Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
PLBC logo
PLBC
WAFD logo
WAFD
COLB logo
COLB
BANR logo
BANR
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PLBC vs WAFD vs COLB vs BANR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PLBC
Plumas Bancorp

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$398M
5Y Perf.+155.9%
WAFD
WaFd, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.85B
5Y Perf.+38.1%
COLB
Columbia Banking System, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.45B
5Y Perf.+10.4%
BANR
Banner Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.28B
5Y Perf.+76.9%

PLBC vs WAFD vs COLB vs BANR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PLBC logoPLBC
WAFD logoWAFD
COLB logoCOLB
BANR logoBANR
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$398M$2.85B$7.45B$2.28B
Revenue (TTM)$112M$1.39B$3.21B$819M
Net Income (TTM)$30M$243M$550M$195M
Gross Margin81.5%52.8%67.7%79.0%
Operating Margin35.4%22.4%23.4%29.5%
Forward P/E10.1x11.4x10.2x10.9x
Total Debt$148M$1.82B$4.01B$373M
Cash & Equiv.$81M$657M$511M$183M

PLBC vs WAFD vs COLB vs BANRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PLBC
WAFD
COLB
BANR
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Plumas Bancorp (PLBC)100255.9+155.9%
WaFd, Inc. (WAFD)100138.1+38.1%
Columbia Banking Sy… (COLB)100110.4+10.4%
Banner Corporation (BANR)100176.9+76.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PLBC vs WAFD vs COLB vs BANR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: WAFD leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Columbia Banking System, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. PLBC and BANR also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇WAFD emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
PLBC
Plumas Bancorp
The Banking Pick

PLBC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 48.6%, EPS growth -5.4%
  • 5.7% 10Y total return vs BANR's 101.5%
  • NIM 4.0% vs WAFD's 2.5%
  • 48.6% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
WAFD
WaFd, Inc.
The Banking Pick

WAFD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 59.8%, current ratio 0.15x
  • Beta 0.66, yield 2.8%, current ratio 0.15x
  • Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANR's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
COLB
Columbia Banking System, Inc.
The Banking Pick

COLB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends and momentum is your priority.

  • 3.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs WAFD's 2.8%
  • +40.2% vs BANR's +11.1%
Best for: dividends and momentum
BANR
Banner Corporation
The Banking Pick

BANR is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.94 vs WAFD's 3.69
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPLBC logoPLBC48.6% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6%
ValueBANR logoBANRBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsWAFD logoWAFDEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANR's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyWAFD logoWAFDBeta 0.66 vs COLB's 1.18
DividendsCOLB logoCOLB3.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs WAFD's 2.8%
Momentum (1Y)COLB logoCOLB+40.2% vs BANR's +11.1%
Efficiency (ROA)WAFD logoWAFDEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANR's 0.5%

PLBC vs WAFD vs COLB vs BANR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PLBCPlumas Bancorp
FY 2025
Service
83.0%$3M
Bank Servicing
17.0%$641,000
WAFDWaFd, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

COLBColumbia Banking System, Inc.
FY 2025
Total Service Charges on Deposits
32.2%$84M
Card-based Fees
22.2%$58M
Account Service Fees
21.8%$57M
Investment Advisory, Management and Administrative Service
13.4%$35M
Transaction-based and overdraft service charges
10.3%$27M
BANRBanner Corporation
FY 2025
Deposit Account
65.3%$25M
Credit Card, Merchant Discount
34.7%$14M

PLBC vs WAFD vs COLB vs BANR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPLBCLAGGINGCOLB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

PLBC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

COLB is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 28.7x PLBC's $112M. PLBC is the more profitable business, keeping 26.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COLB's 17.1%.

MetricPLBC logoPLBCPlumas BancorpWAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.COLB logoCOLBColumbia Banking …BANR logoBANRBanner Corporation
RevenueTrailing 12 months$112M$1.4B$3.2B$819M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$41M$277M$895M$253M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$30M$243M$550M$195M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$20M$215M$724M$248M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+81.5%+52.8%+67.7%+79.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+35.4%+22.4%+23.4%+29.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+26.4%+17.5%+17.1%+23.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+18.1%+15.5%+22.5%+30.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+20.9%+46.3%+5.9%+11.2%
PLBC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BANR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 11.9x trailing earnings, BANR trades at a 15% valuation discount to WAFD's 14.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BANR offers better value at 1.03x vs WAFD's 4.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricPLBC logoPLBCPlumas BancorpWAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.COLB logoCOLBColumbia Banking …BANR logoBANRBanner Corporation
Market CapShares × price$398M$2.9B$7.5B$2.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$466M$4.0B$10.9B$2.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.47x14.10x13.61x11.92x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.06x11.35x10.24x10.92x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.20x4.58x1.03x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.76x13.41x12.23x9.77x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.68x2.02x2.32x2.78x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.41x0.98x1.19x1.19x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF19.64x13.71x10.56x9.19x
BANR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

