Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
RBKB logo
RBKB
FXNC logo
FXNC
JPM logo
JPM
FIS logo
FIS
CZWI logo
CZWI
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

RBKB vs FXNC vs JPM vs FIS vs CZWI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
RBKB
Rhinebeck Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$186M
5Y Perf.+154.7%
FXNC
First National Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$273M
5Y Perf.+117.5%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.26B
5Y Perf.-70.8%
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$207M
5Y Perf.+212.8%

RBKB vs FXNC vs JPM vs FIS vs CZWI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
RBKB logoRBKB
FXNC logoFXNC
JPM logoJPM
FIS logoFIS
CZWI logoCZWI
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - DiversifiedInformation Technology ServicesBanks - Regional
Market Cap$186M$273M$896.00B$20.26B$207M
Revenue (TTM)$76M$115M$280.33B$11.66B$90M
Net Income (TTM)$10M$18M$57.05B$2.67B$14M
Gross Margin68.2%74.7%60.0%37.6%54.7%
Operating Margin16.7%19.0%25.9%17.9%7.0%
Forward P/E18.2x12.8x14.4x6.2x11.8x
Total Debt$30M$43M$942.38B$4.01B$52M
Cash & Equiv.$17M$161M$343.34B$599M$119M

RBKB vs FXNC vs JPM vs FIS vs CZWILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

RBKB
FXNC
JPM
FIS
CZWI
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Rhinebeck Bancorp, … (RBKB)100254.7+154.7%
First National Corp… (FXNC)100217.5+117.5%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10029.2-70.8%
Citizens Community … (CZWI)100312.8+212.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: RBKB vs FXNC vs JPM vs FIS vs CZWI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FIS leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Rhinebeck Bancorp, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. FXNC also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇FIS emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
RBKB
Rhinebeck Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

RBKB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Rev growth 39.8%, EPS growth 215.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.29, Low D/E 22.1%, current ratio 493.23x
  • 39.8% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
  • Beta 0.29 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
FXNC
First National Corporation
The Banking Pick

FXNC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and bank quality.

  • Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 2.0%
  • NIM 3.6% vs JPM's 2.2%
  • +57.8% vs FIS's -49.4%
Best for: income & stability and bank quality
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs FXNC's 258.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Value Pick

FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.26 vs FXNC's 8.59
  • Lower P/E (6.2x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.81
  • 22.9% margin vs RBKB's 13.2%
  • 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: valuation efficiency
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 0.50, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
Best for: defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRBKB logoRBKB39.8% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (6.2x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.81
Quality / MarginsFIS logoFIS22.9% margin vs RBKB's 13.2%
Stability / SafetyRBKB logoRBKBBeta 0.29 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
DividendsFIS logoFIS4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)FXNC logoFXNC+57.8% vs FIS's -49.4%
Efficiency (ROA)FIS logoFIS7.5% ROA vs RBKB's 0.8%, ROIC 6.0% vs 5.2%

RBKB vs FXNC vs JPM vs FIS vs CZWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
RBKBRhinebeck Bancorp, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

FXNCFirst National Corporation
FY 2018
Bank Servicing And Deposit Account
41.2%$3M
Credit And Debit Card
29.2%$2M
Financial Service, Wealth Management
21.8%$2M
Financial Service, Other
7.8%$601,000
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B
CZWICitizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$99M

RBKB vs FXNC vs JPM vs FIS vs CZWI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFISLAGGINGCZWI

Who Leads Where

FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories

RBKB leads 0 • FXNC leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • CZWI leads 0 • 5 tied

Explore the data ↓
CZWICitizens Community Ba…
0leads
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
0leads
FXNCFirst National Corpor…
0leads
RBKBRhinebeck Bancorp, In…
0leads
FISFidelity National Inf…
1leads
6 Total Categories

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — JPM and FIS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 3696.1x RBKB's $76M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RBKB's 13.2%.

