RICK
RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc.
Restaurants
Market Cap$216M
5Y Perf.+104.0%
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisRICK
DIN
Try popular comparisons:
Stock Comparison
RICK vs DIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
DIN
Dine Brands Global, Inc.
Restaurants
Market Cap$443M
5Y Perf.-18.9%
RICK vs DIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot |  RICK |  DIN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $216M | $443M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $282M | $890M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $16M |
| Gross Margin | 55.2% | 39.1% |
| Operating Margin | 12.3% | 15.5% |
| Forward P/E | 4.6x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $266M | $1.60B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $34M | $128M |
RICK vs DIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
RICK
DIN
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| RCI Hospitality Hol… (RICK) | 100 | 204.0 | +104.0% |
| Dine Brands Global,… (DIN) | 100 | 81.1 | -18.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RICK vs DIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: DIN leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇DIN emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
RICK
RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Play
RICK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -5.5%, EPS growth 272.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.5%
- 188.5% 10Y total return vs DIN's -33.6%
- Lower P/E (4.6x vs 7.5x)
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
DIN
Dine Brands Global, Inc.
The Income Pick
DIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 6.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, current ratio 0.96x
- Beta 0.82, yield 6.3%, current ratio 0.96x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth |  DIN | 8.2% revenue growth vs RICK's -5.5% |
| Value |  RICK | Lower P/E (4.6x vs 7.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | DIN | 1.8% margin vs RICK's -2.3% |
| Stability / Safety | DIN | Beta 0.82 vs RICK's 1.33 |
| Dividends | RICK | 1.0% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs DIN's 6.3% |
| Momentum (1Y) | DIN | +32.7% vs RICK's -27.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | DIN | 0.9% ROA vs RICK's -1.1%, ROIC 9.0% vs 5.5% |
RICK vs DIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
RICK vs DIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLDINLAGGINGRICK
RICKRCI Hospitality Holdi…
1leads
DINDine Brands Global, I…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs RICKMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
DIN4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
RICK4/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
DIN4/6
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
DIN4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
DIN2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $890M annually — 3.2x RICK's $282M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.8% (DIN) to -2.3% (RICK).
| Metric | RICKRCI Hospitality H… | DINDine Brands Globa… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $282M | $890M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $51M | $182M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $39M | $35M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.2% | +39.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +15.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +1.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +3.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.3% | +4.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -111.1% | +7.5% |
DIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
RICK leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.0x trailing earnings, RICK trades at a 25% valuation discount to DIN's 30.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RICK's 8.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DIN's 10.3x.
| Metric | RICKRCI Hospitality H… | DINDine Brands Globa… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $216M | $443M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $449M | $1.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.98x | 30.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.63x | 7.55x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.75x | 10.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.77x | 0.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.96x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.19x | 8.30x |
RICK leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | RICKRCI Hospitality H… | DINDine Brands Globa… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.6% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.1% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.5% | +9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.8% | +10.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.02x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $233M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $34M | $128M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $266M | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.39x | 4.39x |
DIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DIN five years ago would be worth $4,956 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,649 for RICK. Over the past 12 months, DIN leads with a +32.7% total return vs RICK's -27.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DIN at -12.9% vs RICK's -27.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | RICKRCI Hospitality H… | DINDine Brands Globa… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.3% | +3.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.7% | +32.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.3% | -33.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.5% | -50.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +188.5% | -33.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -27.7% | -12.9% |
DIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RICK's 1.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DIN currently trades 86.1% from its 52-week high vs RICK's 68.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | RICKRCI Hospitality H… | DINDine Brands Globa… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.33x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.37 | $39.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.76 | $19.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.3% | +86.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.2 | 62.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 47K | 368K |
DIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — RICK and DIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RICK as "Buy" and DIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 246.7% upside for RICK (target: $98) vs -5.4% for DIN (target: $32). For income investors, DIN offers the higher dividend yield at 6.35% vs RICK's 0.99%.
| Metric | RICKRCI Hospitality H… | DINDine Brands Globa… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $98.00 | $32.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | +6.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.28 | $2.17 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.5% | +13.7% |
Evenly matched — RICK and DIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
DIN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RICK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallDine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
RICK vs DIN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RICK or DIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dine Brands Global, Inc.
(DIN) is the stronger pick with 8. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 5% for RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK). RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK) offers the better valuation at 23. 0x trailing P/E (4. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RICK or DIN?
On trailing P/E, RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc.
(RICK) is the cheapest at 23. 0x versus Dine Brands Global, Inc. at 30. 5x. On forward P/E, RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RICK or DIN?
Over the past 5 years, Dine Brands Global, Inc.
(DIN) delivered a total return of -50. 4%, compared to -53. 5% for RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RICK returned +188. 5% versus DIN's -33. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RICK or DIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Dine Brands Global, Inc.
(DIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 33β — meaning RICK is approximately 63% more volatile than DIN relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — RICK or DIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dine Brands Global, Inc.
(DIN) is pulling ahead at 8. 2% versus -5. 5% for RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 272. 7% year-over-year, compared to -73. 5% for Dine Brands Global, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RICK leads at 1. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RICK or DIN?
RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc.
(RICK) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 9% net margin versus 1. 9% for Dine Brands Global, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DIN leads at 16. 3% versus 13. 0% for RICK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RICK leads at 56. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RICK or DIN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc.
(RICK) trades at 4. 6x forward P/E versus 7. 5x for Dine Brands Global, Inc. — 2. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RICK: 246. 7% to $98. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RICK or DIN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) offers the highest yield at 6. 3%, versus 1. 0% for RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK).
09Is RICK or DIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Dine Brands Global, Inc.
(DIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 6. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DIN: -33. 6%, RICK: +188. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RICK and DIN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RICK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DIN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.