Comprehensive Stock Comparison

Compare QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) vs NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) vs Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) Stock

Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.

Tickers 3 / 10100+ Metrics

Selected Stocks

Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.

3 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Quick Verdict

CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNVDA65.5% revenue growth vs QCOM's 13.7%
ValueTSMLower P/E (0.8x vs 21.9x), PEG 0.03 vs 0.23
Quality / MarginsNVDA55.6% net margin vs QCOM's 12.0%
Stability / SafetyTSMBeta 1.44 vs NVDA's 1.73
DividendsQCOM2.4% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0%
Momentum (1Y)TSM+108.8% vs QCOM's -7.2%
Efficiency (ROA)NVDA58.1% ROA vs QCOM's 10.1%, ROIC 81.8% vs 29.1%
Bottom line: NVDA and TSM each win 3 categories — the better choice depends on your priorities. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited is the better choice for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As direct sector peers, they can serve as alternatives in the same portfolio allocation.

Who Each Stock Is For

Income & stability

Growth exposure

Long-term compounding (10Y)

Sleep-well-at-night portfolio

Valuation efficiency (growth/$)

Defensive / Recession hedge

Business Model

What each company does and how it makes money

QCOMQUALCOMM Incorporated
Technology

Qualcomm is a semiconductor and wireless technology company that designs and licenses foundational technologies for mobile communications. It generates revenue primarily through selling smartphone chipsets (~75% of revenue) and licensing its extensive patent portfolio for wireless standards like 5G (~25% of revenue). The company's key advantage is its massive portfolio of essential wireless patents—particularly in CDMA and 5G—which creates a licensing moat that generates high-margin recurring revenue.

NVDANVIDIA Corporation
Technology

NVIDIA designs and sells graphics processing units (GPUs) and accelerated computing platforms that power artificial intelligence, gaming, and professional visualization applications. The company generates revenue primarily through its Data Center segment — which includes AI chips and systems — accounting for over 70% of sales, supplemented by its Gaming GPU business and professional visualization offerings. NVIDIA's competitive moat stems from its CUDA software ecosystem — which locks developers into its hardware architecture — and its years of architectural leadership in parallel processing for AI workloads.

TSMTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
Technology

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company is the world's largest dedicated semiconductor foundry, manufacturing advanced chips for technology companies that design but don't produce their own silicon. It generates revenue primarily from wafer fabrication services — with high-performance computing and smartphone chips driving over 80% of sales — supplemented by packaging, testing, and mask-making services. Its competitive moat stems from unmatched manufacturing scale, technological leadership in advanced process nodes, and deep customer relationships that create switching costs for chip designers.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

QCOMQUALCOMM Incorporated
FY 2025
QCT
87.3%$38.4B
QTL
12.7%$5.6B
NVDANVIDIA Corporation
FY 2026
Data Center
89.7%$193.7B
Gaming
7.4%$16.0B
Professional Visualization
1.5%$3.2B
Automotive
1.1%$2.3B
OEM And Other
0.3%$619M
TSMTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
FY 2024
Other Products
100.0%$379.8B

Financial Metrics Comparison

Side-by-side fundamentals across 3 stocks. BestLagging

Financial Scorecard

NVDA 3QCOM 2TSM 1
Financial MetricsNVDA6/6 metrics
Valuation MetricsQCOM5/7 metrics
Profitability & EfficiencyNVDA7/9 metrics
Total ReturnsNVDA4/6 metrics
Risk & VolatilityTSM2/2 metrics
Analyst OutlookQCOM2/2 metrics

NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). QCOM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).

Financial Metrics (TTM)

TSM is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.82T annually — 85.1x QCOM's $44.9B. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to QCOM's 12.0%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +73.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…NVDANVIDIA CorporationTSMTaiwan Semiconduc…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$44.9B$215.9B$3.82T
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$13.3B$133.2B$2.79T
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$5.4B$120.1B$1.72T
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$12.9B$96.7B$1.02T
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+55.1%+71.1%+59.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+27.1%+60.4%+50.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+12.0%+55.6%+45.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+28.8%+44.8%+26.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+5.0%+73.2%+21.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-1.8%+97.8%+42.0%
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

At 28.4x trailing earnings, QCOM trades at a 21% valuation discount to NVDA's 36.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NVDA offers better value at 0.38x vs QCOM's 13.66x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…NVDANVIDIA CorporationTSMTaiwan Semiconduc…
Market CapShares × price$152.9B$4.31T$1.94T
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$161.4B$4.31T$1.89T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS28.42x36.16x35.15x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.74x21.88x0.84x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate13.66x0.38x1.27x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.57x32.33x22.35x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.45x19.94x15.85x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share7.42x27.52x11.20x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.93x44.54x55.58x
QCOM leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $23 for QCOM. NVDA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QCOM's 0.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TSM scores 8/9 vs NVDA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…NVDANVIDIA CorporationTSMTaiwan Semiconduc…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+23.3%+76.3%+31.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+10.1%+58.1%+21.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+29.1%+81.8%+42.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+28.9%+97.2%+33.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9648
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.77x0.07x0.18x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$8.5B$807M-$1.77T
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$7.8B$10.6B$2.76T
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$16.4B$11.4B$990.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense18.76x545.03x315.91x
NVDA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (with DRIP)

