Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
ROLR logo
ROLR
PENN logo
PENN
CZR logo
CZR
GENI logo
GENI
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ROLR vs PENN vs CZR vs GENI vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ROLR
High Roller Technologies, Inc.

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

Consumer CyclicalAMEX • US
Market Cap$57M
5Y Perf.
PENN
PENN Entertainment, Inc.

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.90B
5Y Perf.+16.4%
CZR
Caesars Entertainment, Inc.

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.01B
5Y Perf.-21.7%
GENI
Genius Sports Limited

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNYSE • GB
Market Cap$1.76B
5Y Perf.-10.1%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+42.7%

ROLR vs PENN vs CZR vs GENI vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ROLR logoROLR
PENN logoPENN
CZR logoCZR
GENI logoGENI
JPM logoJPM
IndustryGambling, Resorts & CasinosGambling, Resorts & CasinosGambling, Resorts & CasinosInternet Content & InformationBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$57M$2.90B$6.01B$1.76B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$17M$6.96B$11.56B$713M$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$1M$-843M$-485M$-159M$57.05B
Gross Margin49.6%30.6%43.9%22.6%60.0%
Operating Margin-34.5%-7.9%17.8%-18.3%25.9%
Forward P/E17.6x29.1x14.4x
Total Debt$807K$8.38B$26.34B$30M$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$2M$687M$887M$281M$343.34B

ROLR vs PENN vs CZR vs GENI vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ROLR
PENN
CZR
GENI
JPM
StockAug 24Jun 26Return
High Roller Technol… (ROLR)100Infinity+Infinity%
PENN Entertainment,… (PENN)100116.4+16.4%
Caesars Entertainme… (CZR)10078.3-21.7%
Genius Sports Limit… (GENI)10089.9-10.1%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100142.7+42.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ROLR vs PENN vs CZR vs GENI vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. High Roller Technologies, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment and operational efficiency and capital deployment. GENI also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
ROLR
High Roller Technologies, Inc.
The Value Pick

ROLR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • PEG 0.16 vs JPM's 0.81
  • +137.8% vs GENI's -34.6%
  • 4.6% ROA vs GENI's -15.4%, ROIC -119.9% vs -16.6%
Best for: valuation efficiency
PENN
PENN Entertainment, Inc.
The Consumer Cyclical Pick

PENN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
CZR
Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

CZR is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 1.01, current ratio 0.80x
Best for: defensive
GENI
Genius Sports Limited
The Growth Play

GENI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 31.0%, EPS growth -63.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.59, Low D/E 4.2%, current ratio 1.56x
  • 31.0% revenue growth vs ROLR's -26.6%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs CZR's 265.0%
  • Better valuation composite
  • 20.4% margin vs GENI's -22.3%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGENI logoGENI31.0% revenue growth vs ROLR's -26.6%
ValueJPM logoJPMBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs GENI's -22.3%
Stability / SafetyJPM logoJPMBeta 0.94 vs ROLR's 2.73
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ROLR logoROLR+137.8% vs GENI's -34.6%
Efficiency (ROA)ROLR logoROLR4.6% ROA vs GENI's -15.4%, ROIC -119.9% vs -16.6%

ROLR vs PENN vs CZR vs GENI vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ROLRHigh Roller Technologies, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

PENNPENN Entertainment, Inc.
FY 2025
Casino
76.9%$5.3B
Product and Service, Other
13.1%$912M
Food and Beverage
6.4%$446M
Occupancy
3.6%$253M
CZRCaesars Entertainment, Inc.
FY 2025
Casino
64.4%$6.6B
Hotel, Owned
18.9%$1.9B
Food and Beverage
16.7%$1.7B
GENIGenius Sports Limited
FY 2025
Betting Technology Content And Services
70.4%$472M
Media Technology Content And Services
21.6%$144M
Sports Technology And Services
8.0%$53M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

