27B |
PLBC vs CVBF vs JPM vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) | 100 | 255.9 | +155.9% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 113.3 | +13.3% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PLBC vs CVBF vs JPM vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PLBC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 48.6%, EPS growth -5.4%
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 56.6%, current ratio 0.25x
- Beta 0.71, yield 2.1%, current ratio 0.25x
CVBF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 3.8%
- 32.5% margin vs JPM's 20.4%
- 3.8% yield, vs KO's 2.5%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.81 vs CVBF's 4.64
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 13.1% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs 4.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 48.6% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.5% margin vs JPM's 20.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, vs KO's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.1% vs CVBF's +16.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs 4.5% |
PLBC vs CVBF vs JPM vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PLBC vs CVBF vs JPM vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 1 of 6 categories
PLBC leads 0 • CVBF leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • 5 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PLBC and CVBF each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 2503.2x PLBC's $112M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JPM's 20.4%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $112M | $644M | $280.3B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $41M | $294M | $81.4B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $30M | $209M | $57.0B | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $20M | $217M | $100.9B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +81.5% | +79.7% | +60.0% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +35.4% | +43.7% | +25.9% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.4% | +32.5% | +20.4% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +33.7% | +36.0% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.9% | +11.1% | +16.0% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PLBC and JPM each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.5x trailing earnings, PLBC trades at a 54% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs CVBF's 4.40x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $398M | $2.9B | $896.0B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $466M | $3.8B | $1.50T | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.47x | 13.97x | 16.00x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.06x | 14.74x | 14.40x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.20x | 4.40x | 0.90x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.76x | 13.37x | 18.36x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.68x | 4.48x | 3.20x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.41x | 1.26x | 2.47x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.64x | 13.26x | 8.88x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $9 for CVBF. CVBF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.43x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs PLBC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.3% | +9.3% | +15.9% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | +1.4% | +1.3% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.2% | +6.8% | +4.5% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.1% | +9.3% | +8.9% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.57x | 0.43x | 2.60x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $67M | $883M | $599.0B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $81M | $108M | $343.3B | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $148M | $991M | $942.4B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.85x | 2.12x | 0.74x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — PLBC and JPM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,522 for CVBF. Over the past 12 months, PLBC leads with a +31.1% total return vs CVBF's +16.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.3% | +14.8% | -0.5% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +31.1% | +16.3% | +21.8% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.0% | +64.4% | +138.2% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.2% | +15.2% | +118.2% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +574.9% | +66.9% | +465.8% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.5% | +18.0% | +33.6% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PLBC and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PLBC currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs JPM's 95.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | 0.81x | 0.94x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $57.00 | $21.48 | $337.25 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $39.70 | $17.95 | $262.71 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.3% | +98.8% | +95.1% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.4 | 60.1 | 59.1 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 56K | 1.6M | 7.0M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CVBF and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PLBC as "Buy", CVBF as "Hold", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.6% upside for CVBF (target: $25) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.85% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $61.50 | $24.75 | $339.75 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 16 | 61 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +3.8% | +1.9% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 0 | 15 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.18 | $0.82 | $5.95 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.8% | +3.9% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency. 5 categories are tied.
PLBC vs CVBF vs JPM vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PLBC or CVBF or JPM or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is the stronger pick with 48.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) offers the better valuation at 12. 5x trailing P/E (10. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PLBC or CVBF or JPM or KO?
On trailing P/E, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is the cheapest at 12.
5x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Plumas Bancorp is actually cheaper at 10. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PLBC or CVBF or JPM or KO?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +15. 2% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLBC returned +574. 9% versus CVBF's +66. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PLBC or CVBF or JPM or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately -571% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 43% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PLBC or CVBF or JPM or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is pulling ahead at 48.
6% versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -5. 4% for Plumas Bancorp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PLBC or CVBF or JPM or KO?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 20. 4% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 26. 0% for JPM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLBC leads at 80. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PLBC or CVBF or JPM or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) trades at 10. 1x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 15. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVBF: 16. 6% to $24. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — PLBC or CVBF or JPM or KO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 1. 9% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
09Is PLBC or CVBF or JPM or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, CVBF: +66. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PLBC and CVBF and JPM and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (PLBC (Financial Services) and CVBF (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PLBC is a small-cap high-growth stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.