Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
PLBC logo
PLBC
CVBF logo
CVBF
KO logo
KO
WAFD logo
WAFD
BANR logo
BANR
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PLBC vs CVBF vs KO vs WAFD vs BANR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PLBC
Plumas Bancorp

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$398M
5Y Perf.+155.9%
CVBF
CVB Financial Corp.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.88B
5Y Perf.+13.3%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%
WAFD
WaFd, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.85B
5Y Perf.+38.1%
BANR
Banner Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.28B
5Y Perf.+76.9%

PLBC vs CVBF vs KO vs WAFD vs BANR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PLBC logoPLBC
CVBF logoCVBF
KO logoKO
WAFD logoWAFD
BANR logoBANR
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$398M$2.88B$355.61B$2.85B$2.28B
Revenue (TTM)$112M$644M$49.28B$1.39B$819M
Net Income (TTM)$30M$209M$13.70B$243M$195M
Gross Margin81.5%79.7%61.7%52.8%79.0%
Operating Margin35.4%43.7%29.3%22.4%29.5%
Forward P/E10.1x14.7x25.3x11.4x10.9x
Total Debt$148M$991M$45.49B$1.82B$373M
Cash & Equiv.$81M$108M$10.27B$657M$183M

PLBC vs CVBF vs KO vs WAFD vs BANRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PLBC
CVBF
KO
WAFD
BANR
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Plumas Bancorp (PLBC)100255.9+155.9%
CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF)100113.3+13.3%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%
WaFd, Inc. (WAFD)100138.1+38.1%
Banner Corporation (BANR)100176.9+76.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PLBC vs CVBF vs KO vs WAFD vs BANR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CVBF and WAFD are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. WaFd, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. PLBC, KO, and BANR also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
PLBC
Plumas Bancorp
The Banking Pick

PLBC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and bank quality.

  • 5.7% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
  • NIM 4.0% vs WAFD's 2.5%
  • 48.6% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3%
Best for: long-term compounding and bank quality
CVBF
CVB Financial Corp.
The Banking Pick

CVBF has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and dividends.

  • 32.5% margin vs WAFD's 17.5%
  • 3.8% yield, vs KO's 2.5%
Best for: quality and dividends
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Growth Play

KO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 1.9%, EPS growth 23.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
  • 13.1% ROA vs WAFD's 0.9%, ROIC 15.8% vs 3.9%
Best for: growth exposure
WAFD
WaFd, Inc.
The Banking Pick

WAFD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 59.8%, current ratio 0.15x
  • Beta 0.66, yield 2.8%, current ratio 0.15x
  • Beta 0.66 vs CVBF's 0.81
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
BANR
Banner Corporation
The Banking Pick

BANR is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.94 vs CVBF's 4.64
  • Lower P/E (10.9x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.94 vs 2.26
Best for: valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPLBC logoPLBC48.6% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3%
ValueBANR logoBANRLower P/E (10.9x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.94 vs 2.26
Quality / MarginsCVBF logoCVBF32.5% margin vs WAFD's 17.5%
Stability / SafetyWAFD logoWAFDBeta 0.66 vs CVBF's 0.81
DividendsCVBF logoCVBF3.8% yield, vs KO's 2.5%
Momentum (1Y)WAFD logoWAFD+32.5% vs BANR's +11.1%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs WAFD's 0.9%, ROIC 15.8% vs 3.9%

PLBC vs CVBF vs KO vs WAFD vs BANR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PLBCPlumas Bancorp
FY 2025
Service
83.0%$3M
Bank Servicing
17.0%$641,000
CVBFCVB Financial Corp.
FY 2025
Deposit Account
52.3%$19M
Fiduciary and Trust
40.4%$15M
Credit Card
7.3%$3M
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
WAFDWaFd, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

BANRBanner Corporation
FY 2025
Deposit Account
65.3%$25M
Credit Card, Merchant Discount
34.7%$14M

PLBC vs CVBF vs KO vs WAFD vs BANR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPLBCLAGGINGWAFD

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CVBF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 440.1x PLBC's $112M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WAFD's 17.5%.

