Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
PRQR logo
PRQR
REGN logo
REGN
JPM logo
JPM
KO logo
KO
NTLA logo
NTLA
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PRQR vs REGN vs JPM vs KO vs NTLA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PRQR
ProQR Therapeutics N.V.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • NL
Market Cap$152M
5Y Perf.-76.3%
REGN
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$63.60B
5Y Perf.-1.8%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%
NTLA
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.36B
5Y Perf.-42.4%

PRQR vs REGN vs JPM vs KO vs NTLA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PRQR logoPRQR
REGN logoREGN
JPM logoJPM
KO logoKO
NTLA logoNTLA
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBanks - DiversifiedBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBiotechnology
Market Cap$152M$63.60B$896.00B$355.61B$1.36B
Revenue (TTM)$13M$14.92B$280.33B$49.28B$66M
Net Income (TTM)$-46M$4.42B$57.05B$13.70B$-395M
Gross Margin89.7%84.5%60.0%61.7%-31.9%
Operating Margin-345.5%24.3%25.9%29.3%-6.4%
Forward P/E13.2x14.4x25.3x
Total Debt$14M$2.71B$942.38B$45.49B$93M
Cash & Equiv.$92M$3.12B$343.34B$10.27B$155M

PRQR vs REGN vs JPM vs KO vs NTLALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PRQR
REGN
JPM
KO
NTLA
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
ProQR Therapeutics … (PRQR)10023.7-76.3%
Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN)10098.2-1.8%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%
Intellia Therapeuti… (NTLA)10057.6-42.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PRQR vs REGN vs JPM vs KO vs NTLA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: REGN and KO are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. The Coca-Cola Company is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and operational efficiency and capital deployment. NTLA and JPM also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
PRQR
ProQR Therapeutics N.V.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, PRQR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
REGN
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

REGN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.51, Low D/E 8.7%, current ratio 4.13x
  • Beta 0.51, yield 0.6%, current ratio 4.13x
  • 29.6% margin vs NTLA's -6.0%
  • Beta 0.51 vs NTLA's 2.28, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
  • PEG 0.81 vs KO's 2.26
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Income Pick

KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.5%
  • 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
  • 13.1% ROA vs NTLA's -46.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs -44.0%
Best for: income & stability
NTLA
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.
The Growth Play

NTLA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 16.9%, EPS growth 27.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.1%
  • 16.9% revenue growth vs PRQR's -19.2%
  • +45.0% vs PRQR's -25.8%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNTLA logoNTLA16.9% revenue growth vs PRQR's -19.2%
ValueJPM logoJPMBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsREGN logoREGN29.6% margin vs NTLA's -6.0%
Stability / SafetyREGN logoREGNBeta 0.51 vs NTLA's 2.28, lower leverage
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)NTLA logoNTLA+45.0% vs PRQR's -25.8%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs NTLA's -46.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs -44.0%

PRQR vs REGN vs JPM vs KO vs NTLA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
PRQRProQR Therapeutics N.V.
FY 2024
Up-front payments
75.4%$16M
Milestone payments
24.6%$5M
REGNRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
FY 2025
Collaboration Revenue
51.1%$7.3B
Product
44.0%$6.3B
Product and Service, Other
4.9%$703M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
NTLAIntellia Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

PRQR vs REGN vs JPM vs KO vs NTLA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGNTLA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

