Aerospace & Defense
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
RAL vs ROP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
RAL vs ROP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $7.40B | $34.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.12B | $8.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.24B | $1.71B |
| Gross Margin | 46.2% | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | 28.1% |
| Forward P/E | 24.9x | 15.3x |
| Total Debt | $1.15B | $9.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $319M | $297M |
RAL vs ROP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ralliant Corp. (RAL) | 100 | 136.3 | +36.3% |
| Roper Technologies,… (ROP) | 100 | 59.1 | -40.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RAL vs ROP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RAL is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +39.5% vs ROP's -40.8%
ROP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.32, yield 1.0%
- Rev growth 12.3%, EPS growth -1.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.7%
- 112.0% 10Y total return vs RAL's 39.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.3% revenue growth vs RAL's -4.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.3x vs 24.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.1% margin vs RAL's -58.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs RAL's 1.69, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.5% vs ROP's -40.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.0% ROA vs RAL's -27.7%, ROIC 6.1% vs 6.2% |
RAL vs ROP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RAL vs ROP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ROP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ROP is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.1B annually — 3.8x RAL's $2.1B. ROP is the more profitable business, keeping 21.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RAL's -58.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.1B | $8.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $371M | $3.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.2B | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $302M | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.2% | +69.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +28.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -58.6% | +21.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.2% | +31.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.0% | +11.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.3% | +59.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ROP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ROP's 14.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RAL's 22.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.4B | $34.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.2B | $43.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.13x | 23.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.92x | 15.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.46x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.98x | 13.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.58x | 4.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.59x | 1.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.64x | 13.83x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ROP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ROP delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-52 for RAL. ROP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.47x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RAL's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ROP scores 6/9 vs RAL's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -51.7% | +8.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -27.7% | +5.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.2% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.6% | +7.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.70x | 0.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $830M | $9.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $319M | $297M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $9.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.37x | 6.50x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RAL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RAL five years ago would be worth $13,954 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,526 for ROP. Over the past 12 months, RAL leads with a +39.5% total return vs ROP's -40.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RAL at 11.7% vs ROP's -8.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +29.2% | -22.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.5% | -40.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.5% | -24.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.5% | -24.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.5% | +112.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.7% | -8.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RAL and ROP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ROP is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RAL's 1.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RAL currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs ROP's 58.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.69x | 0.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $67.01 | $575.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $37.27 | $305.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.6% | +58.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.9 | 48.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
ROP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RAL as "Buy" and ROP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 36.6% upside for ROP (target: $458) vs -10.5% for RAL (target: $59). ROP is the only dividend payer here at 0.98% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $59.17 | $457.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.5% |
ROP leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). RAL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
RAL vs ROP: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RAL or ROP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Roper Technologies, Inc.
(ROP) is the stronger pick with 12. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 0% for Ralliant Corp. (RAL). Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) offers the better valuation at 23. 6x trailing P/E (15. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ralliant Corp. (RAL) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RAL or ROP?
On forward P/E, Roper Technologies, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 15. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RAL or ROP?
Over the past 5 years, Ralliant Corp.
(RAL) delivered a total return of +39. 5%, compared to -24. 7% for Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ROP returned +112. 0% versus RAL's +39. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RAL or ROP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Roper Technologies, Inc.
(ROP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 32β versus Ralliant Corp. 's 1. 69β — meaning RAL is approximately 431% more volatile than ROP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 47% versus 70% for Ralliant Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RAL or ROP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Roper Technologies, Inc.
(ROP) is pulling ahead at 12. 3% versus -4. 0% for Ralliant Corp. (RAL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Roper Technologies, Inc. grew EPS -1. 0% year-over-year, compared to -502. 2% for Ralliant Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RAL or ROP?
Roper Technologies, Inc.
(ROP) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 4% net margin versus -59. 1% for Ralliant Corp. — meaning it keeps 19. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ROP leads at 28. 3% versus 12. 5% for RAL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ROP leads at 69. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RAL or ROP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Roper Technologies, Inc.
(ROP) trades at 15. 3x forward P/E versus 24. 9x for Ralliant Corp. — 9. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ROP: 36. 6% to $457. 64.
08Which pays a better dividend — RAL or ROP?
In this comparison, ROP (1.
0% yield) pays a dividend. RAL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RAL or ROP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Roper Technologies, Inc.
(ROP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 32), 1. 0% yield, +112. 0% 10Y return). Ralliant Corp. (RAL) carries a higher beta of 1. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ROP: +112. 0%, RAL: +39. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RAL and ROP?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
ROP pays a dividend while RAL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.