ROLR
High Roller Technologies, Inc.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Market Cap$57M
5Y Perf.—
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisROLR
PENN
CZR
GENI
Try popular comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ROLR vs PENN vs CZR vs GENI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
PENN
PENN Entertainment, Inc.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Market Cap$2.90B
5Y Perf.+16.4%
CZR
Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Market Cap$6.01B
5Y Perf.-21.7%
GENI
Genius Sports Limited
Internet Content & Information
Market Cap$1.76B
5Y Perf.-10.1%
ROLR vs PENN vs CZR vs GENI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot |  ROLR |  PENN |  CZR |  GENI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $57M | $2.90B | $6.01B | $1.76B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17M | $6.96B | $11.56B | $713M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $-843M | $-485M | $-159M |
| Gross Margin | 49.6% | 30.6% | 43.9% | 22.6% |
| Operating Margin | -34.5% | -7.9% | 17.8% | -18.3% |
| Forward P/E | 17.6x | 29.1x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $807K | $8.38B | $26.34B | $30M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $687M | $887M | $281M |
ROLR vs PENN vs CZR vs GENI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ROLR
PENN
CZR
GENI
| Stock | Aug 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Roller Technol… (ROLR) | 100 | Infinity | +Infinity% |
| PENN Entertainment,… (PENN) | 100 | 116.4 | +16.4% |
| Caesars Entertainme… (CZR) | 100 | 78.3 | -21.7% |
| Genius Sports Limit… (GENI) | 100 | 89.9 | -10.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ROLR vs PENN vs CZR vs GENI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ROLR leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Caesars Entertainment, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. GENI also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇ROLR emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
ROLR
High Roller Technologies, Inc.
The Value Play
ROLR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- 5.9% margin vs GENI's -22.3%
- +137.8% vs GENI's -34.6%
- 4.6% ROA vs GENI's -15.4%, ROIC -119.9% vs -16.6%
Best for: value and quality
PENN
PENN Entertainment, Inc.
The Secondary Option
PENN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
CZR
Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
CZR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and defensive is your priority.
- 265.0% 10Y total return vs GENI's -31.5%
- Beta 1.01, current ratio 0.80x
- Beta 1.01 vs ROLR's 2.73
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
GENI
Genius Sports Limited
The Income Pick
GENI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.59
- Rev growth 31.0%, EPS growth -63.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.59, Low D/E 4.2%, current ratio 1.56x
- 31.0% revenue growth vs ROLR's -26.6%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth |  GENI | 31.0% revenue growth vs ROLR's -26.6% |
| Value |  ROLR | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | ROLR | 5.9% margin vs GENI's -22.3% |
| Stability / Safety |  CZR | Beta 1.01 vs ROLR's 2.73 |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | ROLR | +137.8% vs GENI's -34.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ROLR | 4.6% ROA vs GENI's -15.4%, ROIC -119.9% vs -16.6% |
ROLR vs PENN vs CZR vs GENI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
ROLR vs PENN vs CZR vs GENI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCZRLAGGINGPENN
Who Leads Where
CZR leads in 2 of 6 categories
GENI leads 2 • ROLR leads 0 • PENN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓PENNPENN Entertainment, I…
0leads
ROLRHigh Roller Technolog…
0leads
GENIGenius Sports Limited
2leads
CZRCaesars Entertainment…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs GENIvs ROLRMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CZR3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CZR4/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
GENI3/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
GENI1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ROLR and CZR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CZR is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 678.2x ROLR's $17M. ROLR is the more profitable business, keeping 5.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GENI's -22.3%. On growth, GENI holds the edge at +30.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ROLRHigh Roller Techn… |  PENNPENN Entertainmen… | CZRCaesars Entertain… | GENIGenius Sports Lim… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17M | $7.0B | $11.6B | $713M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | -$105M | $3.5B | -$54M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1M | -$843M | -$485M | -$159M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$169M | $538M | $16M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.6% | +30.6% | +43.9% | +22.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -34.5% | -7.9% | +17.8% | -18.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | -12.1% | -4.2% | -22.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -17.2% | -2.4% | +4.7% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -50.3% | +8.2% | +2.7% | +30.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.6% | +37.5% | +11.1% | -6.0% |
Evenly matched — ROLR and CZR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CZR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CZR's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PENN's 14.7x.
