Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
PRM logo
PRM
LIN logo
LIN
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PRM vs LIN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PRM
Perimeter Solutions, S.A.

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.79B
5Y Perf.+201.9%
LIN
Linde plc

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • GB
Market Cap$242.62B
5Y Perf.+64.6%

PRM vs LIN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PRM logoPRM
LIN logoLIN
IndustryChemicals - SpecialtyChemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$5.79B$242.62B
Revenue (TTM)$706M$34.66B
Net Income (TTM)$-190M$7.13B
Gross Margin56.4%46.0%
Operating Margin-20.5%28.8%
Forward P/E20.3x29.3x
Total Debt$34M$26.99B
Cash & Equiv.$326M$5.06B

PRM vs LINLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PRM
LIN
StockNov 21Jun 26Return
Perimeter Solutions… (PRM)100301.9+201.9%
Linde plc (LIN)100164.6+64.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PRM vs LIN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LIN leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Perimeter Solutions, S.A. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇LIN emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
PRM
Perimeter Solutions, S.A.
The Growth Play

PRM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 16.4%, EPS growth -32.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.09, Low D/E 3.0%, current ratio 3.22x
  • 16.4% revenue growth vs LIN's 3.0%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
LIN
Linde plc
The Income Pick

LIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 34 yrs, beta 0.20, yield 1.1%
  • 402.9% 10Y total return vs PRM's 195.6%
  • Beta 0.20, yield 1.1%, current ratio 0.88x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPRM logoPRM16.4% revenue growth vs LIN's 3.0%
ValuePRM logoPRMLower P/E (20.3x vs 29.3x)
Quality / MarginsLIN logoLIN20.6% margin vs PRM's -26.9%
Stability / SafetyLIN logoLINBeta 0.20 vs PRM's 1.09
DividendsLIN logoLIN1.1% yield; 34-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PRM logoPRM+164.1% vs LIN's +12.6%
Efficiency (ROA)LIN logoLIN8.3% ROA vs PRM's -6.9%, ROIC 11.3% vs -11.6%

PRM vs LIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PRMPerimeter Solutions, S.A.
FY 2025
Product
83.4%$544M
Service
16.6%$108M
Product and Service, Other
0.0%$145,000
LINLinde plc
FY 2025
Americas Segment
45.9%$15.2B
EMEA Segment
25.8%$8.5B
APAC Segment
20.1%$6.7B
Engineering Segment
8.2%$2.7B

PRM vs LIN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLINLAGGINGPRM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — PRM and LIN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

LIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $34.7B annually — 49.1x PRM's $706M. LIN is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRM's -26.9%. On growth, PRM holds the edge at +73.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPRM logoPRMPerimeter Solutio…LIN logoLINLinde plc
RevenueTrailing 12 months$706M$34.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$102M$12.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$190M$7.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$86M$5.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+56.4%+46.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-20.5%+28.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-26.9%+20.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+12.2%+14.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+73.6%+8.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+22.2%+13.4%
Evenly matched — PRM and LIN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PRM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
MetricPRM logoPRMPerimeter Solutio…LIN logoLINLinde plc
Market CapShares × price$5.8B$242.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$5.5B$264.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-25.89x35.89x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.34x29.25x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.41x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple20.83x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue8.86x7.14x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.66x6.17x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF27.74x47.68x
PRM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LIN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

LIN delivers a 17.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-16 for PRM. PRM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LIN's 0.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LIN scores 6/9 vs PRM's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricPRM logoPRMPerimeter Solutio…LIN logoLINLinde plc
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-16.4%+17.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-6.9%+8.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-11.6%+11.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-8.3%+13.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–956
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x0.68x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$292M$21.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$326M$5.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$34M$27.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-5.17x34.52x
LIN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PRM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PRM five years ago would be worth $29,558 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,914 for LIN. Over the past 12 months, PRM leads with a +164.1% total return vs LIN's +12.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRM at 78.1% vs LIN's 14.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPRM logoPRMPerimeter Solutio…LIN logoLINLinde plc
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+28.9%+22.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+164.1%+12.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+464.8%+49.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+195.6%+89.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+195.6%+402.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+78.1%+14.3%
PRM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

LIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

LIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRM's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricPRM logoPRMPerimeter Solutio…LIN logoLINLinde plc
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.09x0.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$36.01$525.82
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$13.05$387.78
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.5%+99.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10066.756.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.2M2.0M
LIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

LIN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates PRM as "Buy" and LIN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.4% upside for LIN (target: $562) vs 4.3% for PRM (target: $37). LIN is the only dividend payer here at 1.15% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricPRM logoPRMPerimeter Solutio…LIN logoLINLinde plc
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$37.00$562.14
# AnalystsCovering analysts228
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises034
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$6.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.7%+1.9%
LIN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

LIN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). PRM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallLinde plc (LIN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PRM vs LIN: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PRM or LIN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Perimeter Solutions, S.

A. (PRM) is the stronger pick with 16. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for Linde plc (LIN). Linde plc (LIN) offers the better valuation at 35. 9x trailing P/E (29. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Perimeter Solutions, S. A. (PRM) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PRM or LIN?

On forward P/E, Perimeter Solutions, S.

A. is actually cheaper at 20. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PRM or LIN?

Over the past 5 years, Perimeter Solutions, S.

A. (PRM) delivered a total return of +195. 6%, compared to +89. 1% for Linde plc (LIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LIN returned +402. 9% versus PRM's +195. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PRM or LIN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Linde plc (LIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

20β versus Perimeter Solutions, S. A. 's 1. 09β — meaning PRM is approximately 449% more volatile than LIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Perimeter Solutions, S. A. (PRM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 68% for Linde plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PRM or LIN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Perimeter Solutions, S.

A. (PRM) is pulling ahead at 16. 4% versus 3. 0% for Linde plc (LIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Linde plc grew EPS 7. 1% year-over-year, compared to -32. 8% for Perimeter Solutions, S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PRM leads at 21. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PRM or LIN?

Linde plc (LIN) is the more profitable company, earning 20.

3% net margin versus -31. 6% for Perimeter Solutions, S. A. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LIN leads at 26. 3% versus -30. 8% for PRM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRM leads at 57. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PRM or LIN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Perimeter Solutions, S.

A. (PRM) trades at 20. 3x forward P/E versus 29. 3x for Linde plc — 8. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LIN: 7. 4% to $562. 14.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PRM or LIN?

In this comparison, LIN (1.

1% yield) pays a dividend. PRM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is PRM or LIN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

20), 1. 1% yield, +402. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIN: +402. 9%, PRM: +195. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PRM and LIN?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PRM is a small-cap high-growth stock; LIN is a large-cap quality compounder stock. LIN pays a dividend while PRM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.