Restaurants
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
RICK vs MODG vs JPM vs PLAY vs BAC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Leisure
Banks - Diversified
Entertainment
Banks - Diversified
RICK vs MODG vs JPM vs PLAY vs BAC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Leisure | Banks - Diversified | Entertainment | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $216M | $2.32B | $908.57B | $416M | $424.14B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $282M | $4.06B | $280.33B | $2.09B | $191.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-1.50B | $57.05B | $-65M | $30.51B |
| Gross Margin | 55.2% | 64.6% | 60.0% | 66.8% | 56.1% |
| Operating Margin | 12.3% | -31.0% | 25.9% | 4.3% | 19.7% |
| Forward P/E | 4.6x | — | 14.6x | 94.6x | 12.6x |
| Total Debt | $266M | $4.14B | $942.38B | $3.17B | $365.90B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $34M | $445M | $343.34B | $17M | $231.84B |
RICK vs MODG vs JPM vs PLAY vs BAC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| RCI Hospitality Hol… (RICK) | 100 | 204.0 | +104.0% |
| Topgolf Callaway Br… (MODG) | 100 | 82.0 | -18.0% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 345.8 | +245.8% |
| Dave & Buster's Ent… (PLAY) | 100 | 89.6 | -10.4% |
| Bank of America Cor… (BAC) | 100 | 236.6 | +136.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RICK vs MODG vs JPM vs PLAY vs BAC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RICK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (4.6x vs 94.6x)
MODG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +50.6% vs PLAY's -62.7%
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 1.5%
- 481.2% 10Y total return vs BAC's 371.6%
- NIM 2.2% vs BAC's 1.8%
- 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs RICK's -5.5%
Among these 5 stocks, PLAY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BAC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 2.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, current ratio 0.42x
- PEG 0.82 vs JPM's 0.83
- Beta 0.83, yield 2.3%, current ratio 0.42x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs RICK's -5.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.6x vs 94.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs MODG's -37.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs MODG's 1.92, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +50.6% vs PLAY's -62.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.3% ROA vs MODG's -19.9%, ROIC 4.5% vs -13.8% |
RICK vs MODG vs JPM vs PLAY vs BAC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RICK vs MODG vs JPM vs PLAY vs BAC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories
RICK leads 2 • BAC leads 1 • MODG leads 0 • PLAY leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 995.4x RICK's $282M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MODG's -37.1%. On growth, RICK holds the edge at +4.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $282M | $4.1B | $280.3B | $2.1B | $191.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $51M | -$989M | $81.4B | $377M | $40.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$1.5B | $57.0B | -$65M | $30.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $39M | $35M | $100.9B | -$33M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.2% | +64.6% | +60.0% | +66.8% | +56.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | -31.0% | +25.9% | +4.3% | +19.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | -37.1% | +20.4% | -3.1% | +15.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +0.8% | +36.0% | -1.6% | +6.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.3% | -7.8% | — | -1.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -111.1% | -3.1% | +16.0% | -74.2% | +18.3% |
Valuation Metrics
RICK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, BAC trades at a 36% valuation discount to RICK's 23.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.92x vs BAC's 0.96x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $216M | $2.3B | $908.6B | $416M | $424.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $449M | $6.0B | $1.51T | $3.6B | $558.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.98x | -1.60x | 16.22x | -8.54x | 14.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.63x | — | 14.60x | 94.62x | 12.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.92x | — | 0.96x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.75x | — | 18.52x | 9.27x | 13.95x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.77x | 0.55x | 3.25x | 0.20x | 2.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.96x | 0.96x | 2.51x | 4.54x | 1.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.19x | 26.73x | 9.01x | — | 33.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RICK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-61 for MODG. RICK carries lower financial leverage with a 1.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLAY's 34.71x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BAC scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.6% | -60.8% | +15.9% | -53.1% | +10.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.1% | -19.9% | +1.3% | -1.6% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.5% | -13.8% | +4.5% | +2.4% | +3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.8% | -16.8% | +8.9% | +2.9% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.02x | 1.72x | 2.60x | 34.71x | 1.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $233M | $3.7B | $599.0B | $3.1B | $134.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $34M | $445M | $343.3B | $17M | $231.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $266M | $4.1B | $942.4B | $3.2B | $365.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.39x | -5.38x | 0.74x | 0.46x | 0.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $23,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,012 for PLAY. Over the past 12 months, MODG leads with a +50.6% total return vs PLAY's -62.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.7% vs PLAY's -34.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.3% | +7.4% | +0.8% | -29.9% | +1.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.7% | +50.6% | +20.9% | -62.7% | +27.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.3% | -33.8% | +138.8% | -71.6% | +105.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.5% | -60.6% | +135.5% | -69.9% | +57.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +188.5% | +23.1% | +481.2% | -73.0% | +371.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -27.7% | -12.9% | +33.7% | -34.3% | +27.1% |
