Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
SBFG vs CFFI vs KO vs CZWI vs FXNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
SBFG vs CFFI vs KO vs CZWI vs FXNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $147M | $251M | $355.61B | $207M | $273M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $91M | $184M | $49.28B | $90M | $115M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $27M | $13.70B | $14M | $18M |
| Gross Margin | 70.6% | 69.1% | 61.7% | 54.7% | 74.7% |
| Operating Margin | 19.0% | 18.0% | 29.3% | 7.0% | 19.0% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 7.5x | 25.3x | 11.8x | 12.8x |
| Total Debt | $74M | $116M | $45.49B | $52M | $43M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $72M | $14M | $10.27B | $119M | $161M |
SBFG vs CFFI vs KO vs CZWI vs FXNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SB Financial Group,… (SBFG) | 100 | 147.3 | +47.3% |
| C&F Financial Corpo… (CFFI) | 100 | 232.2 | +132.2% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 312.8 | +212.8% |
| First National Corp… (FXNC) | 100 | 217.5 | +117.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SBFG vs CFFI vs KO vs CZWI vs FXNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SBFG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.64, yield 2.6%
- 2.6% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
CFFI is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 1.16 vs FXNC's 8.59
- NIM 3.8% vs CZWI's 2.9%
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 12.8x), PEG 1.16 vs 8.59
KO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 27.8% margin vs CFFI's 14.6%
- 13.1% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.0%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50 vs SBFG's 0.64, lower leverage
FXNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 27.1%, EPS growth 96.0%
- 258.5% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 149.0%
- 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
- +57.8% vs KO's +17.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 12.8x), PEG 1.16 vs 8.59 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs CFFI's 14.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs SBFG's 0.64, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.8% vs KO's +17.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.0% |
SBFG vs CFFI vs KO vs CZWI vs FXNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SBFG vs CFFI vs KO vs CZWI vs FXNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories
CFFI leads 1 • FXNC leads 1 • SBFG leads 0 • CZWI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 547.2x CZWI's $90M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CFFI's 14.6%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $91M | $184M | $49.3B | $90M | $115M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $19M | $36M | $15.5B | $9M | $25M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | $27M | $13.7B | $14M | $18M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $20M | $22M | $12.6B | $11M | $21M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.6% | +69.1% | +61.7% | +54.7% | +74.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.0% | +18.0% | +29.3% | +7.0% | +19.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.4% | +14.6% | +27.8% | +16.0% | +15.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | +11.9% | +25.5% | +12.4% | +18.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +12.1% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.5% | +10.7% | +18.2% | +63.0% | +7.1% |
Valuation Metrics
CFFI leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.3x trailing earnings, CFFI trades at a 66% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CFFI offers better value at 1.44x vs FXNC's 10.32x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $147M | $251M | $355.6B | $207M | $273M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $150M | $354M | $390.8B | $140M | $155M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.64x | 9.31x | 27.18x | 14.70x | 15.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.44x | 7.49x | 25.27x | 11.79x | 12.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.32x | 1.44x | 2.43x | 2.90x | 10.32x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.69x | 10.69x | 26.39x | 15.69x | 7.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.61x | 1.35x | 7.42x | 2.29x | 2.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.05x | 0.95x | 10.40x | 1.11x | 1.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.85x | 11.34x | 67.15x | 19.90x | 12.99x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. FXNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CFFI scores 8/9 vs CZWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.3% | +10.8% | +41.1% | +7.8% | +10.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +1.0% | +13.1% | +0.8% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.3% | +6.8% | +15.8% | +2.0% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.0% | +2.1% | +17.3% | +0.6% | +9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | 0.44x | 1.33x | 0.28x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | $102M | $35.2B | -$67M | -$118M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $72M | $14M | $10.3B | $119M | $161M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $74M | $116M | $45.5B | $52M | $43M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.68x | 0.73x | 10.70x | 0.16x | 0.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FXNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FXNC five years ago would be worth $17,101 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,484 for SBFG. Over the past 12 months, FXNC leads with a +57.8% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs CFFI's 13.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.6% | +9.9% | +20.3% | +24.3% | +24.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.3% | +21.7% | +17.2% | +52.1% | +57.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +98.0% | +46.4% | +47.0% | +153.7% | +103.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.8% | +68.4% | +65.6% | +69.0% | +71.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +167.5% | +118.6% | +121.1% | +149.0% | +258.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.6% | +13.5% | +13.7% | +36.4% | +26.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KO and FXNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SBFG's 0.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FXNC currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs CZWI's 94.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 0.55x | -0.20x | 0.50x | 0.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.93 | $80.99 | $84.04 | $22.62 | $30.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.10 | $57.09 | $65.35 | $12.83 | $18.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.4% | +95.3% | +98.3% | +94.9% | +99.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.2 | 58.0 | 60.6 | 51.2 | 67.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 4K | 12.7M | 41K | 79K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SBFG and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KO as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", FXNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.2% upside for KO (target: $86) vs -30.4% for FXNC (target: $21). For income investors, SBFG offers the higher dividend yield at 2.58% vs CZWI's 1.73%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $86.13 | — | $21.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 48 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +2.4% | +2.5% | +1.7% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 1 | 56 | 6 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.60 | $1.84 | $2.04 | $0.37 | $0.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.9% | +0.4% | +0.2% | +3.0% | +0.1% |
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CFFI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SBFG vs CFFI vs KO vs CZWI vs FXNC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SBFG or CFFI or KO or CZWI or FXNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger pick with 27.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Coca-Cola Company (KO) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SBFG or CFFI or KO or CZWI or FXNC?
On trailing P/E, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the cheapest at 9.
3x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, C&F Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: C&F Financial Corporation wins at 1. 16x versus First National Corporation's 8. 59x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SBFG or CFFI or KO or CZWI or FXNC?
Over the past 5 years, First National Corporation (FXNC) delivered a total return of +71.
0%, compared to +44. 8% for SB Financial Group, Inc. (SBFG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FXNC returned +258. 5% versus CFFI's +118. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SBFG or CFFI or KO or CZWI or FXNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus SB Financial Group, Inc. 's 0. 64β — meaning SBFG is approximately -422% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First National Corporation (FXNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SBFG or CFFI or KO or CZWI or FXNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First National Corporation (FXNC) is pulling ahead at 27.
1% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First National Corporation grew EPS 96. 0% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SBFG or CFFI or KO or CZWI or FXNC?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 14. 4% for C&F Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FXNC leads at 74. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SBFG or CFFI or KO or CZWI or FXNC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 16x versus First National Corporation's 8. 59x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 17. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KO: 4. 2% to $86. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — SBFG or CFFI or KO or CZWI or FXNC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
SB Financial Group, Inc. (SBFG) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 1. 7% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is SBFG or CFFI or KO or CZWI or FXNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, SBFG: +167. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SBFG and CFFI and KO and CZWI and FXNC?
These companies operate in different sectors (SBFG (Financial Services) and CFFI (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and CZWI (Financial Services) and FXNC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SBFG is a small-cap deep-value stock; CFFI is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; FXNC is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.