MetricRBKB logoRBKBRhinebeck Bancorp…FXNC logoFXNCFirst National Co…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$76M$115M$280.3B$11.7B$90M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$14M$25M$81.4B$4.1B$9M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$10M$18M$57.0B$2.7B$14M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$11M$21M$100.9B$2.8B$11M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+68.2%+74.7%+60.0%+37.6%+54.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+16.7%+19.0%+25.9%+17.9%+7.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+13.2%+15.4%+20.4%+22.9%+16.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+14.9%+18.2%+36.0%+23.9%+12.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+184.0%+7.1%+16.0%+30.6%+63.0%
Evenly matched — JPM and FIS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 14.7x trailing earnings, CZWI trades at a 72% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs FXNC's 10.32x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricRBKB logoRBKBRhinebeck Bancorp…FXNC logoFXNCFirst National Co…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
Market CapShares × price$186M$273M$896.0B$20.3B$207M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$200M$155M$1.50T$23.7B$140M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS18.16x15.40x16.00x52.27x14.70x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.82x14.40x6.24x11.79x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.68x10.32x0.90x2.14x2.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.70x7.05x18.36x6.50x15.69x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.45x2.43x3.20x1.90x2.29x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.34x1.46x2.47x1.46x1.11x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF17.09x12.99x8.88x7.21x19.90x
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — RBKB and FXNC and FIS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $8 for RBKB. RBKB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RBKB scores 8/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricRBKB logoRBKBRhinebeck Bancorp…FXNC logoFXNCFirst National Co…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.7%+10.0%+15.9%+18.4%+7.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.8%+0.9%+1.3%+7.5%+0.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.2%+7.7%+4.5%+6.0%+2.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.7%+9.9%+8.9%+6.6%+0.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–987566
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.22x0.23x2.60x0.29x0.28x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$13M-$118M$599.0B$3.4B-$67M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$17M$161M$343.3B$599M$119M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$30M$43M$942.4B$4.0B$52M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.56x0.84x0.74x21.16x0.16x
Evenly matched — RBKB and FXNC and FIS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — JPM and CZWI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, FXNC leads with a +57.8% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricRBKB logoRBKBRhinebeck Bancorp…FXNC logoFXNCFirst National Co…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+39.5%+24.4%-0.5%-38.9%+24.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+34.8%+57.8%+21.8%-49.4%+52.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+151.9%+103.7%+138.2%-18.9%+153.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+55.7%+71.0%+118.2%-67.3%+69.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+42.2%+258.5%+465.8%-25.6%+149.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+36.1%+26.8%+33.6%-6.8%+36.4%
Evenly matched — JPM and CZWI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — RBKB and FXNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

RBKB is the less volatile stock with a 0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FXNC currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricRBKB logoRBKBRhinebeck Bancorp…FXNC logoFXNCFirst National Co…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.29x0.52x0.94x0.61x0.50x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.99$30.51$337.25$82.74$22.62
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$9.41$18.31$262.71$37.91$12.83
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+92.9%+99.0%+95.1%+47.4%+94.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10063.267.059.130.851.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded11K79K7.0M5.6M41K
Evenly matched — RBKB and FXNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — JPM and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: FXNC as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs -30.4% for FXNC (target: $21). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs CZWI's 1.73%.

MetricRBKB logoRBKBRhinebeck Bancorp…FXNC logoFXNCFirst National Co…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$21.00$339.75$62.88
# AnalystsCovering analysts161372
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.0%+1.9%+4.2%+1.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises111516
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.61$5.95$1.63$0.37
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%+0.1%+3.9%+7.0%+3.0%
Evenly matched — JPM and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics. 5 categories are tied.

Best OverallFidelity National Informati… (FIS)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

RBKB vs FXNC vs JPM vs FIS vs CZWI: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is RBKB or FXNC or JPM or FIS or CZWI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Rhinebeck Bancorp, Inc.

(RBKB) is the stronger pick with 39. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First National Corporation (FXNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — RBKB or FXNC or JPM or FIS or CZWI?

On trailing P/E, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

(CZWI) is the cheapest at 14. 7x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus First National Corporation's 8. 59x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — RBKB or FXNC or JPM or FIS or CZWI?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — RBKB or FXNC or JPM or FIS or CZWI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rhinebeck Bancorp, Inc.

(RBKB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 29β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 224% more volatile than RBKB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rhinebeck Bancorp, Inc. (RBKB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — RBKB or FXNC or JPM or FIS or CZWI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rhinebeck Bancorp, Inc.

(RBKB) is pulling ahead at 39. 8% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rhinebeck Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 215. 0% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — RBKB or FXNC or JPM or FIS or CZWI?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FXNC leads at 74. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is RBKB or FXNC or JPM or FIS or CZWI more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus First National Corporation's 8. 59x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 8. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — RBKB or FXNC or JPM or FIS or CZWI?

In this comparison, FIS (4.

2% yield), FXNC (2. 0% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), CZWI (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. RBKB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is RBKB or FXNC or JPM or FIS or CZWI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

52), 2. 0% yield, +258. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FXNC: +258. 5%, RBKB: +42. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between RBKB and FXNC and JPM and FIS and CZWI?

These companies operate in different sectors (RBKB (Financial Services) and FXNC (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and CZWI (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: RBKB is a small-cap high-growth stock; FXNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock. FXNC, JPM, FIS, CZWI pay a dividend while RBKB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.