PLBC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

PLBC delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $8 for WAFD. BANR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WAFD's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WAFD scores 7/9 vs PLBC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPLBC logoPLBCPlumas BancorpWAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.COLB logoCOLBColumbia Banking …BANR logoBANRBanner Corporation
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+13.3%+8.0%+8.4%+10.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.5%+0.9%+0.9%+1.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.2%+3.9%+5.4%+7.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+14.1%+5.7%+2.0%+10.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93767
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.57x0.60x0.51x0.19x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$67M$1.2B$3.5B$190M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$81M$657M$511M$183M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$148M$1.8B$4.0B$373M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.85x0.48x0.82x1.11x
PLBC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PLBC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PLBC five years ago would be worth $21,015 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,336 for COLB. Over the past 12 months, COLB leads with a +40.2% total return vs BANR's +11.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PLBC at 17.5% vs WAFD's 11.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPLBC logoPLBCPlumas BancorpWAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.COLB logoCOLBColumbia Banking …BANR logoBANRBanner Corporation
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+30.3%+17.1%+13.7%+9.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+31.1%+32.5%+40.2%+11.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+62.0%+37.6%+55.0%+59.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+110.2%+29.5%-6.6%+35.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+574.9%+91.9%+54.0%+101.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+17.5%+11.2%+15.7%+16.9%
PLBC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

WAFD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

WAFD is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COLB's 1.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs COLB's 95.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPLBC logoPLBCPlumas BancorpWAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.COLB logoCOLBColumbia Banking …BANR logoBANRBanner Corporation
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.71x0.66x1.18x0.67x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$57.00$37.10$32.70$69.83
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$39.70$26.31$21.91$57.05
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.3%+99.9%+95.7%+96.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10070.463.863.460.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded56K525K2.5M218K
WAFD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — WAFD and COLB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: PLBC as "Buy", WAFD as "Hold", COLB as "Buy", BANR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 8.6% upside for PLBC (target: $62) vs -5.6% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, COLB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.61% vs PLBC's 2.09%.

MetricPLBC logoPLBCPlumas BancorpWAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.COLB logoCOLBColumbia Banking …BANR logoBANRBanner Corporation
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$61.50$35.00$32.90$64.25
# AnalystsCovering analysts3111913
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.1%+2.8%+3.6%+2.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises51651
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.18$1.05$1.13$1.96
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.6%+1.5%+1.5%
Evenly matched — WAFD and COLB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

PLBC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BANR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallPlumas Bancorp (PLBC)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PLBC vs WAFD vs COLB vs BANR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PLBC or WAFD or COLB or BANR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is the stronger pick with 48.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). Banner Corporation (BANR) offers the better valuation at 11. 9x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PLBC or WAFD or COLB or BANR?

On trailing P/E, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the cheapest at 11.

9x versus WaFd, Inc. at 14. 1x. On forward P/E, Plumas Bancorp is actually cheaper at 10. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Banner Corporation wins at 0. 94x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 69x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PLBC or WAFD or COLB or BANR?

Over the past 5 years, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) delivered a total return of +110.

2%, compared to -6. 6% for Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLBC returned +574. 9% versus COLB's +54. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PLBC or WAFD or COLB or BANR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), WaFd, Inc.

(WAFD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus Columbia Banking System, Inc. 's 1. 18β — meaning COLB is approximately 78% more volatile than WAFD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Banner Corporation (BANR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 60% for WaFd, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PLBC or WAFD or COLB or BANR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is pulling ahead at 48.

6% versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Banner Corporation grew EPS 15. 6% year-over-year, compared to -9. 8% for Columbia Banking System, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PLBC or WAFD or COLB or BANR?

Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

4% net margin versus 16. 0% for WaFd, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLBC leads at 36. 6% versus 20. 5% for WAFD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLBC leads at 80. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PLBC or WAFD or COLB or BANR more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 94x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 69x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) trades at 10. 1x forward P/E versus 11. 4x for WaFd, Inc. — 1. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLBC: 8. 6% to $61. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PLBC or WAFD or COLB or BANR?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 2. 1% for Plumas Bancorp (PLBC).

09

Is PLBC or WAFD or COLB or BANR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

71), 2. 1% yield, +574. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PLBC: +574. 9%, COLB: +54. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PLBC and WAFD and COLB and BANR?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PLBC is a small-cap high-growth stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock; COLB is a small-cap deep-value stock; BANR is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.