Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PMN vs SAVA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
PMN vs SAVA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $68M | $64M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-41M | $-106M |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $129M |
PMN vs SAVA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ProMIS Neuroscience… (PMN) | 100 | 4.3 | -95.7% |
| Cassava Sciences, I… (SAVA) | 100 | 518.2 | +418.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PMN vs SAVA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PMN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.11
- Lower volatility, beta 1.11, current ratio 0.88x
- Beta 1.11, current ratio 0.88x
SAVA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- EPS growth 77.6%
- -38.0% 10Y total return vs PMN's -91.4%
- -75.3% ROA vs PMN's -151.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.11 vs SAVA's 1.92 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -20.4% vs SAVA's -37.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -75.3% ROA vs PMN's -151.0% |
PMN vs SAVA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PMN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PMN and SAVA operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$41M | -$110M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$41M | -$106M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$35M | -$84M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +76.0% | +62.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SAVA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $68M | $64M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $61M | -$65M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.46x | -2.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SAVA leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SAVA delivers a -95.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-96 in annual profit, vs $-2 for PMN. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SAVA scores 2/9 vs PMN's 0/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.4% | -95.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -151.0% | -75.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.2% | -99.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 0 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6M | -$129M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $129M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SAVA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SAVA five years ago would be worth $1,219 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $363 for PMN. Over the past 12 months, PMN leads with a -20.4% total return vs SAVA's -37.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SAVA at -27.9% vs PMN's -56.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +45.0% | -36.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -20.4% | -37.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.5% | -62.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.4% | -87.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.4% | -38.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -56.0% | -27.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PMN and SAVA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PMN is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SAVA's 1.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.11x | 1.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.75 | $4.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.27 | $1.27 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +26.0% | +26.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.8 | 42.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 34K | 134K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PMN as "Buy" and SAVA as "Buy".
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SAVA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). PMN leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
PMN vs SAVA: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PMN or SAVA a better buy right now?
Analysts rate ProMIS Neurosciences, Inc.
(PMN) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PMN or SAVA?
Over the past 5 years, Cassava Sciences, Inc.
(SAVA) delivered a total return of -87. 8%, compared to -96. 4% for ProMIS Neurosciences, Inc. (PMN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SAVA returned -38. 0% versus PMN's -91. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PMN or SAVA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ProMIS Neurosciences, Inc.
(PMN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 11β versus Cassava Sciences, Inc. 's 1. 92β — meaning SAVA is approximately 74% more volatile than PMN relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — PMN or SAVA?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cassava Sciences, Inc.
grew EPS 77. 6% year-over-year, compared to -922. 2% for ProMIS Neurosciences, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PMN or SAVA?
ProMIS Neurosciences, Inc.
(PMN) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Cassava Sciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PMN leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for SAVA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PMN leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — PMN or SAVA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is PMN or SAVA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ProMIS Neurosciences, Inc.
(PMN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 11)). Cassava Sciences, Inc. (SAVA) carries a higher beta of 1. 92 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PMN: -91. 4%, SAVA: -38. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between PMN and SAVA?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.