Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
RBKB vs CZWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
RBKB vs CZWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $186M | $207M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $76M | $90M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $10M | $14M |
| Gross Margin | 68.2% | 54.7% |
| Operating Margin | 16.7% | 7.0% |
| Forward P/E | 18.2x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $30M | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17M | $119M |
RBKB vs CZWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rhinebeck Bancorp, … (RBKB) | 100 | 254.7 | +154.7% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 312.8 | +212.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RBKB vs CZWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RBKB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.29
- Rev growth 39.8%, EPS growth 215.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.29, Low D/E 22.1%, current ratio 493.23x
CZWI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 149.0% 10Y total return vs RBKB's 42.2%
- Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs RBKB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- 1.7% yield; 6-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 39.8% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | PEG 1.68 vs 2.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs RBKB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.29 vs CZWI's 0.50, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield; 6-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.1% vs RBKB's +34.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs RBKB's 0.5% |
RBKB vs CZWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RBKB vs CZWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RBKB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CZWI and RBKB operate at a comparable scale, with $90M and $76M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 16.0% (CZWI) to 13.2% (RBKB).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $76M | $90M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14M | $9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $10M | $14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $11M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.2% | +54.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.7% | +7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +12.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +184.0% | +63.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — RBKB and CZWI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, CZWI trades at a 19% valuation discount to RBKB's 18.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), RBKB offers better value at 1.68x vs CZWI's 2.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $186M | $207M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $200M | $140M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.16x | 14.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.68x | 2.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.70x | 15.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.45x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.34x | 1.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.09x | 19.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RBKB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CZWI delivers a 7.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $8 for RBKB. RBKB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CZWI's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RBKB scores 8/9 vs CZWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.7% | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.2% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.7% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13M | -$67M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17M | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30M | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.56x | 0.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $16,900 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,573 for RBKB. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +52.1% total return vs RBKB's +34.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs RBKB's 36.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +39.5% | +24.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +34.8% | +52.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +151.9% | +153.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.7% | +69.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.2% | +149.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +36.1% | +36.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RBKB and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RBKB is the less volatile stock with a 0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CZWI's 0.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.29x | 0.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.99 | $22.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.41 | $12.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.9% | +94.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.2 | 51.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11K | 41K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
CZWI is the only dividend payer here at 1.73% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +3.0% |
RBKB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CZWI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
RBKB vs CZWI: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RBKB or CZWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Rhinebeck Bancorp, Inc.
(RBKB) is the stronger pick with 39. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RBKB or CZWI?
On trailing P/E, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the cheapest at 14. 7x versus Rhinebeck Bancorp, Inc. at 18. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RBKB or CZWI?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +69. 0%, compared to +55. 7% for Rhinebeck Bancorp, Inc. (RBKB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +149. 0% versus RBKB's +42. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RBKB or CZWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rhinebeck Bancorp, Inc.
(RBKB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 29β versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 50β — meaning CZWI is approximately 71% more volatile than RBKB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rhinebeck Bancorp, Inc. (RBKB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 28% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RBKB or CZWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rhinebeck Bancorp, Inc.
(RBKB) is pulling ahead at 39. 8% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rhinebeck Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 215. 0% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RBKB or CZWI?
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 0% net margin versus 13. 2% for Rhinebeck Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RBKB leads at 16. 7% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RBKB leads at 68. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — RBKB or CZWI?
In this comparison, CZWI (1.
7% yield) pays a dividend. RBKB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is RBKB or CZWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 50), 1. 7% yield, +149. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +149. 0%, RBKB: +42. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between RBKB and CZWI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RBKB is a small-cap high-growth stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock. CZWI pays a dividend while RBKB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.