ROLR vs PENN vs CZR vs GENI vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGGENI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 16443.7x ROLR's $17M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GENI's -22.3%. On growth, GENI holds the edge at +30.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricROLR logoROLRHigh Roller Techn…PENN logoPENNPENN Entertainmen…CZR logoCZRCaesars Entertain…GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$17M$7.0B$11.6B$713M$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$6M-$105M$3.5B-$54M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1M-$843M-$485M-$159M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$3M-$169M$538M$16M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+49.6%+30.6%+43.9%+22.6%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-34.5%-7.9%+17.8%-18.3%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+5.9%-12.1%-4.2%-22.3%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-17.2%-2.4%+4.7%+2.2%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-50.3%+8.2%+2.7%+30.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+25.6%+37.5%+11.1%-6.0%+16.0%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — CZR and JPM each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 9% valuation discount to ROLR's 17.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ROLR offers better value at 0.16x vs JPM's 0.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricROLR logoROLRHigh Roller Techn…PENN logoPENNPENN Entertainmen…CZR logoCZRCaesars Entertain…GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$57M$2.9B$6.0B$1.8B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$56M$10.6B$31.5B$1.5B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS17.64x-3.72x-12.19x-15.57x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.29.09x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.16x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.72x9.00x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.78x0.42x0.52x2.63x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share6.36x1.72x1.66x2.41x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.55x27.33x8.88x
Evenly matched — CZR and JPM each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — CZR and JPM each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-35 for PENN. GENI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CZR's 7.15x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PENN scores 5/9 vs GENI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricROLR logoROLRHigh Roller Techn…PENN logoPENNPENN Entertainmen…CZR logoCZRCaesars Entertain…GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.9%-34.7%-12.6%-22.2%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.6%-5.7%-1.5%-15.4%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-119.9%+1.8%+5.4%-16.6%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-63.7%+2.0%+7.0%-15.3%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–935535
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.08x4.58x7.15x0.04x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$1M$7.7B$25.5B-$250M$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2M$687M$887M$281M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$807,000$8.4B$26.3B$30M$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-17.49x-1.02x0.90x-75.96x0.74x
Evenly matched — CZR and JPM each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,688 for PENN. Over the past 12 months, ROLR leads with a +137.8% total return vs GENI's -34.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs CZR's -16.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricROLR logoROLRHigh Roller Techn…PENN logoPENNPENN Entertainmen…CZR logoCZRCaesars Entertain…GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+190.0%+46.0%+25.2%-36.5%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+137.8%+31.6%+8.0%-34.6%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-19.0%-40.7%+13.4%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-73.1%-72.3%-62.2%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+60.7%+265.0%-31.5%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-6.8%-16.0%+4.3%+33.6%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PENN and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ROLR's 2.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PENN currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs ROLR's 18.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricROLR logoROLRHigh Roller Techn…PENN logoPENNPENN Entertainmen…CZR logoCZRCaesars Entertain…GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.73x1.17x1.01x1.59x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$33.68$21.94$31.58$13.73$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.16$11.65$17.95$3.83$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+18.9%+98.8%+93.4%+49.9%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10060.971.165.273.259.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.7M3.7M6.2M5.4M7.0M
Evenly matched — PENN and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: PENN as "Buy", CZR as "Hold", GENI as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 37.2% upside for GENI (target: $9) vs -5.1% for PENN (target: $21). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricROLR logoROLRHigh Roller Techn…PENN logoPENNPENN Entertainmen…CZR logoCZRCaesars Entertain…GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$20.57$30.11$9.40$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts47311961
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00115
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+12.2%+3.8%0.0%+3.9%
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Total Returns. 3 categories are tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ROLR vs PENN vs CZR vs GENI vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ROLR or PENN or CZR or GENI or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) is the stronger pick with 31.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -26. 6% for High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN) a "Buy" — based on 47 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ROLR or PENN or CZR or GENI or JPM?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus High Roller Technologies, Inc. at 17. 6x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ROLR or PENN or CZR or GENI or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -73. 1% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus GENI's -31. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ROLR or PENN or CZR or GENI or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus High Roller Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 73β — meaning ROLR is approximately 189% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 7% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ROLR or PENN or CZR or GENI or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Genius Sports Limited (GENI) is pulling ahead at 31.

0% versus -26. 6% for High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: High Roller Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 143. 9% year-over-year, compared to -184. 4% for PENN Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GENI leads at 25. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ROLR or PENN or CZR or GENI or JPM?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -16. 7% for Genius Sports Limited — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -27. 8% for ROLR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ROLR or PENN or CZR or GENI or JPM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 29. 1x for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — 14. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GENI: 37. 2% to $9. 40.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ROLR or PENN or CZR or GENI or JPM?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. ROLR, PENN, CZR, GENI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ROLR or PENN or CZR or GENI or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR) carries a higher beta of 2. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ROLR and PENN and CZR and GENI and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (ROLR (Consumer Cyclical) and PENN (Consumer Cyclical) and CZR (Consumer Cyclical) and GENI (Communication Services) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ROLR is a small-cap deep-value stock; PENN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CZR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GENI is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while ROLR, PENN, CZR, GENI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.