Restaurants
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
RICK vs MODG vs PLAY vs GOLF vs PLNT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Leisure
Entertainment
Leisure
Leisure
RICK vs MODG vs PLAY vs GOLF vs PLNT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Leisure | Entertainment | Leisure | Leisure |
| Market Cap | $216M | $2.32B | $416M | $6.31B | $4.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $282M | $4.06B | $2.09B | $2.61B | $1.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-1.50B | $-65M | $171M | $229M |
| Gross Margin | 55.2% | 64.6% | 66.8% | 47.5% | 42.6% |
| Operating Margin | 12.3% | -31.0% | 4.3% | 11.5% | 29.7% |
| Forward P/E | 4.6x | — | 94.6x | 28.7x | 16.6x |
| Total Debt | $266M | $4.14B | $3.17B | $1.07B | $443M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $34M | $445M | $17M | $50M | $346M |
RICK vs MODG vs PLAY vs GOLF vs PLNT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| RCI Hospitality Hol… (RICK) | 100 | 204.0 | +104.0% |
| Topgolf Callaway Br… (MODG) | 100 | 82.0 | -18.0% |
| Dave & Buster's Ent… (PLAY) | 100 | 89.6 | -10.4% |
| Acushnet Holdings C… (GOLF) | 100 | 309.7 | +209.7% |
| Planet Fitness, Inc. (PLNT) | 100 | 87.5 | -12.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RICK vs MODG vs PLAY vs GOLF vs PLNT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RICK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 1.33, yield 1.0%
- Lower P/E (4.6x vs 16.6x)
- 1.0% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs GOLF's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
MODG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, PLAY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GOLF ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 5.4% 10Y total return vs RICK's 188.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.86, current ratio 2.38x
- Beta 0.86, yield 0.9%, current ratio 2.38x
- +52.2% vs PLAY's -62.7%
PLNT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 12.1%, EPS growth 31.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.2%
- 12.1% revenue growth vs RICK's -5.5%
- 16.5% margin vs MODG's -37.1%
- Beta 0.45 vs MODG's 1.92
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.1% revenue growth vs RICK's -5.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.6x vs 16.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.5% margin vs MODG's -37.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.45 vs MODG's 1.92 | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs GOLF's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.2% vs PLAY's -62.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.4% ROA vs MODG's -19.9%, ROIC 35.2% vs -13.8% |
RICK vs MODG vs PLAY vs GOLF vs PLNT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RICK vs MODG vs PLAY vs GOLF vs PLNT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PLNT leads in 2 of 6 categories
RICK leads 1 • GOLF leads 1 • MODG leads 0 • PLAY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLNT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MODG is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 14.4x RICK's $282M. PLNT is the more profitable business, keeping 16.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MODG's -37.1%. On growth, PLNT holds the edge at +21.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $282M | $4.1B | $2.1B | $2.6B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $51M | -$989M | $377M | $342M | $568M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$1.5B | -$65M | $171M | $229M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $39M | $35M | -$33M | $89M | $267M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.2% | +64.6% | +66.8% | +47.5% | +42.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | -31.0% | +4.3% | +11.5% | +29.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | -37.1% | -3.1% | +6.5% | +16.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +0.8% | -1.6% | +3.4% | +19.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.3% | -7.8% | -1.5% | +7.1% | +21.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -111.1% | -3.1% | -74.2% | -16.0% | +30.0% |
Valuation Metrics
RICK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.2x trailing earnings, PLNT trades at a 42% valuation discount to GOLF's 34.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PLNT's 7.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GOLF's 20.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $216M | $2.3B | $416M | $6.3B | $4.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $449M | $6.0B | $3.6B | $7.3B | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.98x | -1.60x | -8.54x | 34.75x | 20.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.63x | — | 94.62x | 28.70x | 16.55x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.80x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.75x | — | 9.27x | 20.92x | 7.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.77x | 0.55x | 0.20x | 2.47x | 3.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.96x | 0.96x | 4.54x | 8.21x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.19x | 26.73x | — | 52.55x | 16.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PLNT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOLF delivers a 20.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-61 for MODG. RICK carries lower financial leverage with a 1.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLAY's 34.71x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLNT scores 9/9 vs GOLF's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.6% | -60.8% | -53.1% | +20.8% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.1% | -19.9% | -1.6% | +7.0% | +7.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.5% | -13.8% | +2.4% | +13.3% | +35.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.8% | -16.8% | +2.9% | +16.3% | +14.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.02x | 1.72x | 34.71x | 1.37x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $233M | $3.7B | $3.1B | $1.0B | $97M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $34M | $445M | $17M | $50M | $346M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $266M | $4.1B | $3.2B | $1.1B | $443M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.39x | -5.38x | 0.46x | 3.17x | 3.