Risk & Volatility
BAC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BAC is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MODG's 1.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BAC currently trades 96.9% from its 52-week high vs PLAY's 33.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.33x | 1.92x | 0.87x | 1.80x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.37 | $16.65 | $338.09 | $35.53 | $57.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.76 | $7.84 | $269.72 | $9.65 | $44.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.3% | +75.6% | +96.2% | +33.6% | +96.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.2 | 57.2 | 72.1 | 44.2 | 70.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 47K | 9.2M | 7.4M | 1.8M | 32.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — JPM and BAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RICK as "Buy", MODG as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", PLAY as "Buy", BAC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 246.7% upside for RICK (target: $98) vs 4.5% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, BAC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.25% vs RICK's 0.99%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $98.00 | $16.50 | $339.75 | $17.33 | $61.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 23 | 61 | 20 | 54 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | — | +1.8% | — | +2.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.28 | — | $5.95 | — | $1.27 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.5% | +1.4% | +3.8% | +0.4% | +5.1% |
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). RICK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
RICK vs MODG vs JPM vs PLAY vs BAC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RICK or MODG or JPM or PLAY or BAC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 5% for RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK). Bank of America Corporation (BAC) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (12. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RICK or MODG or JPM or PLAY or BAC?
On trailing P/E, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the cheapest at 14.
7x versus RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. at 23. 0x. On forward P/E, RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bank of America Corporation wins at 0. 82x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 83x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RICK or MODG or JPM or PLAY or BAC?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +135. 5%, compared to -69. 9% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus PLAY's -73. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RICK or MODG or JPM or PLAY or BAC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
83β versus Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. 's 1. 92β — meaning MODG is approximately 133% more volatile than BAC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 102% versus 35% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RICK or MODG or JPM or PLAY or BAC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -5. 5% for RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 272. 7% year-over-year, compared to -1776. 6% for Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MODG leads at 10. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RICK or MODG or JPM or PLAY or BAC?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -34. 1% for Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -29. 7% for MODG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLAY leads at 85. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RICK or MODG or JPM or PLAY or BAC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 82x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 83x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK) trades at 4. 6x forward P/E versus 94. 6x for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. — 90. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RICK: 246. 7% to $98. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RICK or MODG or JPM or PLAY or BAC?
In this comparison, BAC (2.
3% yield), JPM (1. 8% yield), RICK (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. MODG, PLAY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RICK or MODG or JPM or PLAY or BAC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 1. 8% yield, +481. 2% 10Y return). Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. (MODG) carries a higher beta of 1. 92 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +481. 2%, MODG: +23. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RICK and MODG and JPM and PLAY and BAC?
These companies operate in different sectors (RICK (Consumer Cyclical) and MODG (Consumer Cyclical) and JPM (Financial Services) and PLAY (Communication Services) and BAC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RICK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MODG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; PLAY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BAC is a large-cap deep-value stock. RICK, JPM, BAC pay a dividend while MODG, PLAY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.