A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $128,116 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,332 for QCOM. Over the past 12 months, TSM leads with a +108.8% total return vs QCOM's -7.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 96.9% vs QCOM's 7.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…NVDANVIDIA CorporationTSMTaiwan Semiconduc…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-17.7%-6.2%+17.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-7.2%+41.9%+108.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+23.4%+663.5%+336.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+13.3%+1181.2%+196.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+234.4%+22525.7%+1552.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+7.2%+96.9%+63.5%
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

TSM is the less volatile stock with a 1.44 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVDA's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TSM currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs QCOM's 69.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…NVDANVIDIA CorporationTSMTaiwan Semiconduc…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.48x1.73x1.44x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$205.95$212.19$390.20
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$120.80$86.62$134.25
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+69.1%+83.5%+96.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.947.462.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded8.1M136.2M11.1M
TSM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Analyst consensus: QCOM as "Buy", NVDA as "Buy", TSM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 52.9% upside for NVDA (target: $271) vs 8.9% for TSM (target: $408). For income investors, QCOM offers the higher dividend yield at 2.42% vs TSM's 0.77%.

MetricQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…NVDANVIDIA CorporationTSMTaiwan Semiconduc…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$161.50$271.00$408.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts677923
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.4%+0.0%+0.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2325
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.44$0.04$90.94
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+5.7%+0.9%0.0%
QCOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Historical Charts

Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.

Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)

StockMar 20Feb 26Change
QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM)100189.45+89.4%
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)1002,686.11+2586.1%
Taiwan Semiconducto… (TSM)100609.79+509.8%

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) returned +1.2K% over 5 years vs QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM)'s +13%. A $10,000 investment in NVDA 5 years ago would be worth $128,116 today (including dividends reinvested).

Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years

Stock20172026Change
QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM)$22.3B$44.3B+98.7%
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)$6.9B$215.9B+3025.0%
Taiwan Semiconducto… (TSM)$977.4B$3.8T+293.7%

NVIDIA Corporation's revenue grew from $6.9B (2017) to $215.9B (2026) — a 46.6% CAGR.

Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years

Stock20172026Change
QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM)11.1%12.5%+13.1%
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)24.1%55.6%+130.6%
Taiwan Semiconducto… (TSM)35.3%45.1%+27.8%

NVIDIA Corporation's net margin went from 24% (2017) to 56% (2026).

Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 10 Years

Stock20172026Change
QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM)3934.1-12.6%
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)75.636.2-52.1%
Taiwan Semiconducto… (TSM)0.60.9+50.0%

QUALCOMM Incorporated has traded in a 10x–39x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~28x. NVIDIA Corporation has traded in a 28x–291x P/E range over 10 years; current trailing P/E is ~36x.

Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years

Stock20172026Change
QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM)1.645.01+205.5%
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)0.064.9+7556.3%
Taiwan Semiconducto… (TSM)66.5334.65+403.2%

NVIDIA Corporation's EPS grew from $0.06 (2017) to $4.90 (2026) — a 62% CAGR.

Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years

2022
$7B
$8B
$521B
2023
$10B
$4B
$287B
2024
$11B
$27B
$870B
2025
$13B
$61B
$1098B
2026
$97B
QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM)NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)Taiwan Semiconducto… (TSM)

QUALCOMM Incorporated generated $13B FCF in 2025 (+48% vs 2021). NVIDIA Corporation generated $97B FCF in 2026 (+1960% vs 2021).

Loading custom metrics...

QCOM vs NVDA vs TSM: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is QCOM or NVDA or TSM a better buy right now?

QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) offers the better valuation at 28.4x trailing P/E (12.7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) a "Buy" — based on 67 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — QCOM or NVDA or TSM?

On trailing P/E, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the cheapest at 28.4x versus NVIDIA Corporation at 36.2x. On forward P/E, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited is actually cheaper at 0.8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited wins at 0.03x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 6.13x — a PEG below 1.0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — QCOM or NVDA or TSM?

Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1181%, compared to +13.3% for QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM). A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth approximately $128K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +225.3% versus QCOM's +234.4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — QCOM or NVDA or TSM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is the lower-risk stock at 1.44β versus NVIDIA Corporation's 1.73β — meaning NVDA is approximately 19% more volatile than TSM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 77% for QUALCOMM Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which has better profit margins — QCOM or NVDA or TSM?

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.6% net margin versus 12.5% for QUALCOMM Incorporated — meaning it keeps 55.6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60.4% versus 27.9% for QCOM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71.1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is QCOM or NVDA or TSM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential. By this metric, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0.03x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 6.13x. A PEG below 1.0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) trades at 0.8x forward P/E versus 21.9x for NVIDIA Corporation — 21.0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVDA: 52.9% to $271.00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — QCOM or NVDA or TSM?

In this comparison, QCOM (2.4% yield), TSM (0.8% yield) pay a dividend. NVDA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is QCOM or NVDA or TSM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.8% yield, +1552% 10Y return). NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a higher beta of 1.73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TSM: +1552%, NVDA: +225.3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between QCOM and NVDA and TSM?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. QCOM, TSM pay a dividend while NVDA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.

💰
Stocks Like

QCOM

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.9%
Run This Screen
🚀
Stocks Like

NVDA

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 36%
  • Net Margin > 33%
Run This Screen
🚀
Stocks Like

TSM

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 27%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Better Than Both

Find stocks that beat QCOM and NVDA and TSM on the metrics you choose

Revenue Growth>
%
(QCOM: 5.0% · NVDA: 73.2%)
Net Margin>
%
(QCOM: 12.0% · NVDA: 55.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(QCOM: 28.4x · NVDA: 36.2x)