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOLF leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOLF five years ago would be worth $23,581 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,012 for PLAY. Over the past 12 months, GOLF leads with a +52.2% total return vs PLAY's -62.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOLF at 29.9% vs PLAY's -34.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.3% | +7.4% | -29.9% | +31.8% | -51.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.7% | +50.6% | -62.7% | +52.2% | -50.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.3% | -33.8% | -71.6% | +119.0% | -21.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.5% | -60.6% | -69.9% | +135.8% | -28.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +188.5% | +23.1% | -73.0% | +537.2% | +186.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -27.7% | -12.9% | -34.3% | +29.9% | -7.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GOLF and PLNT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PLNT is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MODG's 1.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOLF currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs PLAY's 33.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.33x | 1.92x | 1.80x | 0.86x | 0.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.37 | $16.65 | $35.53 | $108.66 | $114.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.76 | $7.84 | $9.65 | $70.28 | $37.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.3% | +75.6% | +33.6% | +99.1% | +46.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.2 | 57.2 | 44.2 | 69.6 | 37.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 47K | 9.2M | 1.8M | 299K | 2.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — RICK and GOLF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RICK as "Buy", MODG as "Buy", PLAY as "Buy", GOLF as "Hold", PLNT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 246.7% upside for RICK (target: $98) vs -12.0% for GOLF (target: $95). For income investors, RICK offers the higher dividend yield at 0.99% vs GOLF's 0.87%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $98.00 | $16.50 | $17.33 | $94.75 | $77.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 23 | 20 | 21 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | — | — | +0.9% | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.28 | — | — | $0.94 | $0.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.5% | +1.4% | +0.4% | +3.4% | +11.9% |
PLNT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RICK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
RICK vs MODG vs PLAY vs GOLF vs PLNT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RICK or MODG or PLAY or GOLF or PLNT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Planet Fitness, Inc.
(PLNT) is the stronger pick with 12. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 5% for RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK). Planet Fitness, Inc. (PLNT) offers the better valuation at 20. 2x trailing P/E (16. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RICK or MODG or PLAY or GOLF or PLNT?
On trailing P/E, Planet Fitness, Inc.
(PLNT) is the cheapest at 20. 2x versus Acushnet Holdings Corp. at 34. 8x. On forward P/E, RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RICK or MODG or PLAY or GOLF or PLNT?
Over the past 5 years, Acushnet Holdings Corp.
(GOLF) delivered a total return of +135. 8%, compared to -69. 9% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOLF returned +537. 2% versus PLAY's -73. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RICK or MODG or PLAY or GOLF or PLNT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Planet Fitness, Inc.
(PLNT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. 's 1. 92β — meaning MODG is approximately 330% more volatile than PLNT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 102% versus 35% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RICK or MODG or PLAY or GOLF or PLNT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Planet Fitness, Inc.
(PLNT) is pulling ahead at 12. 1% versus -5. 5% for RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 272. 7% year-over-year, compared to -1776. 6% for Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLNT leads at 12. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RICK or MODG or PLAY or GOLF or PLNT?
Planet Fitness, Inc.
(PLNT) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 5% net margin versus -34. 1% for Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. — meaning it keeps 16. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLNT leads at 29. 8% versus -29. 7% for MODG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLAY leads at 85. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RICK or MODG or PLAY or GOLF or PLNT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc.
(RICK) trades at 4. 6x forward P/E versus 94. 6x for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. — 90. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RICK: 246. 7% to $98. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RICK or MODG or PLAY or GOLF or PLNT?
In this comparison, RICK (1.
0% yield), GOLF (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. MODG, PLAY, PLNT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RICK or MODG or PLAY or GOLF or PLNT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Acushnet Holdings Corp.
(GOLF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 86), 0. 9% yield, +537. 2% 10Y return). Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. (MODG) carries a higher beta of 1. 92 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOLF: +537. 2%, MODG: +23. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RICK and MODG and PLAY and GOLF and PLNT?
These companies operate in different sectors (RICK (Consumer Cyclical) and MODG (Consumer Cyclical) and PLAY (Communication Services) and GOLF (Consumer Cyclical) and PLNT (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
RICK, GOLF pay a dividend while MODG, PLAY, PLNT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.