Restaurants
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
RICK vs PLAY vs MODG vs GOLF vs TXRH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Leisure
Leisure
Restaurants
RICK vs PLAY vs MODG vs GOLF vs TXRH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Entertainment | Leisure | Leisure | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $216M | $416M | $2.32B | $6.31B | $11.68B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $282M | $2.09B | $4.06B | $2.61B | $6.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-65M | $-1.50B | $171M | $415M |
| Gross Margin | 55.2% | 66.8% | 64.6% | 47.5% | 14.0% |
| Operating Margin | 12.3% | 4.3% | -31.0% | 11.5% | 8.3% |
| Forward P/E | 4.6x | 94.6x | — | 28.7x | 27.7x |
| Total Debt | $266M | $3.17B | $4.14B | $1.07B | $1.89B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $34M | $17M | $445M | $50M | $135M |
RICK vs PLAY vs MODG vs GOLF vs TXRH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| RCI Hospitality Hol… (RICK) | 100 | 204.0 | +104.0% |
| Dave & Buster's Ent… (PLAY) | 100 | 89.6 | -10.4% |
| Topgolf Callaway Br… (MODG) | 100 | 82.0 | -18.0% |
| Acushnet Holdings C… (GOLF) | 100 | 309.7 | +209.7% |
| Texas Roadhouse, In… (TXRH) | 100 | 338.1 | +238.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RICK vs PLAY vs MODG vs GOLF vs TXRH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RICK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (4.6x vs 28.7x)
PLAY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, MODG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GOLF ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 5.4% 10Y total return vs TXRH's 322.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.86, current ratio 2.38x
- +52.2% vs PLAY's -62.7%
TXRH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.42, yield 1.5%
- Rev growth 9.4%, EPS growth -5.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.5%
- PEG 0.40 vs GOLF's 1.48
- Beta 0.42, yield 1.5%, current ratio 0.50x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.4% revenue growth vs RICK's -5.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.6x vs 28.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.8% margin vs MODG's -37.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs MODG's 1.92, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs RICK's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.2% vs PLAY's -62.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.2% ROA vs MODG's -19.9%, ROIC 14.5% vs -13.8% |
RICK vs PLAY vs MODG vs GOLF vs TXRH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RICK vs PLAY vs MODG vs GOLF vs TXRH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TXRH leads in 2 of 6 categories
RICK leads 1 • GOLF leads 1 • PLAY leads 0 • MODG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXRH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXRH is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 21.5x RICK's $282M. TXRH is the more profitable business, keeping 6.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MODG's -37.1%. On growth, TXRH holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $282M | $2.1B | $4.1B | $2.6B | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $51M | $377M | -$989M | $342M | $716M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$65M | -$1.5B | $171M | $415M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $39M | -$33M | $35M | $89M | $361M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.2% | +66.8% | +64.6% | +47.5% | +14.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +4.3% | -31.0% | +11.5% | +8.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | -3.1% | -37.1% | +6.5% | +6.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | -1.6% | +0.8% | +3.4% | +5.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.3% | -1.5% | -7.8% | +7.1% | +12.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -111.1% | -74.2% | -3.1% | -16.0% | +10.0% |
Valuation Metrics
RICK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.0x trailing earnings, RICK trades at a 34% valuation discount to GOLF's 34.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TXRH offers better value at 0.43x vs GOLF's 1.80x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $216M | $416M | $2.3B | $6.3B | $11.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $449M | $3.6B | $6.0B | $7.3B | $13.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.98x | -8.54x | -1.60x | 34.75x | 29.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.63x | 94.62x | — | 28.70x | 27.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.80x | 0.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.75x | 9.27x | — | 20.92x | 18.94x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.77x | 0.20x | 0.55x | 2.47x | 1.99x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.96x | 4.54x | 0.96x | 8.21x | 7.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.19x | — | 26.73x | 52.55x | 34.16x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — RICK and TXRH each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TXRH delivers a 27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-61 for MODG. RICK carries lower financial leverage with a 1.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLAY's 34.71x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RICK scores 6/9 vs TXRH's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.6% | -53.1% | -60.8% | +20.8% | +27.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.1% | -1.6% | -19.9% | +7.0% | +12.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.5% | +2.4% | -13.8% | +13.3% | +14.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.8% | +2.9% | -16.8% | +16.3% | +20.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.02x | 34.71x | 1.72x | 1.37x | 1.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $233M | $3.1B | $3.7B | $1.0B | $1.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $34M | $17M | $445M | $50M | $135M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $266M | $3.2B | $4.1B | $1.1B | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.39x | 0.46x | -5.38x | 3.17x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOLF leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOLF five years ago would be worth $23,581 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,012 for PLAY. Over the past 12 months, GOLF leads with a +52.2% total return vs PLAY's -62.