REGN leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 20854.3x PRQR's $13M. REGN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTLA's -6.0%. On growth, REGN holds the edge at +19.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPRQR logoPRQRProQR Therapeutic…REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$13M$14.9B$280.3B$49.3B$66M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$44M$4.2B$81.4B$15.5B-$411M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$46M$4.4B$57.0B$13.7B-$395M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$49M$4.2B$100.9B$12.6B-$364M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+89.7%+84.5%+60.0%+61.7%-31.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-3.5%+24.3%+25.9%+29.3%-6.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-3.4%+29.6%+20.4%+27.8%-6.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-3.6%+27.9%+36.0%+25.5%-5.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-54.3%+19.0%+12.1%-9.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-30.0%-7.2%+16.0%+18.2%+26.4%
REGN leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 14.8x trailing earnings, REGN trades at a 46% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricPRQR logoPRQRProQR Therapeutic…REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…
Market CapShares × price$152M$63.6B$896.0B$355.6B$1.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$61M$63.2B$1.50T$390.8B$1.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-3.28x14.76x16.00x27.18x-3.18x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.18x14.40x25.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.33x0.90x2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple15.33x18.36x26.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue8.59x4.43x3.20x7.42x20.08x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.66x2.13x2.47x10.40x1.95x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF15.59x8.88x67.15x
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-86 for PRQR. REGN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs PRQR's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPRQR logoPRQRProQR Therapeutic…REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-86.5%+14.3%+15.9%+41.1%-57.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-38.5%+11.1%+1.3%+13.1%-46.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.9%+4.5%+15.8%-44.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-40.3%+10.2%+8.9%+17.3%-48.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–915574
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.28x0.09x2.60x1.33x0.14x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$78M-$412M$599.0B$35.2B-$62M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$92M$3.1B$343.3B$10.3B$155M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$14M$2.7B$942.4B$45.5B$93M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-48.66x108.44x0.74x10.70x
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,376 for NTLA. Over the past 12 months, NTLA leads with a +45.0% total return vs PRQR's -25.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs NTLA's -34.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPRQR logoPRQRProQR Therapeutic…REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-27.6%-20.9%-0.5%+20.3%+31.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-25.8%+18.0%+21.8%+17.2%+45.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-12.7%-18.1%+138.2%+47.0%-72.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-80.6%+16.8%+118.2%+65.6%-86.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-68.2%+68.2%+465.8%+121.1%-54.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-4.4%-6.4%+33.6%+13.7%-34.8%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NTLA's 2.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs NTLA's 42.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPRQR logoPRQRProQR Therapeutic…REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.62x0.51x0.94x-0.20x2.28x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.10$821.11$337.25$84.04$28.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.33$503.25$262.71$65.35$7.95
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+46.5%+74.6%+95.1%+98.3%+42.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10042.837.559.160.643.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded653K868K7.0M12.7M6.3M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: PRQR as "Buy", REGN as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy", NTLA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 152.1% upside for PRQR (target: $4) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs REGN's 0.56%.

MetricPRQR logoPRQRProQR Therapeutic…REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$3.63$836.00$339.75$86.13$26.29
# AnalystsCovering analysts1048614839
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.6%+1.9%+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises11556
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.41$5.95$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+6.2%+3.9%+0.2%0.0%
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). JPM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PRQR vs REGN vs JPM vs KO vs NTLA: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PRQR or REGN or JPM or KO or NTLA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.

(NTLA) is the stronger pick with 16. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 2% for ProQR Therapeutics N. V. (PRQR). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 14. 8x trailing P/E (13. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ProQR Therapeutics N. V. (PRQR) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PRQR or REGN or JPM or KO or NTLA?

On trailing P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(REGN) is the cheapest at 14. 8x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PRQR or REGN or JPM or KO or NTLA?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -86. 2% for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus PRQR's -68. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PRQR or REGN or JPM or KO or NTLA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 28β — meaning NTLA is approximately -1237% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PRQR or REGN or JPM or KO or NTLA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.

(NTLA) is pulling ahead at 16. 9% versus -19. 2% for ProQR Therapeutics N. V. (PRQR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 27. 4% year-over-year, compared to -11. 8% for ProQR Therapeutics N. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PRQR leads at 62. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PRQR or REGN or JPM or KO or NTLA?

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(REGN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus -609. 9% for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -651. 7% for NTLA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — REGN leads at 85. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PRQR or REGN or JPM or KO or NTLA more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) trades at 13. 2x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 12. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRQR: 152. 1% to $3. 63.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PRQR or REGN or JPM or KO or NTLA?

In this comparison, KO (2.

5% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), REGN (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. PRQR, NTLA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is PRQR or REGN or JPM or KO or NTLA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, NTLA: -54. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PRQR and REGN and JPM and KO and NTLA?

These companies operate in different sectors (PRQR (Healthcare) and REGN (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and NTLA (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: PRQR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; NTLA is a small-cap high-growth stock. REGN, JPM, KO pay a dividend while PRQR, NTLA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.