Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
PRM logo
PRM
ALB logo
ALB
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PRM vs ALB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PRM
Perimeter Solutions, S.A.

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.79B
5Y Perf.+201.9%
ALB
Albemarle Corporation

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.10B
5Y Perf.-36.1%

PRM vs ALB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PRM logoPRM
ALB logoALB
IndustryChemicals - SpecialtyChemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$5.79B$20.10B
Revenue (TTM)$706M$5.49B
Net Income (TTM)$-190M$-233M
Gross Margin56.4%18.5%
Operating Margin-20.5%5.6%
Forward P/E20.3x14.0x
Total Debt$34M$3.30B
Cash & Equiv.$326M$1.62B

PRM vs ALBLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PRM
ALB
StockNov 21Jun 26Return
Perimeter Solutions… (PRM)100301.9+201.9%
Albemarle Corporati… (ALB)10063.9-36.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PRM vs ALB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ALB leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Perimeter Solutions, S.A. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇ALB emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
PRM
Perimeter Solutions, S.A.
The Income Pick

PRM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.09
  • Rev growth 16.4%, EPS growth -32.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.9%
  • 195.6% 10Y total return vs ALB's 137.7%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
The Value Play

ALB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (14.0x vs 20.3x)
  • -4.2% margin vs PRM's -26.9%
  • 0.9% yield; 32-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: value and quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPRM logoPRM16.4% revenue growth vs ALB's -4.4%
ValueALB logoALBLower P/E (14.0x vs 20.3x)
Quality / MarginsALB logoALB-4.2% margin vs PRM's -26.9%
Stability / SafetyPRM logoPRMBeta 1.09 vs ALB's 1.69, lower leverage
DividendsALB logoALB0.9% yield; 32-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ALB logoALB+176.0% vs PRM's +164.1%
Efficiency (ROA)ALB logoALB-1.4% ROA vs PRM's -6.9%, ROIC 0.6% vs -11.6%

PRM vs ALB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Battery Storage Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Battery Storage Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
PRMPerimeter Solutions, S.A.
FY 2025
Product
83.4%$544M
Service
16.6%$108M
Product and Service, Other
0.0%$145,000
ALBAlbemarle Corporation
FY 2025
Energy Storage
52.7%$2.7B
Specialties
26.6%$1.4B
Ketjen
20.7%$1.1B

PRM vs ALB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPRMLAGGINGALB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

PRM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

ALB is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.5B annually — 7.8x PRM's $706M. ALB is the more profitable business, keeping -4.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRM's -26.9%. On growth, PRM holds the edge at +73.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPRM logoPRMPerimeter Solutio…ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$706M$5.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$102M$802M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$190M-$233M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$86M$577M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+56.4%+18.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-20.5%+5.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-26.9%-4.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+12.2%+10.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+73.6%+32.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+22.2%
PRM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ALB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
MetricPRM logoPRMPerimeter Solutio…ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
Market CapShares × price$5.8B$20.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$5.5B$21.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-25.89x-29.64x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.34x13.98x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple28.87x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue8.86x3.91x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.66x2.05x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF27.74x29.02x
ALB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ALB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

ALB delivers a -2.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-16 for PRM. PRM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALB's 0.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALB scores 6/9 vs PRM's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricPRM logoPRMPerimeter Solutio…ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-16.4%-2.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-6.9%-1.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital-11.6%+0.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-8.3%+0.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–956
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x0.34x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$292M$1.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$326M$1.6B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$34M$3.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-5.17x1.59x
ALB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PRM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PRM five years ago would be worth $29,558 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,599 for ALB. Over the past 12 months, ALB leads with a +176.0% total return vs PRM's +164.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRM at 78.1% vs ALB's -7.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPRM logoPRMPerimeter Solutio…ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+28.9%+19.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+164.1%+176.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+464.8%-19.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+195.6%+6.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+195.6%+137.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+78.1%-7.0%
PRM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

PRM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

PRM is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALB's 1.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRM currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs ALB's 77.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPRM logoPRMPerimeter Solutio…ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.09x1.69x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$36.01$221.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$13.05$55.90
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.5%+77.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10066.740.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.2M2.0M
PRM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

ALB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates PRM as "Buy" and ALB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 23.1% upside for ALB (target: $210) vs 4.3% for PRM (target: $37). ALB is the only dividend payer here at 0.95% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricPRM logoPRMPerimeter Solutio…ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$37.00$209.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts245
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises032
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.62
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.7%0.0%
ALB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

PRM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). ALB leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).

Best OverallPerimeter Solutions, S.A. (PRM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PRM vs ALB: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PRM or ALB a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Perimeter Solutions, S.

A. (PRM) is the stronger pick with 16. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 4% for Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Analysts rate Perimeter Solutions, S. A. (PRM) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — PRM or ALB?

Over the past 5 years, Perimeter Solutions, S.

A. (PRM) delivered a total return of +195. 6%, compared to +6. 0% for Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRM returned +195. 6% versus ALB's +137. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — PRM or ALB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Perimeter Solutions, S.

A. (PRM) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 09β versus Albemarle Corporation's 1. 69β — meaning ALB is approximately 56% more volatile than PRM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Perimeter Solutions, S. A. (PRM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 34% for Albemarle Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — PRM or ALB?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Perimeter Solutions, S.

A. (PRM) is pulling ahead at 16. 4% versus -4. 4% for Albemarle Corporation (ALB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Albemarle Corporation grew EPS 48. 7% year-over-year, compared to -32. 8% for Perimeter Solutions, S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PRM leads at 21. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — PRM or ALB?

Albemarle Corporation (ALB) is the more profitable company, earning -9.

9% net margin versus -31. 6% for Perimeter Solutions, S. A. — meaning it keeps -9. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALB leads at 1. 8% versus -30. 8% for PRM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRM leads at 57. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is PRM or ALB more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Albemarle Corporation (ALB) trades at 14.

0x forward P/E versus 20. 3x for Perimeter Solutions, S. A. — 6. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALB: 23. 1% to $209. 75.

07

Which pays a better dividend — PRM or ALB?

In this comparison, ALB (0.

9% yield) pays a dividend. PRM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is PRM or ALB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Perimeter Solutions, S.

A. (PRM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), +195. 6% 10Y return). Albemarle Corporation (ALB) carries a higher beta of 1. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRM: +195. 6%, ALB: +137. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between PRM and ALB?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PRM is a small-cap high-growth stock; ALB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ALB pays a dividend while PRM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.