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOLF at 29.9% vs PLAY's -34.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.3% | -29.9% | +7.4% | +31.8% | +4.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.7% | -62.7% | +50.6% | +52.2% | -6.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.3% | -71.6% | -33.8% | +119.0% | +71.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.5% | -69.9% | -60.6% | +135.8% | +109.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +188.5% | -73.0% | +23.1% | +537.2% | +322.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -27.7% | -34.3% | -12.9% | +29.9% | +19.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GOLF and TXRH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TXRH is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MODG's 1.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOLF currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs PLAY's 33.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.33x | 1.80x | 1.92x | 0.86x | 0.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.37 | $35.53 | $16.65 | $108.66 | $197.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.76 | $9.65 | $7.84 | $70.28 | $153.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.3% | +33.6% | +75.6% | +99.1% | +90.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.2 | 44.2 | 57.2 | 69.6 | 54.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 47K | 1.8M | 9.2M | 299K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
TXRH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RICK as "Buy", PLAY as "Buy", MODG as "Buy", GOLF as "Hold", TXRH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 246.7% upside for RICK (target: $98) vs -12.0% for GOLF (target: $95). For income investors, TXRH offers the higher dividend yield at 1.52% vs GOLF's 0.87%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $98.00 | $17.33 | $16.50 | $94.75 | $191.46 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 20 | 23 | 21 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | — | — | +0.9% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.28 | — | — | $0.94 | $2.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.5% | +0.4% | +1.4% | +3.4% | +1.3% |
TXRH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). RICK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
RICK vs PLAY vs MODG vs GOLF vs TXRH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RICK or PLAY or MODG or GOLF or TXRH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is the stronger pick with 9. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 5% for RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK). RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK) offers the better valuation at 23. 0x trailing P/E (4. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RICK or PLAY or MODG or GOLF or TXRH?
On trailing P/E, RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc.
(RICK) is the cheapest at 23. 0x versus Acushnet Holdings Corp. at 34. 8x. On forward P/E, RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Texas Roadhouse, Inc. wins at 0. 40x versus Acushnet Holdings Corp. 's 1. 48x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RICK or PLAY or MODG or GOLF or TXRH?
Over the past 5 years, Acushnet Holdings Corp.
(GOLF) delivered a total return of +135. 8%, compared to -69. 9% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOLF returned +537. 2% versus PLAY's -73. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RICK or PLAY or MODG or GOLF or TXRH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 42β versus Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. 's 1. 92β — meaning MODG is approximately 355% more volatile than TXRH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 102% versus 35% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RICK or PLAY or MODG or GOLF or TXRH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is pulling ahead at 9. 4% versus -5. 5% for RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 272. 7% year-over-year, compared to -1776. 6% for Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TXRH leads at 13. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RICK or PLAY or MODG or GOLF or TXRH?
Acushnet Holdings Corp.
(GOLF) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 4% net margin versus -34. 1% for Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. — meaning it keeps 7. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RICK leads at 13. 0% versus -29. 7% for MODG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLAY leads at 85. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RICK or PLAY or MODG or GOLF or TXRH more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 40x versus Acushnet Holdings Corp. 's 1. 48x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK) trades at 4. 6x forward P/E versus 94. 6x for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. — 90. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RICK: 246. 7% to $98. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RICK or PLAY or MODG or GOLF or TXRH?
In this comparison, TXRH (1.
5% yield), RICK (1. 0% yield), GOLF (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. PLAY, MODG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RICK or PLAY or MODG or GOLF or TXRH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 42), 1. 5% yield, +322. 4% 10Y return). Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. (MODG) carries a higher beta of 1. 92 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXRH: +322. 4%, MODG: +23. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RICK and PLAY and MODG and GOLF and TXRH?
These companies operate in different sectors (RICK (Consumer Cyclical) and PLAY (Communication Services) and MODG (Consumer Cyclical) and GOLF (Consumer Cyclical) and TXRH (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
RICK, GOLF, TXRH pay a dividend while PLAY, MODG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.