| Metric | ROLRHigh Roller Techn… | PENNPENN Entertainmen… | CZRCaesars Entertain… | GENIGenius Sports Lim… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $57M | $2.9B | $6.0B | $1.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $56M | $10.6B | $31.5B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.64x | -3.72x | -12.19x | -15.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 29.09x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.16x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.72x | 9.00x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.78x | 0.42x | 0.52x | 2.63x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.36x | 1.72x | 1.66x | 2.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 11.55x | 27.33x |
CZR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CZR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ROLR delivers a 7.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-35 for PENN. GENI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CZR's 7.15x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PENN scores 5/9 vs GENI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ROLRHigh Roller Techn… | PENNPENN Entertainmen… | CZRCaesars Entertain… | GENIGenius Sports Lim… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.9% | -34.7% | -12.6% | -22.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.6% | -5.7% | -1.5% | -15.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -119.9% | +1.8% | +5.4% | -16.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -63.7% | +2.0% | +7.0% | -15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 4.58x | 7.15x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $7.7B | $25.5B | -$250M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $687M | $887M | $281M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $807,000 | $8.4B | $26.3B | $30M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -17.49x | -1.02x | 0.90x | -75.96x |
CZR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GENI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GENI five years ago would be worth $3,776 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,688 for PENN. Over the past 12 months, ROLR leads with a +137.8% total return vs GENI's -34.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GENI at 4.3% vs CZR's -16.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ROLRHigh Roller Techn… | PENNPENN Entertainmen… | CZRCaesars Entertain… | GENIGenius Sports Lim… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +190.0% | +46.0% | +25.2% | -36.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +137.8% | +31.6% | +8.0% | -34.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -19.0% | -40.7% | +13.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -73.1% | -72.3% | -62.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +60.7% | +265.0% | -31.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | -6.8% | -16.0% | +4.3% |
GENI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PENN and CZR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZR is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ROLR's 2.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PENN currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs ROLR's 18.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ROLRHigh Roller Techn… | PENNPENN Entertainmen… | CZRCaesars Entertain… | GENIGenius Sports Lim… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.73x | 1.17x | 1.01x | 1.59x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.68 | $21.94 | $31.58 | $13.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.16 | $11.65 | $17.95 | $3.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +18.9% | +98.8% | +93.4% | +49.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.9 | 71.1 | 65.2 | 73.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.7M | 3.7M | 6.2M | 5.4M |
Evenly matched — PENN and CZR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
GENI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PENN as "Buy", CZR as "Hold", GENI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 37.2% upside for GENI (target: $9) vs -5.1% for PENN (target: $21).
| Metric | ROLRHigh Roller Techn… | PENNPENN Entertainmen… | CZRCaesars Entertain… | GENIGenius Sports Lim… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $20.57 | $30.11 | $9.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 47 | 31 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +12.2% | +3.8% | 0.0% |
GENI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
CZR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). GENI leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
Best OverallCaesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ROLR vs PENN vs CZR vs GENI: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ROLR or PENN or CZR or GENI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) is the stronger pick with 31.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -26. 6% for High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR). High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR) offers the better valuation at 17. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN) a "Buy" — based on 47 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ROLR or PENN or CZR or GENI?
Over the past 5 years, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) delivered a total return of -62.
2%, compared to -73. 1% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZR returned +265. 0% versus GENI's -31. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ROLR or PENN or CZR or GENI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
(CZR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus High Roller Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 73β — meaning ROLR is approximately 169% more volatile than CZR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 7% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ROLR or PENN or CZR or GENI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Genius Sports Limited (GENI) is pulling ahead at 31.
0% versus -26. 6% for High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: High Roller Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 143. 9% year-over-year, compared to -184. 4% for PENN Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GENI leads at 25. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ROLR or PENN or CZR or GENI?
High Roller Technologies, Inc.
(ROLR) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 4% net margin versus -16. 7% for Genius Sports Limited — meaning it keeps 3. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CZR leads at 18. 1% versus -27. 8% for ROLR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ROLR leads at 53. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ROLR or PENN or CZR or GENI more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GENI: 37.
2% to $9. 40.
07Which pays a better dividend — ROLR or PENN or CZR or GENI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is ROLR or PENN or CZR or GENI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
(CZR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 01), +265. 0% 10Y return). High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR) carries a higher beta of 2. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ROLR and PENN and CZR and GENI?
These companies operate in different sectors (ROLR (Consumer Cyclical) and PENN (Consumer Cyclical) and CZR (Consumer Cyclical) and GENI (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ROLR is a small-cap deep-value stock; PENN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CZR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GENI is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.