MetricPLBC logoPLBCPlumas BancorpCVBF logoCVBFCVB Financial Cor…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.BANR logoBANRBanner Corporation
RevenueTrailing 12 months$112M$644M$49.3B$1.4B$819M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$41M$294M$15.5B$277M$253M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$30M$209M$13.7B$243M$195M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$20M$217M$12.6B$215M$248M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+81.5%+79.7%+61.7%+52.8%+79.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+35.4%+43.7%+29.3%+22.4%+29.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+26.4%+32.5%+27.8%+17.5%+23.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+18.1%+33.7%+25.5%+15.5%+30.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+20.9%+11.1%+18.2%+46.3%+11.2%
CVBF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BANR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 11.9x trailing earnings, BANR trades at a 56% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BANR offers better value at 1.03x vs WAFD's 4.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricPLBC logoPLBCPlumas BancorpCVBF logoCVBFCVB Financial Cor…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.BANR logoBANRBanner Corporation
Market CapShares × price$398M$2.9B$355.6B$2.9B$2.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$466M$3.8B$390.8B$4.0B$2.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.47x13.97x27.18x14.10x11.92x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.06x14.74x25.27x11.35x10.92x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.20x4.40x2.43x4.58x1.03x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.76x13.37x26.39x13.41x9.77x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.68x4.48x7.42x2.02x2.78x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.41x1.26x10.40x0.98x1.19x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF19.64x13.26x67.15x13.71x9.19x
BANR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $8 for WAFD. BANR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs PLBC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPLBC logoPLBCPlumas BancorpCVBF logoCVBFCVB Financial Cor…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.BANR logoBANRBanner Corporation
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+13.3%+9.3%+41.1%+8.0%+10.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.5%+1.4%+13.1%+0.9%+1.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.2%+6.8%+15.8%+3.9%+7.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+14.1%+9.3%+17.3%+5.7%+10.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–936777
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.57x0.43x1.33x0.60x0.19x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$67M$883M$35.2B$1.2B$190M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$81M$108M$10.3B$657M$183M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$148M$991M$45.5B$1.8B$373M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.85x2.12x10.70x0.48x1.11x
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PLBC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PLBC five years ago would be worth $21,015 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,522 for CVBF. Over the past 12 months, WAFD leads with a +32.5% total return vs BANR's +11.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CVBF at 18.0% vs WAFD's 11.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPLBC logoPLBCPlumas BancorpCVBF logoCVBFCVB Financial Cor…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.BANR logoBANRBanner Corporation
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+30.3%+14.8%+20.3%+17.1%+9.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+31.1%+16.3%+17.2%+32.5%+11.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+62.0%+64.4%+47.0%+37.6%+59.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+110.2%+15.2%+65.6%+29.5%+35.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+574.9%+66.9%+121.1%+91.9%+101.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+17.5%+18.0%+13.7%+11.2%+16.9%
PLBC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — KO and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CVBF's 0.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs BANR's 96.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPLBC logoPLBCPlumas BancorpCVBF logoCVBFCVB Financial Cor…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.BANR logoBANRBanner Corporation
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.71x0.81x-0.20x0.66x0.67x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$57.00$21.48$84.04$37.10$69.83
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$39.70$17.95$65.35$26.31$57.05
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.3%+98.8%+98.3%+99.9%+96.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10070.460.160.663.860.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded56K1.6M12.7M525K218K
Evenly matched — KO and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — CVBF and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: PLBC as "Buy", CVBF as "Hold", KO as "Buy", WAFD as "Hold", BANR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.6% upside for CVBF (target: $25) vs -5.6% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.85% vs PLBC's 2.09%.

MetricPLBC logoPLBCPlumas BancorpCVBF logoCVBFCVB Financial Cor…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.BANR logoBANRBanner Corporation
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$61.50$24.75$86.13$35.00$64.25
# AnalystsCovering analysts316481113
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.1%+3.8%+2.5%+2.8%+2.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises5056161
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.18$0.82$2.04$1.05$1.96
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.8%+0.2%+3.6%+1.5%
Evenly matched — CVBF and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CVBF leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). BANR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallPlumas Bancorp (PLBC)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PLBC vs CVBF vs KO vs WAFD vs BANR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PLBC or CVBF or KO or WAFD or BANR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is the stronger pick with 48.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). Banner Corporation (BANR) offers the better valuation at 11. 9x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PLBC or CVBF or KO or WAFD or BANR?

On trailing P/E, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the cheapest at 11.

9x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Plumas Bancorp is actually cheaper at 10. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Banner Corporation wins at 0. 94x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PLBC or CVBF or KO or WAFD or BANR?

Over the past 5 years, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) delivered a total return of +110.

2%, compared to +15. 2% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLBC returned +574. 9% versus CVBF's +66. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PLBC or CVBF or KO or WAFD or BANR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 0. 81β — meaning CVBF is approximately -507% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Banner Corporation (BANR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PLBC or CVBF or KO or WAFD or BANR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is pulling ahead at 48.

6% versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -5. 4% for Plumas Bancorp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PLBC or CVBF or KO or WAFD or BANR?

CVB Financial Corp.

(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 16. 0% for WaFd, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 20. 5% for WAFD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLBC leads at 80. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PLBC or CVBF or KO or WAFD or BANR more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 94x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) trades at 10. 1x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 15. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVBF: 16. 6% to $24. 75.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PLBC or CVBF or KO or WAFD or BANR?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 2. 1% for Plumas Bancorp (PLBC).

09

Is PLBC or CVBF or KO or WAFD or BANR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, CVBF: +66. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PLBC and CVBF and KO and WAFD and BANR?

These companies operate in different sectors (PLBC (Financial Services) and CVBF (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and WAFD (Financial Services) and BANR (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: PLBC is a small-cap high-growth stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock; BANR is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.